Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Frumple

Pages: 1 ... 1117 1118 [1119] 1120 1121 ... 1929
16771
... yeah, I really don't actually care enough to go digging through the qur'an and muslim theology and whatnot to offer a position on the subject that isn't "slavering israeli islamophobe". So I'll just kind of idly remind anyone looking at just about anything BP has and/or will say on the subject of islam that the vast majority of muslim individuals -- and, indeed, countries -- have been no more or less intolerant of their neighbors (regardless of their religious inclinations) than basically anyone else. Especially in relation to countries in similar sociopolitical situations.

As any even remotely learned follower of an abrahamic religion will tell you, which parts do and do not get followed, to what extent, and under what interpretations and contexts, vary radically with time, culture, and so on.

16772
General Discussion / Re: Was Anyone Ever Actually Offended By B.C./A.D.?
« on: October 26, 2014, 05:26:46 pm »
"Hurr durr destroy religions" is neither the point nor a goal, fruitperson. It's to stop using excluding language when possible, particularly for general use stuff. Things like this topic is small potatoes... but it is potatoes. And every little bit helps break a cultural belief that it's okay to just casually disregard huge swathes of the human population without good reason. Even just suborning a previously established system with more currently palatable terminology is pretty good -- what christians did to winter solstice is a pretty good example case of how to do this sort of thing, in general.

People get influenced by subconscious junk all the ruddy time, and stuff like the AD/BC thing is precisely the sort of venue that sort of thing works through. Few singular instances are major influences, but the issue is in congregate -- thousands of little things working together to foster, say, xenophobia or bigotry or whatever particular strain of virulent ignorance is in vogue at this moment. With this one, it's one tiny message saying, "We don't give a fuck about anyone not part or descendant of the christian cultural hegemony" and another tiny one saying, "Christian terminology in our culture is normal and acceptable, even if it's effectively snubbing parts of our population". Sure, it's just tiny ones, and singular instances, but in the face of dozens or hundreds of similar messages, it adds the zog up.

Is it really not evident why things like that shouldn't be changed, when possible?

16773
General Discussion / Re: Was Anyone Ever Actually Offended By B.C./A.D.?
« on: October 26, 2014, 04:56:12 pm »
Often times, if you manage to change the superficial stuff, the underlying problems become more tractable. It's one of the specific reasons activist groups will go after relatively minor things instead of major, game-changing things -- because if you get enough minor changes through, the major ones become a lot more likely.

Similarly, with cases like this, the less a (undesirably) culturally hegemonic thingjigger is referenced in general, the harder it is for that hegemony to stay entrenched. The less it is culturally normal to reference the subject in question, the less it is seen as culturally normal to preference said subject in other ways.

In other words, stop slapping the gorram christian references on bloody everything and it stops being so bloody influential. Kill the sacred duck, and then you get to kill the sacred cow once people start thinking it, also, is a duck.

16774
General Discussion / Re: I like anime, do you like anime?
« on: October 26, 2014, 04:29:29 pm »
... something about that line coming from someone with your avatar is making my brain twig out a lil', hawk.

Hey man, Berserk has better pacing AND characters than Fate/stay Night.
I wouldn't necessarily disagree (though, imo, the FS/N fanfiction kicks 'zerk's ass :P And the worldbuilding is much more appealing, t'me.), but the thing I remember most about that character is
Spoiler: this (click to show/hide)

16775
Yeah, at this point this shit needs to go to another thread.

16776
General Discussion / Re: Was Anyone Ever Actually Offended By B.C./A.D.?
« on: October 26, 2014, 10:17:54 am »
... because most people aren't actively trying to be terrible human beings. That's why.

16777
Damn it, people.
"Lobotomy" is not synonymous with "Personality Overhaul".
... and yet, the latter arises from the former. It's not synonymous, no, but it is an explicit consequence. As noted, it is, indeed, a laughably simple surgery that results in significant personality shifts.

It's just, uh. Not very precise. Or generally desired. And the particular method mentioned would probably kill you. But it would do what Puff said it would do.

Pretty sure we've got less hamfisted processes (beyond lobotomies, mind) as well, though. Still very rarely used and far from particularly sophisticated,* but they're out there.

* And, considering the variance between human brains, even if we do end up being able to perform tailed personality alterations, it's probably going to be a long time before it can be done on anything but a subset of the population. And prohibitively expensive for anything but limited use. There's much more simple and economical ways of population control, anyway. Propaganda, just to start.

16778
General Discussion / Re: Christian beliefs and discussion
« on: October 25, 2014, 08:05:53 pm »
I'm not even sure if there are active judaism worshipping B12 members. We've got an israeli or two, but the more vocal one is an atheist. Not that it would be terribly surprising if there aren't -- there's not really very many worshipers of judaism out there, world wide. Something like 14 mil, a couple years ago. Which. Y'know, florida outnumbers that. Only slightly more adherents than ruddy Illinois has people.

Don't really have much in the way of interaction with them, myself. Got some family that are (non-practicing/former) adherents, but outside of a (kinda' half-hearted) Hanukkah celebration or two when I was much, much younger it never really came up. Think I've got one of those spinny-top things shoved into a box in some closet or another, I'unno.

Honestly, if it weren't for the connection to the other abrahamic religions and israel regularly ruining everything around it, I don't think Judaism would really matter that much, these days. You're not doing too well when you're outnumbered by Juche.

E: I'd again recommend avoiding Islam, though. Another thread would be fine, but probably better to keep that discussion separate from others. Unfortunately, the vitriol directed toward it is another magnitude above that directed at christianity.

16779
... chaos artifacts probably can. Warp tainted tree branches and whatnot.

16780
General Discussion / Re: Was Anyone Ever Actually Offended By B.C./A.D.?
« on: October 25, 2014, 06:12:21 pm »
FD, I believe you're underestimating the resilience of religions against progress and the religiousness of large parts of the world.
... I'd say probably not. I'm not even sure the majority of people my age, nevermind younger, actually know what AD means. Last time I remember hearing someone being asked, I think they said "After Death" (shit, critical education failure but I'm pretty sure that's what I was originally taught in freaking school) -- and the area I grew up in was/is about as religious as western culture gets. Doesn't help that neither the BC nor AD (or BCE or CE, or whatever) thing is ever actually used outside of certain parts of academia/history related stuff. It's honestly kinda' useless for every day needs, which is another way of saying it's straight up doomed to fade into obscurity within a handful of generations.

I'm actually kinda' surprised no one here's just suggested PH and H for appellations -- prehistory and history. The latter can start however far back it was we found the first writing bits, and the former can be everything before that. Sure, it would technically make our years a bigger number, but it's not like the vast majority of its use isn't shortened to two digits anyway.

16781
General Discussion / Re: I like anime, do you like anime?
« on: October 25, 2014, 06:03:36 pm »
... something about that line coming from someone with your avatar is making my brain twig out a lil', hawk.

16782
Nabbed up ZQHXB-EQVHV-WGCAQ. Cheers, AP. E: Nin nin!

16783
General Discussion / Re: Christian beliefs and discussion
« on: October 25, 2014, 01:46:46 pm »
But it didn't say anything on the creature itself having children that were entirely different from it
... because evolution doesn't work like that. At all. Physiological/genetic shifts that radical are something that would take divine interference to produce, generally.

As for the single celled into multicellular. Most of that other stuff occurs on time scales we really haven't been around long enough to track, yet. We're fairly close (as in a few centuries, on the outside) to being able to artificially induce that sort of thing, though.

16784
General Discussion / Re: Christian beliefs and discussion
« on: October 25, 2014, 11:24:50 am »
Until we find evidence of something that adds more chromosomes than it already has to itself and alters I won't believe that kind of evolution exists
Yes? That's just intraspecies, but it's an explicit example of additional (or removed) chromosomes leading to physiological changes. Several (if not, perhaps, all) of the mechanisms behind chromosome addition or subtraction are known and observed.

If you're looking for some examples of observed speciation, including some that occur through change in chromosomal number, you can check here -- it's about a decade old, but that doesn't really mean much. The list starts about half way through, with explanations of what's going on in each, and the sources are at the bottom for your perusal.

16785
General Discussion / Re: Christian beliefs and discussion
« on: October 24, 2014, 09:26:03 pm »
P.S.
Why do you refer to God the Father solely as YHWH, and God the Son as "Streaker J?"
For the former, it seems both more accurate and more respectful (well, to believers -- my respect for YWHW itself is zero.). Original transcriber's likely gender bias aside, the concept of assigning a gender to something omnipresent or so beyond human as YWHW is ascribed as being is vaguely farcical to me. So I stick to YWHW (and I avoid Yaweh simply because YWHW is less letters) or it, when referring to the presumed creator deity. Try to, anyway.

As for not just using God... honestly, I find it better to stick to something more definite. There's a lot of Gods -- effectively three (at the absolute least), just among the major abrahamic religions. YWHW's more specific, y'know? Also not quite ready to stop reminding both myself and others that, no, christians haven't completely divorced themselves from the abomination of the being the OT describes.

As for Streaker J.
Quote from: for the lazy
All that said, Wink's interpretation makes for much more amusing headcanon, and I like it better, now. Christ, He Who Advocated Public Indecency to Shame Your Oppressors.

Streaker J is yesunim's street name now, by the way.

Also ninja'd, huh.

Pages: 1 ... 1117 1118 [1119] 1120 1121 ... 1929