I read something about rising the budget or debt limit some more trillions to plant trees?
Would not be better to put that money on carbon secuestrers?
Trees are one of the most cost effect carbon sequestration methods currently available, iirc. Just planting shedloads of the things is a fairly effective proposal, from what I understand... maybe not optimal, but fairly achievable logistics wise and an easy message to push.
Near as I can recall it wouldn't take trillions of dollars to plant enough of them to basically stall rising temperatures, though (it's only like 30c to the tree or something like that; you'd have to plant multiple trillions of trees to cost trillions of dollars, and we probably only need around a trillion or so of the things to begin with, with the proposals I've noticed), so wherever you heard that specifically was probably pretty sketchy, or it was put backwards or something.
... also not a major component of the debt limit increase regardless, so far as I'm aware, so yeah.