26776
General Discussion / Re: Online Piracy
« on: February 03, 2012, 07:29:05 pm »I believe it's a result of the piracy issue being discussed in terms of who looses [sic] out of pocket, due to the capitalist society revolving around the exchange and movement of cashflows.Pretty much exactly this. The harm being done is strongly presented in lost sales, on the part anti-piracy advocates. The moral aspect is considerably weaker if there's not significant financial damage being done, because the moral infraction isn't much (if at all) greater than sharing a book or CD. The lost sales focus is a matter of addressing the heuristic being presented.
Rather than the moral issues involved.
[snip]Cript, you misrepresent me somewhat

I actually think the facts are there (or will be in the near future), just not easily accessible to the public. I would be very surprised if there's not a number of academic journal articles (and/or studies) on the subject. Many of which are difficult (or at least expensive, which is places it outside my capability at the moment) for someone outside of higher education to get access to.
Though the should-not-assume thing still applies fairly well. Good statistics trumps reason when we're dealing with the subject we're dealing with. Ideally, we'd be getting facts from all sides of the discussion; reasonable doesn't necessarily absolve burden of proof. You also presented the 90% figure on world of goo, implying you've got at least some numbers to provide. How was that number acquired?
But, that said. What do you want to do (in terms of continuing the discussion) if you take the lost sales as a given? "Some" lost sales isn't enough to bring moral condemnation down on a subject, I wouldn't say. If it were, then bad reviews or demos would (or could, at least) be about as bad morally as outright piracy.
