Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Frumple

Pages: 1 ... 114 115 [116] 117 118 ... 1929
1726
General Discussion / Re: Mathematics Help Thread
« on: May 10, 2022, 09:11:52 pm »
I have no idea what most of those terms mean, but! If it helps any, breaking it down, it's asking this:

Let B (babble) be the basis for subspace W of the space of continuous functions (whatever the blazes that is).
Let Dx be the differential operator on W.
Find a matrix for Dx, relative to B. Plug that matrix into the 4x4 square of answers.

So that... well, I can't say it won't be hard? But it seems fairly straightforward if you can figure out how to get a matrix out of that parenthesis stuff? Presumably whatever you're using as a text/reference would tell you what those terms are and how to mathify them.

1727
General Discussion / Re: Food Thread: Kitchen Chemistry
« on: May 10, 2022, 08:28:22 pm »
no more edits, be bumped!

The lemon frosted cashews came out pretty decent for something made so lazily.

So, like. What you do! Is you take a bowl. You pour like... some powdered sugar in it. Then you take one (1) lemon, cut the end off the lemon. Put the lemon over the bowl, cut end down. Squeeze. Squeeze until it's done.

Then stir it up until you have frosting! It's good frosting, I have described this frosting before. It may not be the best lemon frosting but it's pretty damn good and it's impressively difficult to find a better effort to taste ratio.

Once you've done that, you (and this is the lazy part that can be done much, much better with just a little effort like putting it on a pan and baking it for a few minutes or whatever, there's tons that can be done here) take a pile of cashews, dump them in the bowl, and then stir until they're coated.

I left it in the fridge overnight to set a little, but you don't, like. Have to. You can just eat them.

Anyway, they pretty good. Lemony, sweeter than usual cashews. I like 'em, everyone else that's ate them likes 'em. Just remember, folks. Icing is super easy to make, and at the end of the day you can put it on anything.

1728
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: May 10, 2022, 06:27:31 pm »
... in unrelated news, apparently some members of the GOP are threatening to (try to) reduce the federal copyright duration (on basically Disney, specifically, huffpo link for details), as retaliation for Disney not supporting anti-LGBT legislation down in florida.

And I'm, just, like. No, no, please go on. Do something useful for once in your lives, GOP :V

Zero chance of it happening, for like a dozen different reasons, but shit, c'mon you damn cowards, kneecap the copyright duration, woke tech companies would hate that!

1729
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: May 10, 2022, 06:45:16 am »
If she wins, the unborn children will not die. 
This... isn't true, though. If she wins, somewhere between a similar number and more unborn children will die, and so will more mothers and more actual children.

Some of the folks her and her ilk are swindling may be able to truthfully say they're legitimately and unwillfully unaware of that, but a SCOTUS judge doesn't get to make that excuse. No leader or person particularly invested in the issue does, as they have the time or resources to do the research.

1730
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: May 09, 2022, 10:47:31 pm »
Authoritarianism is the consolidation of power away from the people and into the hands of the few/the one. It is calling upon One Great Leader to "Save" us, by taking away our democratic institutions. I mean, if Biden is so great, why not let HIM be President-For-Life?
... by that definition the SCOTUS decision would be wildly more authoritarian than an EO seeking to mitigate its repercussions, though, since the former is seeking to strip power from somewhere approaching half the country's population and put it in the hands of a handful of people (and to an extent their enforcers) and the latter would be seeking to reverse or mitigate that. Biden making such an order would be explicitly anti-authoritarian under that definition. He'd be doing an end-run around state governments seeking to take away all sorts of powers from its population, particularly over their own health, explicitly in order to return that power to the country's people.

Nevermind that by that, the SCOTUS is a flat out authoritarian edifice. It's not a particularly democratic institution to begin with, it especially hasn't been for a while now, and it regularly takes power out of the hands of the country's people. This wouldn't be a discussion of two wrongs to begin with, it'd be a discussion of one tremendous one and a possible way to reduce its severity.

1731
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: May 09, 2022, 05:30:30 pm »
And McTraveller was right.  Two wrongs don't make right.

I would argue as to the "entirely within the President's Legal Powers" bit.  It's just that the Supreme Court hasn't bothered to stop it, yet.
Which means startlingly little as to whether it would be within the president's legal powers, at this point. Majority of the court are now hacks willing to toss out half a century of precedent for political gain. Their rulings don't particularly mean much of substance anymore, to the extent they ever did.

Any case, "providing reproductive healthcare for areas without access" would be, like... if not the exact opposite of authoritarianism, at least highly orthogonal to it. It'd be harder federalist than we've seen in a while, I think, but not authoritarian.

Not particularly likely to happen, anyway (far as I'm aware no one of note has suggested the possibility in meatspace -- it's circulating a bit online, but that's it), so it's a pretty moot question.

1732
General Discussion / Re: 2022 Hot Fresh Reading Challenge Thread
« on: May 09, 2022, 01:27:46 pm »
We only still do that with the expensive and old ones, yes.

1733
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: May 09, 2022, 01:26:53 pm »
So... what do you want to do about it? Complaining doesn't do much. I mean yes the current GOP and its supporters is going down a path I don't like.  All I can do is discuss with my sphere of influence, vote against the GOP, and give support to non-GOP causes.
That's about all most folks can do, really. Vote the scum out, give succor to their enemies as you can, and to the extent you're able counter their propaganda horseshit in your personal life.

More than that takes organization beyond what you're probably wise attempting online, given the US's traditional hostility to non-conservative groups, but if interested you're probably best off finding active protest and/or community action groups and getting involved and networking with them. Just, y'know, be careful, for all sorts of reasons from grifters to state sanctioned brutality :-\

1734
General Discussion / Re: 2022 Hot Fresh Reading Challenge Thread
« on: May 09, 2022, 01:17:17 pm »
It's entirely possible they have a fine free month (or have just gone fine free entirely; more than one library out there has, as it tends to actually save money due to increase in returns) if you actually still have the book to return. Late fees often have a cap, too.

... if you don't, and the book is missing, the cost is usually just the price of replacement, which varies on a lot of stuff -- joint I work at, the most common replacement costs are 26-ish and 30 USD (we're initial cost at publication + 10 for processing and whatnot), which isn't exactly cheap, but it's not super backbreaking for most folks, either.

Libraries are also fairly likely to work with you for a payment plan or somethin', and will generally let you read inside regardless (though plague regs may effect that, these days), so, y'know. Options!

1735
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: May 09, 2022, 07:10:05 am »
Yes just what we need, more executive orders to bypass Congress.  You know how you get an authoritarian state? Executive Orders.
I mean, you know how you get one much, much faster? A coup. Remember what happened not too long ago and was supported by folks on a certain wing of our political spectrum all the way up to swaths of that congress, the spouse of a SCOTUS judge, and the literal president? That up and down that line show every indication of being willing to try again the exact moment they think it's a good time?

Short form, if you're worried about that, you've got a much, much larger concern than executive orders, right now, and it's called the GOP and pretty much everyone aligned with them, who are actively working towards an authoritarian takeover and either entirely okay with that or incapable of figuring out what they're doing.

Quote
And while I've not voted conservative in quite some time, I'm going to have to sit and think more about these cries about the new "conservative" party. I know a lot of people there, and they are generally just people trying to make their way through the world and wouldn't directly harm anyone. But I do see that many of the things they support do indirectly harm people.

So how do you get these people with legitimate personal concerns, who don't feel that the alternative party is even talking to their concerns, to stop supporting the party that talks to their personal concerns while simultaneously stomping all over "public" concerns?
There's some success with personal, one on one interaction over a long period of time. It's risky on several different levels (because let me tell you from personal experience, a lot of those folks you're saying are just trying to make their way through the world are incredibly capable of various sorts of much more direct harm than you're thinking, under the right circumstances, such as a black person courting their kids, an immigrant moving into the neighborhood, or finding their children are some form of lgbt) and likely enough to just not work, but it's possible to do if you're willing to take on that tremendous amount of time and often enough danger.

... on a wide scale level, you can't. It sucks to say, but practically people particularly attached to the GOP are lost to communication. Most of these folks are hateful shits about one subject or another, and are generally sunk deep into a propaganda sphere being propagated and maintained by shitsacks that are even worse, one that blankets their entire community from news to radio. It's effectively impossible to break that under the constraints the US is under. You'd have to be able to kill Fox and its ilk, Sinclair, enforce libel and whatnot en masse on public radio in a way that would be a blatant 1A violation (possibly manageable due to this shit being a stochastic terrorism breeding chamber, but let me tell you it'd have anyone worried about actual authoritarianism), break the back of all the voter suppression and intimidation coming out of the US conservative political machines, and things of that nature.

The GOP and conservative politicians in general are pretty damn unpopular in this country with somewhere between a majority to a supermajority of the population. You just have to figure out a way to make that matter in a political system that is viciously engineered to favor anti-democratic rightwing extremists, which is damn difficult when the system you're trying to work with is rigged as hell in their favor.

1736
General Discussion / Re: The Non-English Thread
« on: May 07, 2022, 10:55:10 pm »
Feel free to necro the older thread, instead. Hypnotoad approves of such if you have something of note to actually add to the discussion.

1737
General Discussion / Re: ♪ The Great Music Thread ♫
« on: May 07, 2022, 08:04:43 pm »
Electric Swing Circus - Shake. Just kinda' eh on the vocals, but that instrumentation is wild. I think it's trumpet? You'll know it when it happens if you listen. Some kind of brass, anyway, and I want more like it rather intensely.

e: seriously, anyone who listens to that, if you happen to know if there's a specific term for how that brass is played when it flips out please, please tell me

1738
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: May 07, 2022, 02:46:32 pm »
I mean seriously when the current administration's goal is to get someone elected that only satisfies a certain demographic, I find that highly political.  Same as with the previous administration picking nominees from a particular demographic. Now, I think there are probably very qualified people in that demographic, but choosing someone specifically for a demographic doesn't sit well with me.
That... wasn't the current administration's only goal -- the justice chosen was highly qualified, and the demographics involved just added a perspective to the court it could damn sure use. It was a factor, but far from the only one. Pretty sure there hasn't been a non-political SCOTUS nomination since the institution was bloody founded, though. There damn sure hasn't been one in my lifetime.

... the previous administration's choice wasn't a demographic choice, either, unless by demographic you mean "partisan hack". It was pretty damn likely to fall in certain demographics due to that, but that was mostly just because US conservative hacks and the folks willing to support or nominate them are virulently bigoted in general.

1739
General Discussion / Re: The Big Random Questions Thread
« on: May 07, 2022, 02:06:07 pm »
The forums itself? Some sort of ISOT or system apocalypse, probably. Some of those are fairly gentle in terms of electronics sticking around. Most other sorts would thoroughly trash internet infrastructure and potential backups.

1740
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: May 07, 2022, 01:25:08 pm »
And those justices didn't "outright lie"; Congress isn't stupid. They got confirmed on a partisan agenda, just as Congress intended. No lying was required.
They did, in fact, outright lie about what they would eventually do. Kav-whatever at a minimum stated during the confirmation process he'd respect precedent on issues in general (and iirc in respect to Roe, specifically), and is now in writing as in favor of not doing that. That's what is called lying.

Pretty sure there's similar shit in regards to multiple of the other scum in favor on the leak, but I can't recall the specifics off the top of my head.

Pages: 1 ... 114 115 [116] 117 118 ... 1929