Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Frumple

Pages: 1 ... 985 986 [987] 988 989 ... 1929
14791
General Discussion / Re: Sheb's European Politics Megathread
« on: April 19, 2015, 06:52:24 pm »
It would also be fairly easy to game the system by hoarding and reselling food rations and coupons. Capitalism will prevail.
*shrugs* Which happens, yes, but not enough for the administrative costs necessary to prevent it to be actually cost effective. Costs more to prevent the misuse than the misuse costs the system.* We actually have some fairly sizable food stamp programs faffing about the world, heh. Pretty aware of what the costs and side-effects and whatnot are. Somewhat different than a rationing system, but not substantively.

*This is fairly consistently true for most welfare systems currently in use, actually, last I checked. Turns out the majority of folks in situations that need the help don't actually want to abuse the system :V

14792
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: April 19, 2015, 06:38:39 pm »
The site it's on has a link to click "if you experience any problems" which leads to a 404 error.
Beautiful. Those are always great. Broken fix broken buttons are the best things :3

... I don't suppose you have a list of the songs, so you can just listen off youtube or the like?

14793
General Discussion / Re: Sheb's European Politics Megathread
« on: April 19, 2015, 05:47:29 pm »
From what I recall, a basic income is actually better at doing that than, well, that. Does mostly the same thing, but allows for extra bits (excess education, minor capital investment, business startup, limited entertainment, etc.) on the side, while also cutting out part of the administration burden. Just givin' everyone cash takes less bureaucracy than giving them gift baskets or whatev', takes advantage of already existent infrastructure, and lets 'em better tailor the resources to their personal situation.

You just have to, y'know, peg the basic income to inflation and maybe general cost of living, instead of doing stupid shit like we do over here in the states and fight over the amounts every few years.

'Course, it'd probably be easier to institute a universal goods welfare type thing than basic income at the moment, so maybe as a transitional effort?

14794
General Discussion / Re: Sheb's European Politics Megathread
« on: April 19, 2015, 05:38:16 pm »
Pretty sure basic income's major opposition is less austerity and more just-world fallacy. Lot of the time giving people a basic livable income means you can just outright scrap most of the rest of welfare system and save money per head, nevermind the knock-on effects (greater productivity in those who still work, which is a majority, significant increase in entrepreneurial efforts since folks can suddenly afford to take risks, etc., etc.) of having people not having to worry about starving to death on the streets.

And yeah, we're well aware at this point from the statistics of it that trickle-down just doesn't bleedin' work, from what I remember. Wealth concentration in the top echelons just means greater wealth disparity and a steady decrease in median wealth for the country in question. Give "better" stock prices and more dividends and most of what you end up with is fewer, richer, rich people.

14795
General Discussion / Re: Sheb's European Politics Megathread
« on: April 19, 2015, 12:18:23 pm »
I'll try to restate my point in clearer terms: Thinking up stuff for a thought economy is not for everyone. Some people are good at thinking or entertaining, while others are better at doing practical things with their hands. If the current trend is allowed to proceed, the latter category of people will be declared useless.
Then they handcraft (quite a bit of art falls into this category, as well as a notable amount of production -- plenty of crazy people with money prefer handcrafted material over functionally better mass produced stuff) or add some volunteer work to industry or maintenance or somethin'. Just because folks are useless don't mean they can't still build stuff. Hell, there's quite a few farms that work like that already, just as an example -- specialty productions or subsistence work, that sort of thing.

The metaphorical 98% just do... whatever. If they want to make stuff, they make stuff. If they want to vegetate in front of a TV, they vegetate in front of a TV. If they want to produce art, or aid science, or give a hand to local efforts, or whatever, they do. We don't have full employment now (unless you count the bullshit term economics use, which builds in a fairly significant unemployment rate), we won't in the future, and we're going to eventually have to deal with the fact many people just aren't needed anymore.

Being useless ain't so bad, y'know? So long as you don't starve and whatnot.

14796
General Discussion / Re: Sheb's European Politics Megathread
« on: April 19, 2015, 12:02:22 pm »
Eh, you could conceivably trim down on that a lot, by simply enforcing monopolies (only one brand of most things) and cutting outlets down significantly. That would have obvious issues, of course (quality/practicality for the former, greater transport costs for the consumer for the latter, just as examples), but you could conceivably do it. There's a very significant amount of redundancy in retail and a fair amount of wastage.

... mind you, doing that would cut in to industrial production fairly significantly as well, since demand would just kinda' plummet. Which would further exaggerate unemployment issues, heh.

14797
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: April 19, 2015, 11:47:00 am »
... how would you survive having a glove put over that, scree?

Though I guess you mean the birth control method. Which, uh. I guess would be easier to survive but putting a glove on that first that sounds intensely uncomfortable.

14798
General Discussion / Re: Sheb's European Politics Megathread
« on: April 19, 2015, 11:42:53 am »
*shrugs* We could, I guess, but it'd leave a lot of people without anything to do, unless we turned back the clock and artificially induced massive amounts of inefficiency in our basically everything. Which would be ridiculously stupid. What you're suggesting would more or less demand either supporting a(n even more) significant unemployed population or a fairly sizable population cull.

... though I'd be curious what you mean by that everything else. Surprisingly, even if we have excesses and inefficiencies in a lot of areas, most jobs don't actually exist for bullshit reasons -- (significantly) more people may be working in them than necessary with good methodology and automation, but they're generally there for fairly solid reasons of one sort or another. There's exceptions, but those honestly makes up a damn small portion of the current economy, to the best of my knowledge.

14799
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: April 19, 2015, 11:29:03 am »
... what the zog has nine letters, can have a glove put on it, and deserves to be censored?

14800
General Discussion / Re: Sheb's European Politics Megathread
« on: April 19, 2015, 11:25:36 am »
Medical, education, entertainment, much of the civilian infrastructure system (mail, most of the internet), all those useful bits of administration that have contributed to the absolute skyrocketing of industrial efficiency... basically tear down the entirety of human civilization, more or less, except the bits that produce food and junk.

The service industry isn't a parasite, it's the economical equivalent of gut flora. An incredibly vital symbiont the rest of the system can't really work without, and certainly can't work well.

14801
General Discussion / Re: You wanna rescue the world?
« on: April 19, 2015, 05:22:25 am »
Well, if it makes you feel any better, the trend is looking like we're going to see an ice-free arctic by... 2020, I think it was. Something like 2035 at the latest. We've almost certainly got under a decade before we see it, and pretty much dead certain under two barring something really gorram odd happening. Been dropping an average of ~440 km3 per year since '79 or so, and we've got around 3.4k km3 left.

Dunno about the antarctic, though.

Still. Only a small handful more years until we get to just flat out find out. Isn't it terrifying exciting?

14802
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: April 18, 2015, 09:05:46 pm »
Yeah, I guess technically there could be a cat, like. Inside. Actually playing the trumpet? I'd hope it's a kitten, honestly, but whatever floats a critter's boat so long as everyone survives the experience unmaimed.

14803
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: April 18, 2015, 09:01:50 pm »
Look, AC. I'll level with ya'. I don't actually care what it is. If it's a musical instrument shoved up someone's bum, I'm calling it a trumpet.

14804
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: April 18, 2015, 08:27:18 pm »
Wasn't talking about the cats.

14805
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: April 18, 2015, 08:22:49 pm »
ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ノ != ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
ヽ( ຈ ͜ʖ ຈ)ノ

Pages: 1 ... 985 986 [987] 988 989 ... 1929