Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Frumple

Pages: 1 ... 132 133 [134] 135 136 ... 1929
1996
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you sad today thread.
« on: February 04, 2022, 08:10:26 am »
Why the fuck someone would stop being friend of someone else because that person is dying? Unless is from a zombie plague there is no excuse man. I dont joke when I say lots of you here are considered friends by me.
Stress, mostly. Least from what I've seen in my life. Like, I haven't done it, but there's been days I've very seriously considered just fucking off to the other end of the country and leaving my grandparents (different situations, being old age and dementia and me the primary caretaker instead of just a friend, but still, their clock is very clearly ticking down) behind for other people to deal with, because trying to handle everything involved is pretty literally killing me (started blood pressure medication last night, haha!).

Sometimes when all the shit piles up and you don't really know what the fuck to do, folks will cut ties with what they're troubled by instead of figuring out other ways to deal with it, even if it means basically leaving a friend in a ditch. It sucks and it's generally a pretty shitty thing to do, but, like... I get it, y'know? I understand how someone can do it. When you're buried by everything else and got the extra shit sandwich of having friends or family die on you it's really fucking tempting to just... not. You'd probably feel a bit bad in some ways but in others it'd be such a goddamn relief, out of sight and out of mind, etc.

1997
... well, I will say my favorite solution (that, uh, I'm not sure I've ever actually seen implemented, closest being maybe something like Distant Worlds or Dominions surrender-to-AI thing :P) to map painting, especially end-game you-must-clean-up-your-mess-to-win busywork is to just... automate that shit. Really heavily. Give me a button on basically everything of note that I can press and say to the game's AI, "I don't want to bother with this anymore, you deal with it." If something's annoying me, personally, let me have a way to slide it off the screen and stop thinking about it. From what I understand it's largely a time-inefficient pain in the ass on the developer's end, but... y'know, I'm not on that end, ahaha.

So far as continuing to make things interesting post blob, well, if you can't give me opponents anymore start letting me make my own problems. If I'm a world spanning ork horde, by the dark gods I should be able to unleash an undead apocalypse over trivial nuisances and then have to figure out how to deal with the runaway bone buddies brigade that just took over the planet's southern hemisphere. We're on the DF forums, of course most of us here want to dig too deep in more settings than just this one game. We should be able to pester our advisors until they rise up in rebellion, then defect to their side and crush the once great empire. So on and so forth. Doesn't apply as well to less fantastic settings, but they hold negative interest for me in regards to strategy games and I basically don't play them, so :V

Alternate take on that one is almost Spore like (or, perhaps more accurately, like a cultivation novel), where once you blob and take over the world whoops turns out you're just one tiny planet in a very active galaxy, guess what you get to do now :V

... and then you take over the galaxy and hey, you're not the only galactic superpower. Oopsie, conquered the galactic supercluster, but wait, there's more! Rule the universe with an iron fist and some idiot magitek engineer cracks open a hole to another. It just keeps going. That'd probably be pretty neat, too. Hell to develop, but neat.

Yeah pretty much. In my project I tried to design a fun imperfect information system. Aside from mechanical challenges you always have to consider whether players of traditional strategy/war games would enjoy it.
One thing it's good to remember sometimes, is that you don't necessarily have to care if players of traditional strategy/war games would enjoy it, especially from the perspective of coming from said games.

First and foremost, plenty of folks that indulge in that kind of thing would be perfectly fine with some degree (even a lot) of innovation or different takes. Some of us just really want something other than modern military or mundane medieval cruft, ferex. Beyond that, there's more players out there than of traditional strategy/war games (rather a lot more, from what I understand of the proverbial market, even). Don't worry too much about stepping on stodgy, hidebound toes, just worry about making something that works.

1998
General Discussion / Re: The Big Random Questions Thread
« on: February 03, 2022, 09:12:57 pm »
... why not? It's a pretty horsecrap saying, generally trying to either pigeonhole you (implies other stuff you might want to do isn't), downplay your efforts (assigning to nature or someone else's designs your accomplishments), or give credit to someone or something questionably related to the issue (generally, but not always, some god).

Tries to minimize your work and whatnot, assign it to some other creator or crafter. It's often not much of a compliment, if at all. Lots of stuff that gets (or used to get) said plenty could stand a good debunking.

1999
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: February 03, 2022, 08:12:59 pm »
That feeling when you suddenly realize why the terminology looked so familiar, and figure out the magic system what you're reading is using was largely lifted... from a minecraft mod.

Work is Owlnother World, fairly decent animal isekai thing (person unsurprisingly reincarnated into an owl, this time) with some litrpg elements... and a magic system substantially borrowed from Thaumcraft. It translates pretty well to writing, but still. I definitely think it was improved from me not immediately noticing, though -- it namedrops the Thaumonomicon fairly early, but if you don't recognize it things probably flow a bit better.

2000
It seems to be down to where it was... last year? That reads more like it went 125%-100% rather than 100%-75% :-\

Neat to see what appears to be panicked flailing from the social media sector, though, ha.

2001
General Discussion / Re: The Big Random Questions Thread
« on: February 02, 2022, 09:34:47 pm »
Man wasn't made, and the sweet spot is a moving target. Questions without actual answers.

2002
prince of orange is on its way to a speedy recovery

evaporate better
this smells like delightful citrus regicide

2003
It'd be an interesting script considering it'd have to run, what, twenty something times, skipping around servers to follow time zone changes.

Though that's not really maximal. Maximal would be figuring out how to lay claim to and dictate the calendar system for another stellar body, so that instead of counting up, the year starts at 2222 and just adds another 2 at the end for each passing year. Adjust the days and weeks to add more twos, too, for that matter.

or, no, no

it would have 9 months, and tell the date by number of digits, each month changing the number. So first month, first day, first year, would be 1/1/1, first month, second day, second year, would be 1/11/11, third month, fifth day, tenth year would be 3/33333/3333333333, and so on. It'd be amazingly awful :D

2004
Yeah, basically. Just... in your house. Mostly it occurred to me I can't recall any ergonomic type studies on bathing areas, but, like... they have to exist, right? Beyond absolutely everything else involved, it's literally one of the most dangerous areas in buildings if you're talking by number of accidents that occur in them. There's got to be some sort of ongoing effort to try to reign that in, if nothing else.

2005
oh hey, the thing piles of people thought was likely to happen, happened
who would have thunk it, the consequences of their actions :V

2006
I'm not sure we really were built for baths, though? At a minimum not how they're usually designed. Basically nothing about your standard bath design looks like much of anything you find outside of human construction, really.

The standing bathing thing (i.e. shower) actually looks a lot like what we do in sufficiently deep rivers or lakes, y'know?

e: though i'm definitely wondering what the proper ergonomics of a bathing area would look like going by unmodified environments... river shaped bath? Ground stream with squatting and whatnot? The smooth textured stuff obviously has to go -- it's blatantly maladjusted for human use, made plain by how many injures are related to it -- but what else gets involved? Someone has to have done studies on what causes the least (or best sorts of!) stress while thoroughly cleaning.

2007
General Discussion / Re: How can we avoid an excessive future?
« on: January 31, 2022, 05:18:44 pm »
There's a thought. Pervasive augmented reality streamlining your day to day life! Advanced prosthetics adjusting your physical capabilities for a better user experience!

A whole host of lifestyle enhancement augmentations may be available in our future. I'm sure nothing can go wrong, there :V

Alternatively, trust in hypnotoad, I guess. They'd at least make sure you landed in life advice comfortably, probably.

2008
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: January 31, 2022, 02:33:40 pm »
Sorta,' except stale cheetos have more flavor :P

Close enough to get the meaning across, though, sure.

2009
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: January 31, 2022, 02:24:53 pm »
I have never heard of this, and I can't find any information about it from a quick search

I can't believe you missed the whole storming the capitol thing, which was very much alike the Munich Putsch.
I meant the legislation. Of course I heard about the storming attempt lmfao. A bunch of crazed alt-righters do not the whole party make.
Here's one example in Arizona. Iirc there's been similar moves in a few other states (Georgia, one of the carolinas? Isn't at the top of my head), trying to empower the legislature or executive with the ability to just functionally or explicitly yeet election results if they don't like them.

2010
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: January 31, 2022, 08:24:55 am »
Fascism requires totalitarianism. Without totalitarianism, it is simply conservatism. Never once has the USA been totalitarian.
That doesn't mean the GOP isn't trying to make it so. There was literally a putsch attempt last year. They're actively trying to put in legislature that lets them overturn elections at will, right now. Somewhere between a large minority to straight supermajority of their party, depending on the exact issue, has been willing to say they're okay with this.

Most of the actual moderate republicans have left the party -- what remains is near to entirely okay with turning the US into a one party dictatorship, and attempts by their affiliated politicians to do just that have not turned them away hard enough to stop them from supporting the party at the poll booth and beyond. The GOP is a bloody long way from just being conservative.

Pages: 1 ... 132 133 [134] 135 136 ... 1929