Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Frumple

Pages: 1 ... 1127 1128 [1129] 1130 1131 ... 1929
16921
I... don't think they would? You're not objectkitty. Also no guarantee that aliases have the same people behind 'em, regardless. I know there's a handful of other Frumples out there in the wild internet. I know because they're all on the list, and one day, there will be only one.
S'not an assumption most people make unless the name is really distinctive, basically, and things based around fairly common words (Like, y'know, Objective)... isn't. Particularly. So you're good, obj. You could probably even get away with having a reddit account of the same name and claiming you're not the same person.

16922
... why not?

16923
General Discussion / Re: Post-Scarcity Thread
« on: October 13, 2014, 05:17:02 pm »
... still in pretty bad taste, considering that hasn't been a substantial issue for our species in centuries (millennium? Bloody long while, in any case.). Treating humans as resources is pretty scummy in general, really. Especially when if there's anything we have a surplus of, it's humans.

Beyond that, it's not like we're terribly far from cracking decent cloning and iron womb style tech as is. If our species wanted it, I rather imagine we could have an artificial solution to genetic diversity (non)problems pretty quickly. LB mentioned most of the solution to the non-genetic issues involved. Advancing psychology methodology deals with the rest.

16924
General Discussion / Re: I like anime, do you like anime?
« on: October 13, 2014, 05:05:49 pm »
It... would appear to be an actual word? Maybe?

Or at least it's been used before the show in question showed up. A few times. Even on stuff that's vaguely respectable. I think. I didn't actually check the websites citing the word, just the google summary whatsits. Neototype specimens and whatnot.

It doesn't even have a wikipedia page, though. Presumably it's like a prototype, just... you. Neo.

... which I belatedly notice you noticed. Eh. Posting anyway.

16925
General Discussion / Re: I like anime, do you like anime?
« on: October 13, 2014, 01:45:06 pm »
In their defense though, that kind of thing does happen in real life
It really doesn't. I don't think we've had a single nuclear reactor actually go boom to anything even approaching that extent -- about the worst has been Chernobyl, and even it didn't wipe clean the countryside. Contaminate a junkload of stuff, sure, but the explody bits involved there wasn't that impressive.

In that one episode of AWX, not only do two go critical and explode, they explode in an absolutely massive way. Apparently because some pipes are torn out. Auto-shutoff where?

Quote
and I would imagine that if you have super-advanced tech, the number of things that can go wrong are exponentially higher then they are with our current tech level.
Last I checked, we've actually become successively less likely to experience catastrophic failure as our technology has improved :V Nuclear's safer than coal, etc., etc.

A modern reactor nowadays, insofar as I'm aware, is basically incapable of exploding. Like, you could hit the powerplant with a nuke and it wouldn't cook off. It'd stop working, and there'd probably be quite a bit of radioactive mess, but no successive boom. And beyond that, they're the next best thing to impossible to intentionally wreck. We've gotten really good at making sure the things don't screw up -- most of the problems we have with nuclear is because of human failure, not mechanical. Not upgrading, cutting corners, etc.

... that said, yeah, it is a pretty common sci-fi science failure. S'become bloody jarring for me, though. Portable reactors -- MS powerplants, tanks, whatev' -- I can wave off a bit easier, but an actual powerplant is, like. No. And the thought of the things being left on for over a decade and a half is just... more no. *it-doesn't-work-like-that flailing* No engineer is going to build a reactor that goes for a decade without human interaction without shutting itself off, like. After a month or two at the most. Probably less, because failsafe.

I guess I sorta' can't blame it. The show was made in '96, so there was both less sophisticated methodology and more prevalent misinformation regarding nuclear et al. Still rankles. It's sometimes astounding how hard space magic technology apparently simultaneously hits people with the idiot stick, when it really, really shouldn't. Realize it's more a failure of the writers than anything, but... still.

16926
Is it normal to see someone who is so attractive it actually makes you angry?
Because that is apparently a thing for me. I'm going to guess it's a mix between jealousy and angerousal. Still weird though. And annoying that it happens.
Don't think it's particularly normal, no. Also not particularly unknown, either.

Never felt that, myself, though. Attractiveness is just... attractiveness. Generally a good thing, not to be associated with negative emotions on pain of pain.

Like, if I started to feel some kind of jealousy or anger at seeing a pretty person (due to their prettiness, anyway -- other reasons unassociated with attractiveness are alright), I'd make sure to headbutt the nearest wall until the stupidity left my body and I could go back to appreciating the delicious sexy in peace. Brick house is zen, zen is brick house. Ohminna.

16927
supposed to be
>_>

I found the problem :V

16928
Well, yes, boom indeed. But I rather imagine there's less painful options for suicide in the face of zombie apocalypse...

16929
RAGE STATUS: MAXIMUM

I recently got Office 2013. In Excel's Formula field (next to fx), you can no longer Ctrl+A to select the entire field.

RAAAAAAAAAAAAAEG
Libreoffice lets you do that just fiiiine~

@Gig: How? Maybe need to give it another go, I'unno. It was one of those games that just noped out entirely on me, and nothing I could find on the subject would work.

16930
Perhaps the more pertinent question is what aren't they hiding. After all, if they're perfectly willing to display a fleet of torpedo armed cutters, what do their actual secrets look like?

I mean, I'm not saying they have cthulhutech-style gundams built around the imprisoned flesh of lindsey's brethren, but...

16931
Also because of the continued insistence on ignoring all the people who have actually played the game that have told you it doesn't really work that way :V

16932
... unless it's something in the software, yes. As noted, Chaos Gate. For whatever reason, the ruddy thing will not, at all, run on a 64x machine. I've ran into similar things in the past, as well.

Yeah, technically it's probably that the software isn't forward compatible, however the zog that would work, but it comes out to the same thing, functionally.

16933
It is the light of hate, good fellow.

16934
Can't you run them in compatibility mode? I've had to do that for any number of games that apparently hate modern systems .__.
Nah. Some things will literally flat not work on a 64x system. Compatibility, dosbox, freaking virtual machines, all no mos. Ran into it fairly recently with one of the older Warhammer 40k games, ferex. Chaos Gate, iirc. Near as I could find via googling and experimentation, the only option was "Not have a 64x machine" *table flips*

Mind you, many things will work via compat or dosbox or whatev'. S'just some things won't.

16935
I wish that 64 bit wasn't required for so many games.
I wish the ruddy things were backwards compatible. Too much of the stuff I like can't run on a 64x computer ;_;

Pages: 1 ... 1127 1128 [1129] 1130 1131 ... 1929