I said no such thing -- that's not lying. That's being upfront about having a closed-door meeting. "I'm not going to tell you what was said in this negotiation" is not a lie if you then proceed to not tell people what was said in that negotiation. It's not even misleading at all.
Except you've pretty directly stated you don't believe they're representing the people behind those closed doors. And that they
shouldn't have the burden of doing so, because apparently they can't get anything done if they're actually unerringly representing the will of their constituency. Except now you're saying that any variation from the people's will should get them kicked out. You do see the inconsistence here, right? A closed door meeting --
anything related to their elected position -- where things are done in a way their "election persona" (Read: This is what their constituency desires.) wouldn't allow is, in your words, breaking the implicit promise to the constituency, which is wrong, a lie, and should not be allowed.