Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Frumple

Pages: 1 ... 1784 1785 [1786] 1787 1788 ... 1929
26776
General Discussion / Re: Online Piracy
« on: February 03, 2012, 07:29:05 pm »
I believe it's a result of the piracy issue being discussed in terms of who looses [sic] out of pocket, due to the capitalist society revolving around the exchange and movement of cashflows.
Rather than the moral issues involved.
Pretty much exactly this. The harm being done is strongly presented in lost sales, on the part anti-piracy advocates. The moral aspect is considerably weaker if there's not significant financial damage being done, because the moral infraction isn't much (if at all) greater than sharing a book or CD. The lost sales focus is a matter of addressing the heuristic being presented.

[snip]
Cript, you misrepresent me somewhat ;)

I actually think the facts are there (or will be in the near future), just not easily accessible to the public. I would be very surprised if there's not a number of academic journal articles (and/or studies) on the subject. Many of which are difficult (or at least expensive, which is places it outside my capability at the moment) for someone outside of higher education to get access to.

Though the should-not-assume thing still applies fairly well. Good statistics trumps reason when we're dealing with the subject we're dealing with. Ideally, we'd be getting facts from all sides of the discussion; reasonable doesn't necessarily absolve burden of proof. You also presented the 90% figure on world of goo, implying you've got at least some numbers to provide. How was that number acquired?

But, that said. What do you want to do (in terms of continuing the discussion) if you take the lost sales as a given? "Some" lost sales isn't enough to bring moral condemnation down on a subject, I wouldn't say. If it were, then bad reviews or demos would (or could, at least) be about as bad morally as outright piracy.

26777
Well, the question wasn't what they are doing, but what they should be doing :P

What's the concept behind it? What powers are they suppose to have, what oversight does the community have over it, etc.

The closest I have to an understanding of it is that the board is basically there to represent the community's interests in regard to the local education systems, hence it's an elected position (and least where I'm at... I think, anyway). But I don't know how it does that, what sort of oversight it has, what codes of conduct it must adhere to, etc., so forth, so on. I don't even know if my basic understanding is accurate; they could be there to liaison between the community and the schools (both ways, instead of community -> school), they could be there simple to disseminate and make understandable what's occurring in the schools (school -> community).

That sort of information isn't terribly complicated, I don't think. Not looking for minutia, just a plain english terms of service, yanno'? What's the pamphlet version of what these folks (not just school boards, but general local-level elected and appointed positions) are supposed to be doing and how I get to interact with them?

26778
Yeah, that bit about ignorance is a fairly good point. I'm not entirely sure what the hell a county commissioner does either, and my grandfather was mayor of the town I live in for a few years. I'm also at least partially college educated. Still don't know this shit, and I've never had it come up in any class I've been in.

Don't know what a lot of the local positions entail, really. What the hell does the school board actually do? Waste management? You get some broad strokes from the title, sometimes, but nothing specific. No one's bothered to bring it up and I've never really been interested in the local politics (beyond avoiding the frak out of it, because the majority of the people in this area are various forums of bigoted filth).

So, yeah. Is there like a pamphlet or something for this crap?

26779
General Discussion / Re: Online Piracy
« on: February 03, 2012, 04:10:34 pm »
That's a great thought Frumple. Would you be willing to start us out with that?
Nope :P

That's the major reason why I've not been chiming in much. Don't have the numbers to back anything up and am without ready access to (reputable) academic sources at the moment. There's probably someone in a college/uni that provides journal access reading along that could dig some stuff up, though.

26781
General Discussion / Re: Online Piracy
« on: February 03, 2012, 03:52:11 pm »
I'd say that's not a reasonable assumption, no. It's also not reasonable to assume the other direction. No numbers, you see. What's the statistical variance between people who would buy if no illegitimate source was available versus people who wouldn't?

Until we can actually put a number on that (By a third party, not involved with either the pro or anti piracy groups), we're pretty much pulling everything out our ass. Well, that and about a dozen other things related to the subject.

Is there even anyone reputable and uninvolved attempting to track numbers on all this shit, anyway? Sale rate before/after illegit sources are available, sales vs. unique downloads of illegit. copies, disparity between physical and digital distribution of illegit. copies, difference in rates between first and third world countries, probably the dozen other variables that need to be tracked to get an actual picture of what's going on? There's got to be a few academic studies tracking this shtick by this point.

Because both sides are prone to yanking vague numbers from "sources" (which they either won't reveal, don't exist, are being bankrolled by someone heavily invested in the results, and/or using shitpoor methodology) from their nether regions.

Basically, reasonable is nice, but reasonable is trumped straight to hell by statistics when you're dealing with this sort of thing. Let's get some reason trumping in this discussion, people!

26782
Um, great, uh. Two URR posts above you. On this page. The one with the picture? Just up a bit? Yeah. I think you botched your spot check.

26783
Play With Your Buddies / Re: Let's Play Master of Mana (Civ4/FFH2)
« on: February 03, 2012, 01:55:59 pm »
Okay, yeah. Shift from not!Esirce to Zodalore. Dem ruffles. Or stay with not!Esirce, whatever. So long as Esirce loses out :P

... what gender is Z, anyway? I'm guessing female, but it could go either way.

26784
Other Games / Re: Fortune Summoner
« on: February 03, 2012, 10:05:58 am »
Don't have the full game, but re: Demo and getting arche to function well, I just switched control to the secondary character and played artillery. AI was pretty solid for keeping arche flapping about and murdering things, while not dying.

26785
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you sad today thread.
« on: February 02, 2012, 11:18:38 pm »
I'm losing any and all interest in dating and romantic relationships.  Like, at all.
*highfive*

Wait, is that bad? I can never hold any genuine interest in pursuing a romantic relationship for more than like five minutes (no crude jokes intended) and I've never really felt a sustained urge toward it in my life. I'm older than you Vec, by th'by.

Part of that's due to the area I'm in, but a lot of it... I'unno. Do people really need romantic/passionate/cohabitant relationships to live a happy and fulfilling life? I see a lot of people saying so, but no solid proof and plenty of counterexamples. Plenty of positive examples, too, but that just seems to reinforce that once can probably get by without it. Companionship might be needed, but this needlessly complex mating ritual type shenanigans a lot of us monkeys seem to be all aflutter about seems  kinda' superfluous to happiness.

In any case, no one really bothered to pass out the handbook for social interaction in my life, so winging it's been the default. I guess what I'm saying is if that's what happens for yeh, Vec, it's what happens. If you're still happy, why worry?

26786
General Discussion / Re: American Election Megathread
« on: February 02, 2012, 10:10:07 pm »
Some sort of sarcasm font or the like would probably cut down on the hate (ok, maybe diethate) on this thread by about %75
Perhaps impact? Oh gods, no. Not impact. Courier? *previews* That's... not as bad. I like the name of georgia, at least, and that's fairly readable. Perhaps Aqi would like to dictate an official sarcasm font for the thread? I'll just go ahead and nominate georgia.

26787
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: February 02, 2012, 10:07:15 pm »
Aw, look on the bright side True. By hoping you'll never have the incident cross your desk, you've damned yourself via Murphey fiat to that very thing. Even removing the post won't change that~

26788
Oh yeah... another thing I don't have, but I've had that stuff around in the past and it's done very well. I'll have to add it to my odds-and-ins mental list. Thanks for the reminder, heh.

26789
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you sad today thread.
« on: February 02, 2012, 07:32:34 pm »
Purpose is greater than ambition. Find something good to do, gain the skills you need, and then do it.

+1 for ambition-loss buddy, though. I lost that somewhere before puberty. Kept myself going forward with curiosity and finding interesting ways to spend time, mostly. Don't really feel the loss, and seeing what some people do to fulfill theres... ehn. I think I'm happier without ambition. Goals can be pretty effective even without the self-aggrandizement.

26790
Play With Your Buddies / Re: Let's Play Master of Mana (Civ4/FFH2)
« on: February 02, 2012, 05:59:34 pm »
My vote goes for not!Esirce. Diverse sounds amusing to me.

Pages: 1 ... 1784 1785 [1786] 1787 1788 ... 1929