Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Frumple

Pages: 1 ... 1270 1271 [1272] 1273 1274 ... 1929
19066
Heh. Iirc, lemuria can get their first consul on turn... three? And then another something like every 2-3 turns later, more or less forever.* I'm not sure how many it would take to murder an unkitted, mostly spell-less, dragon, but I doubt it would be many.

Ermor would be screwed, though. They've got arguably better casters (in terms of gem efficiency, iirc.), but what they don't have is a zero research, half cost, self-blessing might-as-well-be-a-wraith lord.

*To which one asks, naturally, "But research!" to which the lemurian responds, "A dozen wraith lords on your front door by turn 25. Good luck!" Alternately: Indie researchers.

19067
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: April 08, 2014, 11:21:18 am »
I find your wording here extremely confusing.
Fair enough. Put more clearly: One of the arguments against the female orgasm coming about as an evolutionary pressure towards reproductive sex is that it's terrible at actually occurring during the process. Something like a third of all women never experience orgasm, regardless of method, or only do so very rarely. Of the remaining 2/3rds, only somewhere between half and a quarter experience one with any degree of likelihood during penetrative sex -- that is, somewhere between 50 and 75% (I've forgotten the exact number, but it was 50+%, yes.) of that remainder either don't or aren't likely to experience orgasm during reproductive sex. And there's not really much of a notable difference in frequency or likelihood of having sex between any of the varying permutations, from what I recall.

To say the phenomena is supposed to incentivise reproductive congress when for something either approaching or notably beyond a majority of women it doesn't occur during such, and it's not particularly likely to cause more when it does is... unlikely, y'know?

19068
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: April 08, 2014, 08:34:33 am »
Then again, if sleeping with a dude -feels nice-, you'll probably do it more? And hey presto, one of those future times you get knocked up. So there's a bit of evolutionary pressure.
This. I've never understood the argument that female orgasm is an evolutionary fluke. Motivation is motivation, even if it's not strictly necessary to the process.
Yeah... there's more to it*, but at least part of the reason it's likely an evolutionary fluke -- or, more precisely, exists in ladies because the physiological reaction is incredibly strongly selected for in fella's, kinda' like the whole nipple thing in reverse -- is... well, you realize that something like a third of women, don't? Or do so very rarely. And that actual, y'know, penetrative sex, is fairly unlikely to cause one? Forgetting the exact numbers, but it was found** that something like half to three quarters of ladies that do experience it, don't (or, at least, seldom) from th'act of reproductive intercourse (which they still get up to plenty, mind. Still feels good, and there's other reasons besides.).

Basically, if it is adaptive, it's really not doing a good job at motivating sleeping with a dude.

*Seriously, look into it. I was personally introduced to the subject of the research et al involved by Lloyd's book. I remember it having an issue or two, but it did a bloody good job of laying out several of the problems surrounding research into the phenomena and regarding an adaptive explanation (which was/is basically the normal assumption) specifically.
**Once some researchers that didn't have their heads up their metaphorical experimental methodology arse started doing some work.

19069
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you sad today thread.
« on: April 07, 2014, 11:25:42 pm »
There are more cannibal serial killers out there (and we're certainly more likely to hear about them) than there are people who demonstrably save hundreds of lives.
More likely to hear about them, sure, but more of them? I'd wager good odds the average EMT is going to save at least a couple dozen lives over the course of their career, and there's a lot more EMTs than cannibal serial killers. And y'damn sure better believe the work those folks take on qualify as extravagant. Maybe not saving hundreds of lives in the process, but a dozen here and there add up faster than the average serial killing streak. And y've got more doctors, more nurses, more folks giving food and shelter to th'needy and whatnot. Less visible, definitely, but actually less? Don't particularly buy that. My guess would be they just make worse news, especially when they make a life or livelihood out of it. One critter going on a killing spree once is more attention grabbing than someone who saves the lives of several people a month for years.

19070
General Discussion / Re: Emperor Norton's Imperial Politics Megathread
« on: April 07, 2014, 11:04:29 pm »
Let it never be said that the average american knows or gives a damn about the geography of anywhere outside the united states. Honestly, it's less important to folks who have an area roughly the size of some continents (*cougheuropecough*) where they know they can go pretty much anywhere in and largely have little to no difficulty settling in. Who cares where Ohio actually is if driving into it and living there isn't really all that different from living anywhere else (in the places you care to go for any extended period, heh.)?

I guess if you wanted to actually reach that place specifically it would be an issue (Ha, google maps says otherwise~), but being able to just randomly drive for several hundred miles, stop, get out, buy property and kick back for the next decade without worry about silly things like language or major cultural shifts or being in another country just... devalues the importance of geography, y'know?

19071
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: April 07, 2014, 08:17:34 pm »
The mechanism itself might have evolved, but, as it is, it seems women only orgasm as an evolutionary fluke.

Could be worse. The way cats cause that to happen is... eurgh.
Yeeeup. Last I ran into decent research on the subject (and, fyi, research into the female orgasm actually has a kinda' fascinating methodological history -- it is more full of fuck than the physical process itself. Much of it was basically bollocks until quite recently, haha!) the female orgasm probably falls roughly into the same evolutionary niche as the male nipple. Literally only there because the other half the species has actual use for it. Benefit to the other gender strictly coincidental, heh. Not to say it's not nice, mind, but the evolutionary pressure for it to exist likely didn't come from the female side of things.

19072
Other Games / Re: Dominions 4: Thrones of Ascension
« on: April 07, 2014, 05:32:32 pm »
Dunno about vs humans, but vs CPU it's kinda' a cinch. The combo of mindblasters* and their tankier chaff (crab hybrids, shambler thralls) tends to completely wreck the underwater provinces, after which you've probably got a nice base to spew more mindblasters and chaff at everything above ground, too. Throw in the quite nice casters (including really nice spammy stuff like the star children! Cheap s1 assassins? Yeshplox. Gonna' magic dual me some mofos. All the mofos.) and the occasionally wickedly powerful gate summons (Bring a pretender with enough N to get GoR, or some other means of providing it, for some truly vicious commanders) on top of the whole "ridiculous amounts of astral" is just... they've got hella' punch. R'lyeh's pretty sexy, as water nations go, imo.

Basically, I'd probably say don't worry too much about finesse with R'yleh, at least to start. They've got some incredibly huge bludgeons you could be waving about instead, and get pretty far with it. and then they don't expect the wishdagger to the spine, nyohoho.

*A particularly big deal in underwater fights. You're basically the only thing bringing the ranged game to the fight down there, to any meaningful degree, until at least mid game.

19073
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: April 07, 2014, 05:13:05 pm »
Today I learned that BBQ corn chips go well in ramen. Well, technically a vaguely unholy mix of ramen, mashed potatoes, and shredded pepperoni and cheese, but whatever. It was disturbingly good.

19074
No... there's places like that in the states, as SE noted. Place I grew up in wasn't far from it. Not quite as bad -- actual violence didn't occur to any great degree (though it did occur, mind) -- but a difference of degrees instead of kind. North Florida, for what that's worth. There's little insular places like that dotted all over the country.

As for anime watchers being targeted, well... "Weaboo faggot gonna' get 'is legs broke," etc. It's less anything to do with anime specifically and more with it offering someone an excuse to target someone else. Places like these... they tend to become very Us vs Them, and "Them" is free game for, well, a lot. Gods help you if you're born there and don't fit the localized mold.

19075
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: April 06, 2014, 08:26:03 pm »
]What's the point of a clothes dryer if the washing machine breaks? You'd still have to replace a device.

Having a washing machine without a dryer makes a -little- more sense, but if you don't live in a place where you can easily dry your clothes, it's still a bother.
You can wash elsewhere (laundromat, neighbor, etc.) and haul it back quicklike to use own dyer. If the place-of-washing is close enough, you probably save money that way, and almost definitely save time (at least assuming time spent idling at home is better than time spent idling in a laundromat equivalent).

Can also always do it by hand, I guess, and then have convenient drying. You can get some use out of it until you can afford to replace the washer.

19076
Plenty of people boycott a company for considerably more trivial things *shrugs*

The only one who gets to decide if a company is "worthy" of boycott is the person deciding to no longer do business/interact with them. I've seen local level shit because a business hired someone distantly related to someone other people didn't like.

19077
Other Games / Re: League of Legends - Patch 3.14 - Preseason
« on: April 06, 2014, 01:08:14 pm »
Bullet hell AoS sounds like it would be a thing of splendor and awe, if taking a minor miracle to actually get functioning decently.

19078
General Discussion / Re: I like anime, do you like anime?
« on: April 06, 2014, 11:32:36 am »
It honestly strikes me as kinda' weird. Hasn't most of the anime with the word samurai in it that made it overseas been pretty decent? Kenshin's dub name was silly, but the show itself was alright. Then you've got Champloo, Afro, and Pizza Cats, at which point my memory stops working. Mostly what I'd call quality of one sort or another.

19079
General Discussion / Re: [wot m8?] avin a giggle m8? (Happy thread?!)
« on: April 06, 2014, 10:25:39 am »
Try Libreoffice, maybe? I work with excel sheets in it pretty regularly. Usually some formatting issues, but I haven't seen any crashes.

19080
Here's the thing I think you're not getting, at least about my problem with this. This wasn't a boycott. Companies specifically inserted code to refuse to let other people use the product and enjoy their services.

People not only said 'I don't like this guy and what he does, so I'm not going to use his product... but I'm going to take active measure to prevent other people from using his product too.
Glyph... people in the software business do that all the time. Specifically engineering compatibility issues -- either by directly blocking the service (there's multiple games, ferex, that will refuse to run if Process Explorer is open), or making sure your software cannot interact through other means (See: Microsoft's latest document formats or Quickbook's refusal to work with any spreadsheet software that's not Excel) -- is bloody close to standard practice these days. And they're perfectly in the right to do so, though it's goddamn horrifically terrible design methodology. They have no obligation to include or not include whatever features they please in their software -- up to and including engineered incompatibility with other software. If their market doesn't like it, they're welcome to use a different product.

It... it's okay if you don't want your software interacting with someone else's. That's the programmer's prerogative, and they have as much right to refuse to work (Blacklist, whatever.) with another company as the consumer has to boycott. It's frankly the exact same thing, just a company doing it instead of an individual. In cases like this, it's even a potentially good business move -- you've got a non-zero chance to snipe some market share from a competitor by doing so and appealing to the portion of the market that wants absolutely nothing to do with Mozilla.

Pages: 1 ... 1270 1271 [1272] 1273 1274 ... 1929