Bay 12 Games Forum

Hammers, lucky hits... are y'all sure you're running PCs? You've got a bunch of drunks and apparently copious amounts of alcohol. If this scenario doesn't call for arson and immolation I'm not sure what does. Sure, it might be only, what, 1d4 per round or some nonsense, but if they're already spontaneously failing reflex saves just to stand up, I don't think them getting out will be an issue.

And if it is, well, then you bring out the hammer. Gotta' be some penalties to trying to dodge a hit while on fire, at least for level 1 drunks.

Quote from: MaximumZero on November 01, 2013, 12:20:51 am

Level 1 drunks only have like...15 hit points, tops. My kid with a hammer could do that much damage.

... By Pelor, what do you feed your kid! Even a warhammer only deals 1d8 damage. That's a hell of a Strength bonus.

Could be some kind of odd racial/class feat. Extra damage to larger size creatures.

Bump for heimer update.

All I know is in my initial bot go, I was not unimpressed. Also those new(?) circle thingies make figuring out where to drop the 'rets just outside of tower range a lot easier. And... I, like. Never used the ult. New rockets are surprisingly painful, speed upgrade (it felt like, anyway) on grenade toss was nice. Rets seem to wreck waves a lot easier (plus three out right off the bat? Damn.). Just... a lot of good stuff, it feels like to me. Rets do seem a bit flimsier, though.

Still. Heimer got some love. All praise the dinging.

E: It also kinda' feels like the 'ret damage's scaling, if not base, has increased somewhat. Either that or those lasers are seriously doing some work. The 'rets feel like a much bigger threat against champs than they used to be, especially if you walk into a fully charged three stack and don't manage to juke.

"None at all" would still make most people I'm aware of somewhat concerned. It's one of those things not oft talked about, but when it's missing (so to speak) people look on in askance.

Haha, and if you weren't aware, AGTP did a translation. Great game, it is.

Pet iguana for a bit, pet boa constrictor for a fair while longer (both died to someone foolish getting control of taking care of them ). Had someone in the family that kept a very young alligator (fairly sure the statute of limitations is over for that one >_> S'been well over a decade.*) for... a few months, I think? Until it started getting too big. They're really cute when they're young and don't really try to eat you. Turtles of various sorts all throughout the years.

Reptiles make pretty neat pets, in my experience. Definitely less trouble maintenance wise than most mammals or birds (worst of it was temperature control, iirc), if less fuzzy. Still an awesome tactile experience, but definitely a different one.

*And if not, well. It wasn't me, and I'm not entirely sure how many tears I'd shed over the one that it was going to jail again.

The goddess of hookers may partake of the form those those she blows. The effect lingers, and persists across incarnations. By recalling the appropriate memories, Sirus may, indeed, become a T-Rex.

He doesn't, though. That would mean remembering exactly what the goddess of hookers was getting up to back in the Cretaceous period.

I'm... relatively certain they occasional do (/have done) stuff like that last bit? Hearing of someone that has to travel an hour or more to find someone that their insurance is willing to work with (/are willing to work with their insurance) -- when there's plenty of medical care providers closer -- is something I hear about... not exactly regularly, but often enough it triggers commiseration instead of befuddlement, both with me and anyone else who might be involved in the conversation.

E:I'm not sure, but what seems to be that might be a fundamental flaw in your reasoning is the apparent assumption (which I may definitely be misreading, it's late and I'm tired) that the hospitals and insurance companies actually give a shit about the non-fiscal outcomes of their decisions. Some of the ground workers may, but the ones pulling the strings... that stuff only matters strictly to the extent it impacts their profit margins, by and large. If they can pull out an extra 1% on the net by starving a rural county or five out of medical care for a few years, they will. If it means putting hundreds or thousands out of medical care or local medical care... too damn bad. Health care's not what either of the string pullers on either side are there to do, y'know? That just happens to be how they go about doing what they do, in this particular market.

And they've got spin doctors that put the Red Tornado to shame, both groups. These are people that fairly regularly completely wreck families and homes and come out smelling like daisies. Something as minor as starving a city or a few counties of service is basically penny ante crap for the medical and insurance industries.

... highlight the cells with the data, insert -> Desired graph?

I mean, there's some annoying bits with how excel works with graphs but unless you're trying to do something rather fancy it's... usually not that bad?

... hell, push comes to shove, if you're still having trouble with it tomorrow, upload it to google or something. If I'm on campus, I could check the file and walk y'through it, more than likely. Or someone with actual home excel access could.