Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Frumple

Pages: 1 ... 1185 1186 [1187] 1188 1189 ... 1929
17791
I want a rebirth of all the old war3 maps through dota one day.
Pretty much. It... y'know, it'd be pretty great to play WC3 custom maps again, just without dotabots gumming up the game list and making it a half step from impossible to find anything besides DotA to play. And since, in this case, DotA would be stuck in its own little box over in the corner, it'd be a lot easier! Such a nice thought. WC3 custom games, sans dota.

17792
Oh yeah, it's been going on for a while now. Not really something new. Definitely an example of why you don't fucking privatize any portion of your criminal justice system, regardless.

17793
Except paid worse, somehow. Also occasionally outright forced to work, from what I understand. For profit penal slavery is a thing in the US of A, these days. Incidentally, I do happen to wish terrible things upon each and every one of the bastards running the private prison industry. Also try where I can do avoid doing business with anyone that does business with them, which is harder than you'd think. For extra delicious something-vile, the private prison industry is also where a fair amount of US production work has disappeared to, where the prisoners get paid pennies on the dollar for what they do -- much of which would be working to low middle class jobs if it weren't being done on the backs of what amounts to penal slaves. The ones actually stealing jobs from the american public, that.

USA 2014 -- an economy partially tied in with domestic for-profit slavery. Yup. Amazingly little media attention to the subject, ha.

17794
Naaah, there's plenty of stuff related to anger that still fits, right? Frustration, irritation, indignation, etc., so forth, so on. The lesser not!angers that don't involve actually getting outright pissed.

Though making people burst into flames is easy. No anger mastery points required. Just a lighter and maybe some butane or somethin'. Damnit lyeos, you ninja'd me ;_;

17795
Hard to get angry after you've spent a decade and change in a situation where losing your temper would likely end up with you either maimed or homeless, ha. After a point it just... stops coming. Can't do anything about it, brain gives up offering it up as a solution eventually, apparently. Did for me, anyway.

Doesn't help that it's an entirely counterproductive emotion, personally. Doesn't do a damned thing but make me tired and miserable, bleh.

17796
That sounds kinda' amazing, if accurate. Two trillion freed up to be spent on things besides getting places and not turning into a muddied pile of meat on the side of the road? Glorious. I could buy a lot more food during the year if I could slash vehicle related costs to a fraction of what they are, ha! Or any hundred other things. To hell with the auto industry, imagine what $2tril freed up to ramble around the rest of the economy can do? Medicine, science, entertainment, infrastructure... plenty of nice places for that money to go~

17797
They were called 'Turks' and not 'Ottomans'? says who? As far as I know, 'Ottomans' was used. Turks as well, but that is a bit like calling everyone in the united kingdom 'English'.
All I know is it's kinda' awkward to be calling people footstools. Turks sounds like a better name, t'me.

17798
Is the middle east not better off now than it was before the 80s? How would it be better off without outside influence?
To be honest, I'm not entirely sure anyone was saying it would be better without outside influence. Investment, trade, all that stuff is pretty nice and there's certainly been some degree of just that. M'pretty down with that, personally -- hell, pretty much my entire ranting bits a lil'while ago was about getting foreign interactions in the region to be less lopsided and/or disruptive.

It's the, as you say, ham-fisted military bullshit along with all the cold war-style further bullshit and probably most of the latest round of "terror war" bullshit-in-the-year-20XX it could really have done without. I'd rather imagine it would have been better off without extremely, overtly, and often times intentionally disruptive foreign influence. Though that's kinda' tautological, I guess. Positive influence is positive, negative influence is negative. Investing in infrastructure good, blowing it up bad. Degree of simplification there, obviously, but the point gets across. I hope.

17799
I have to get up an hour earlier tomorrow morning to work at a place that I'm not sure I can find.
Map website?

17800
Same question for Frumple, actually. Do you deny that foreign policy should have a moral component?
Not really, no. But if you can point to a single thing the US has done in the last couple decades in the ME that has anything that could be positively identified as having a moral component worth any note whatsoever, I will be incredibly surprised.* With rare exception, every intervention the US has participated in for the last ever has gone tits up with full capitals involved -- at this point, I'd say we have a stronger moral burden to stay the fuck out, because we've repeatedly proven we can't make things better.

Beyond that, if there is a moral component, then it's a universal one -- as I said, it's either global (something goddamn everyone should do something about), and should have a global response, or it's not, and shouldn't. Which is to say if it's not, the moral component needs to be left to the folks on the ground (note: Incredibly damned difficult when you're on the other side of an ocean!).

But it's long reached the point for me where I'll say it bluntly: If the rest of the world doesn't consider the moral component reason enough to pitch in evenly to a solution, neither do I. States have way too many civil issues for an economy of its strength to be shitting it down some third world sump with no sign of it doing a bloody thing, especially when everyone else seems damned and determined to not give a damn. If that makes me an immoral bastard, well. Okay. Foreign policy moral burden is fully subsided by domestic policy moral burden -- can't fix neighbor's tire when back yard is on fire, doubly so when the rest of the neighbors are just watching and maybe cheering a little.

*Yes, this is somewhat hyperbolic. I'm sure we've managed to not completely screw the pooch a few times. Can't really recall any, but they've got to be out there somewhere.

Pick your poison.
Yup, my poison is: Let them suck it up. They want the middle east, at this point, they can bloody well have it. Couple decades of that and maybe everyone-but-the-US will be horrified enough to actually chip in worth a damn. Or maybe nothing will happen or the whole place will go up in fire or rainbows will spout from ISIS's ass and there'll be peace and happiness and equality and goddamn ponies. I'm beyond the point of caring so long as it gets the US out of the leadership position (and, more importantly, primary/major bankroller) of that mess.

17801
The Middle East either has to deal with strongmen, who can be brutal but at least keep border stability, or it needs someone to babysit it. Do we really want Russia or China to be doing the babysitting?
Is that white man's burden I smell? Even if it isn't -- you know what? Let Russia or China do the damned babysitting. What the states are doing isn't working, is generally making the situation worse, and is categorically making things worse for us. Fuck. It. If it takes one of the less subtle powers coming in and screwing the area even harder before the rest of the world pulls their heads out their asses and does something about it -- then: Fine. Whatever gets us less engaged in the area. Rest of the world wants to wring their hands about how much damage or what the hell ever results from that, the rest of the world can try their own damned hand at fixing it.

Quote
Yes, the US really fucked up in Iraq and Afghanistan. Yes, interventionism is expensive. Yes, it makes enemies. But we're now seeing what happens when we remove the threat of intervention: desperate strongmen using sarin gas on their own people to try and protect their own position while a nihilistic, terrorist ultra-theocracy springs up in the vacuum and creates a living nightmare. You cannot tell the Middle East to pull itself up by its bootstraps; it doesn't have any boots.
But you can damn sure let everyone else know that if they don't start helping pull harder, the ME can just bloody burn -- and I'm well past the point of advocating doing just that. Because, you know what? Desperate strongmen and terrorist ultra-theocracies are either a global issue, that can receive a global response -- and no, not the half-assed non-response we've generally seen -- or they're not, it's not our freaking problem, and the whole area can just goddamn sink -- or swim, or whatever. I don't mind the US helping, but much of the shit going on over there is fundamentally someone else's problem and needs to be dealt with as such.

Quote
More broadly, the current world order, and geopolitical stability, actually rely on the US being able to project force worldwide, even if it's for the wrong reasons or done by dimwitted Dominionists who can't tell Sunnis from Shiites.
Time to either pull out the rug and let them stop relying on us or start working toward doing just that, then! Not the states' frakking place to play geopolitical linchpin.

17802
Yeah, a lot of it does. Which, y'know, I'd say needs to freaking stop. Don't mind the country helping out or whatev', but shouldering a significant amount of the burden while the rest of the world just sits on their thumbs and functionally diddles themselves is getting more than a little old.

Kudos to them for convincing the states to bleed themselves like this, but it's long past time for the states to step down from this leading the world police bullshit and let the rest of the world shoulder more of the burden. To say nothing about stopping the outright dickery that's not even part of the facsimile of playing international sheriff. Been fed up with this shit since about two seconds into the initial Afghan mobilization back in early 2000s, personally.

17803
Would be if the US said: No, fuck it, you folks deal with it, we're out. Y'all can have some experts and we'll help train and maybe lend some tech or whatever, but someone else's turn to foot the bill.

Which we seriously should at this point, or at least be working toward. Should have a long damn time ago. We got other things to do besides further fuck over the middle east, damnit.

17804
Invasion of Afghanistan: The sequel is probably going to happen with the assassination of a US general.
... major general, which isn't quite the same thing -- couple ranks below general, actually, if I'm reading things correctly. Also, that article didn't seem to actually say who was killed -- all I'm seeing (from that article, and checking others) is that the coalition is saying one is dead and several wounded, with no mention whatsoever as to who they are beyond naming one of the wounded as a german brigadier general.

E: Regardless, I'll be surprised and viciously, incredibly pissed off if something like that is enough to stop us from continuing to pull out. Said it before and will say again: Incredibly goddamn tired of the US sticking its dick in the middle east. Let the UN or freaking whatever deal with that shit.

17805
My vote would be for Ungoliant. Spiders for everyone, ahahahaha! Unending hunger and the freaky cannibalistic incest would be downsides, but I think I could live with that.

Pages: 1 ... 1185 1186 [1187] 1188 1189 ... 1929