21106
General Discussion / Re: Let's talk Capitalism.
« on: September 23, 2013, 09:15:45 am »
Will let LB clarify (or not, as he pleases) his own position, but... are they? Almost certainly they're going to be inefficient -- how much gets thrown out on a daily basis, how much goes to waste, that could be avoided if it were a single operation (or they collaborated, which may have actually been happening)? How much less would the startup and maintenance costs have been if there was only one shop instead of several? And absolutely they're redundant, since you've got several providers of the same service in the same area... that's pretty close to the definition of redundancy.
Whether they're pointless or not... insofar as that goes, for what it's worth, I'm fairly sure LB was referring to the sort of thing that goes on more in the states, than the situation you're more familiar with. Work situation in a small mom and pops or whathaveyou can be considerably different than in a chain store or somethin' (though I don't believe that's the point LB was making, re: pointlessness). But... as a mental exercise, try to justify their existence. What's the point of the businesses being there, and how is (is?) that point intrinsic to the business itself? Is it an insult to question that?
In any case, there's just... not really insult in calling something redundant and pointless if it largely is, y'know? And I personally wouldn't hold it against people if that's what they end up having to do to get by. More criticism for the systems that forces people in that situation than the people forced into them. Don't conflate the businesses with the people runnin' 'em, yeah?
And to caveat things, I'm not saying that what you were familiar with was pointless. I don't know the situation enough to say either way, really. S'just... maybe you might be overreacting a titch, M? Reading more into what LB's saying than he was saying.
Whether they're pointless or not... insofar as that goes, for what it's worth, I'm fairly sure LB was referring to the sort of thing that goes on more in the states, than the situation you're more familiar with. Work situation in a small mom and pops or whathaveyou can be considerably different than in a chain store or somethin' (though I don't believe that's the point LB was making, re: pointlessness). But... as a mental exercise, try to justify their existence. What's the point of the businesses being there, and how is (is?) that point intrinsic to the business itself? Is it an insult to question that?
In any case, there's just... not really insult in calling something redundant and pointless if it largely is, y'know? And I personally wouldn't hold it against people if that's what they end up having to do to get by. More criticism for the systems that forces people in that situation than the people forced into them. Don't conflate the businesses with the people runnin' 'em, yeah?
And to caveat things, I'm not saying that what you were familiar with was pointless. I don't know the situation enough to say either way, really. S'just... maybe you might be overreacting a titch, M? Reading more into what LB's saying than he was saying.
