Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Frumple

Pages: 1 ... 1791 1792 [1793] 1794 1795 ... 1929
26881
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you sad today thread.
« on: January 23, 2012, 09:25:41 pm »
Honestly, you wanna make friends? I sincerely recommend these people: http://www.toastmasters.org/
That... actually looks fairly interesting. Damn shame that the closest one to me is an hour's drive from here. Which is currently financially inviable for me to manage without some other reason to be in th'particular town :-\

Though it's not really speeches I have problems with, it's that... small talk thing. Hard to make conversation when you're completely uninterested in (if not almost outright reviled by) most of the common cultural interests... and have an almost 180 degree preference on weather. It's like... 'how about show X?' 'I... don't own a noisebox. Or watch TV shows.' 'Beautiful day, innit?' 'It's neither cold nor cloudy nor raining. Horrible day :(' 'So, uh...' 'Wanna' talk theology?' *cricket chirp* Not owning a TV has also lead to a fairly intense comfort with quiet, too. Don't mind talking about things, but I'm perfectly content to sit in silence. That seems to bother most folks, for some reason :P

S'just kinda' awkward, I guess. Knowing there's this odd social expectation for conversation but not really feeling the drive for it. Just being around other people who aren't likely to attack you is pretty soothing, really.

Anyway, sad thing of the day. Yet another resource not in my immediate area. Yaaay :-\

26882
General Discussion / Re: American Election Megathread
« on: January 23, 2012, 03:38:08 pm »
The sad thing is it took me a few minutes to notice
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
E: Something, damnit, not someone. I really need to eat something.

26883
General Discussion / Re: Parents or Childfree?
« on: January 23, 2012, 03:30:16 pm »
I would just say not to rush into the sterilization thing. I was deadset against children up into my late 20's. I eventually softened that stance, and I'm glad I did. (Now, I *am* slated to get snipped sometime this year because we don't want more than two, but that's a different matter entirely.)
Yeah, it took quite the long think to get to th'point I wanted sterilization.

Basically, I'd rather like to have children, but I am not going to put someone else in the position of having to choose between lifelong drug dependency or insanity/crippling-to-near-crippling mental issues, and there's a way-too-damn-high chance a biological child of mine would have to deal with exactly that. I absolutely refuse to see someone I'm supposed to love, care for, and be responsible for, over all other people in my life, have to suffer to the extent most of my family has. Especially when I can stop it from even being an issue. Anything else would be the height of irresponsibility -- and outright cruelty -- to me. M'not going to play a game of chance with someone else's life, yanno'?

It doesn't help that it'll probably be late 30s/early 40s before I'll be financially stable enough to really provide for a child :-\

Luckily in today's society we can bottle up our fertility and use it later in a controlled environment.
That's the other thought, too, especially if society's capable/willing to screen for a few things (and fix them, damnit) by the time I'm financially stable enough to be able to give a child a good home.

26884
General Discussion / Re: American Election Megathread
« on: January 23, 2012, 03:16:17 pm »
Sidenote:  Anybody willing to put their stones on the block and take a stab at who is going to win?  (The whole election, not just the republican side)
S'felt like the general consensus here is that Obama's probably going to take another four years, mostly because the republican candidates are utterly destroying themselves/are near-complete filth of one sort or another.

Hell, I can almost see support for the theory that the republican party has intentionally sabotaged their chances at getting a president in. Maybe they think they'll have a better chance getting legislature through under Obama than they would with (probably) better than half the voting constituency up in arms about whichever madman that wins the republican primary managing presidency.

I'm pretty sure a lot of people would be a lot less alert with Obama in power again than if one the current candidates managed it, really. It sorta' makes sense.

Though, of course, beware attributing malignancy to what can be attributed to incompetence, and all that. Most of the upper half or so of America's wealth bracket seems to be pretty damned disconnected with the lower half (Which makes up a majority of the population, iirc.), so maybe they really are that blind. Eh. We'll see how things go, anyway.

26885
General Discussion / Re: Parents or Childfree?
« on: January 23, 2012, 02:44:16 pm »
Sterilization of some sort as soon as I can afford it. Adoption might be on the table at some point in the future, but, without going into specific details, my family's got enough genetic frakups I would be a completely morally bankrupt individual to risk inflicting them on another human being.

26886
... /.5 = *2, innit? Calculator seems to think so.

How do economic teacher fail math so bad :P

26887
General Discussion / Re: Copyright General (Calm discussion only please)
« on: January 23, 2012, 12:06:39 pm »
Other way around, Glyph. Saying that 'protect the children' needs to be something the parents do, not the government. At least with opt-in stuff like the internet, anyway. It is absolutely a parental failure when children get access to illicit/explicit material or are exploited by individuals online.

26888
General Discussion / Re: Copyright General (Calm discussion only please)
« on: January 23, 2012, 11:28:52 am »
One of those other bits I picked up elsewhere: This, the "Protecting Children From Internet Pornographers Act of 2011." Here's the "fun" part, from what I can see:
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Illusion of privacy? Shit, you don't even get that anymore. Excellent example of trying to slip something frakking horrible through the cracks? Yup!

An aside, but total honesty: Whoever allowed something -- anything -- to be titled like that needs to be flogged, fired, and then kept at least 100 yards from, and completely incommunicado with, any decision making process for the rest of their lives.

26889
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: January 23, 2012, 11:01:50 am »
Sleep apnea, maybe? Or something related. I'd suggest talking to a doctor or setting up an appointment with a sleep clinic, if you can afford it. I've had some relatives lose people to that, hrm.

26890
General Discussion / Re: Copyright General (Calm discussion only please)
« on: January 23, 2012, 04:29:43 am »
Which is kind of a "Yaaaay... shit. What now?" thing. I'm not exactly willing to start killing people over this shit at this point, but it seems like that's the ultimate end point. Those in power aren't willing to compromise or adapt and are willing to resort to using the physical enforcement organizations (police, military) already in place to force through their wishes, while the other side is either unable or unwilling to go to those lengths. Those in power don't give a shit who dies (so long as it's not them) or suffers (so long as it's not them), so how the hell can the more moral individual (who refuses to cross those lines) do anything about it? There's currently more than enough industry and physical power centralized to completely destroy any attempts by decentralization advocates to advance their position and we're seeing them do exactly that.

So what hell do, yanno'?

26891
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you sad today thread.
« on: January 23, 2012, 01:02:33 am »
... you're actually claiming that 12kb/s is slower than a 28.8k modem? Youngins :-\

That's better than 2-3x faster than a 56k, which is about twice as fast as a 28.8k. Not even remotely in the same ballpark, heh.

26892
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you sad today thread.
« on: January 23, 2012, 12:40:00 am »
Hey, anyone know where I can find the source of all pain and punch it in the mouth? I could really go for that right now.
You have no idea how much I hope (though very much don't believe) that there is both an afterlife and anthropomorphic incarnations of stuff like that.

I have every intention of spending the first bit of eternity after death getting to the point I can kick the shit out of those bastids and then the rest of said eternity doing just that. There are days when that whimsy of sweet vengeance is all that keeps me going. Sometimes spite really is a sufficient motivator. "Up yours too, reality. I'm still alive and moving. You'll get yours, you bastids."

First step, render their plans void for as long as possible (Survive, because the universe hates you, so it's only fair you hate it back.). Second step, eternal bloody vengeance. It's a nice fantasy :)

26893
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you sad today thread.
« on: January 23, 2012, 12:26:49 am »
Haha, yeah. Doc looked at my lower back when I was 18, "ohey, you've got the spine of 40 year old." That was not a fun day, though the sensation of something stabbing my lower back for the week or so beforehand was considerably less fun :P

26894
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you sad today thread.
« on: January 23, 2012, 12:23:56 am »
Still... I have never really felt comfortable being dependant on something to get by.
I pretty much developed a full on phobia of medical drugs for fear of developing a dependency, and now being told that I will need glasses seems sort of scary. I'm very much a 'carry your house on your back' kind of guy, and that becomes more and more difficult the more things become indisposable.
Well, you don't need them in a technical sense. You can go functionally blind just fine, it'll just mean becoming pretty much non-functional in a lot of ways. 40's a good age to shoot for you're looking to go without all those delightful dependency-related advances the human race has made in the last few hundred years, really.

I've got that near-phobia of drugs, too, but glasses don't elicit nearly the same response from me. I can take glasses off really easily, after all. Be basically useless, yes, but there's not a direct physiological dependency of any sort. They're just a tool, like a magnifying glass.

Started wearing them I think around 17-18 years ago, though, which probably has something to do with it. Also helps that not wearing them and attempting to function (read: Read or identify any details beyond that foot or so) is accompanied by crippling headaches. Having to choose between a painkiller dependency or glasses is a really easy choice :P

God dammit, I have the eyesight of an old man...
Better than the spine or the nervous system of one ;)

And not really. Plenty of old men can see just fine, same as plenty of young ones have trouble seeing. I've had functional vision problems since I was in the single digit year range and I know people in their 80s that don't have a single issue. It's just a thing, yanno'?

26895
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you sad today thread.
« on: January 23, 2012, 12:00:16 am »
Glasses are pretty impressive nowadays. M'mother's legally blind without contacts, has been for years, and has been getting worse as time passes. Still able to function fine so long as she's got those or glasses on. I personally can't see more than a blur from about a foot out, still perfectly capable with th'glasses on.

Basically takes more than near/far sightedness getting worse to cause you to go full on blind, at least if you're using the proper corrective tools. There's stuff that can cause outright blindness, but if you're getting regular (annual/bi-annual) eye exams, most of those can be caught before they go critical and prevented.

Pages: 1 ... 1791 1792 [1793] 1794 1795 ... 1929