Science
is well known at this point for being historically (and, largely, currently) male dominated, to the point it's caused occasional problems with experimental methodology and whatnot. Conceptually it's gender neutral, practically it's had its troubles.
That said, it's pretty obvious they're redefining patriarchy as low care/high knowledge instead of anything actually resembling reality, so oddities are kinda' expected. I mean, the thing is describing a market economy as the perfect fusion of care and knowledge, which is a pile of horseshit so heaping it could bury the colossus of Rhodes.
– Fourth Wave Feminism is associated with Patriarchy?
Can't remember if it's the fourth or not, but there's definitely one of the waves that's associated with reinforcing stereotypical gender roles, which is probably where that originates. Basically part of the feminism movement
is associated with patriarchy (and by and large diametrically opposed to, y'know, the rest of it).
– "The Axis of Care" starts at Right Totalitarianism? (The origin of Axis Powers is Care?!)
Starts, yes, which means that's the lowest point available. Arrow end is high care, flat end is low care. Right Totalitarianism would be least care possible.
I can appreciate from a point of amusement that an incredibly soft-(pseudo)science graph shits on the soft sciences as being a point of knowledge, though. That's a good one.
