[snip]
... you seem to be assuming that lack of copyright necessarily entails lack of recognition, Vec, and that FOSS-style systems are going to turn those working within them into "cogs of someone else's message". Doesn't tend to work like that, from what I've seen (and it offers a good platform to get help gearing up one's
own message). And it doesn't necessarily entail lack of recompense, either. Toady's a bit of an aberration, but donation driven or heavily supported efforts seem to be becoming more common. In a hypothetical where the current commercial option is a possibility, you'd almost certainly see more of that.
Those structures create different kinds of art than a single person working on their own vision, and they aren't prohibited by the existence of copyright or other IP law, so I'm not really sure how they're relevant.
LB was bringing up a world sans copyright/without the kind of structures that produce big commercial games. Relevance comes because, well, those structures are how that sort of thing gets produced without commercial backing.
In any case, I haven't particularly noticed the copyright/etc. force being much better at getting single people working on their own vision out there than anything else. Usually the most it does is make it easier to obscure the efforts of those that supported 'em, least as I've seen.
So your answer, in less words, is "it could totally happen! You just have to take my word for it!" instead of explaining how it would work.
Look to stuff like Open Morrowind. Point was, s'far as I could tell, that, hey, crowdsourcing and related efforts
might just be able to do some pretty big stuff. People'll do things without direct monetary motivation sometimes.
If you would give over your labour/time/skillset for free you are a chump.
... so the world's volunteers are... chumps. Right