Bay 12 Games Forum

Incursion's got it. It's not really mass-spam sort of necromancer, but they're solid so far as dead critter minion goes.

Least from what I've seen, there's a gap between too big to use well and too big to fail particularly easily. A thirty/forty card deck can get rolled over pretty easily, a fifty+ card deck lolorolls the game. It's fairly interesting, really. Suggests the balance tuning is pretty on point for normal gameplay.

I'm a churchgoing Christian (aka the sex police) and I could absolutely not care less about whatever stupid sexual BS the President is into.

Also, my liberal friends talk way, way, way more about sex and how wrong people are for not adopting their views on it than anyone in my church. More so than my church in general, even.

So serial philandering and violation of marriage vows means sod all to you as a christian, and that sort of thing has no bearing on your view of their fitness as a president, gotcha'.

Have to say that's refreshing, in a sense. Most sort I've met over the years at least draw up a veneer of sanctimonious babble on the subject. If only the rest of christian religious folks would apply that sort of view, maybe we could unwind the several centuries of raw bullshit the religion in general has injected into societal norms regarding sex and relationships, get them out of marriage laws and sex ed, decriminalize prostitution, maybe cut out those exceptions for underage marriages still screwing around mostly because of 'em, who knows what else. Plenty to choose from, really.

There's probably commentary to be made on how much easier to is to be quiet on a subject when you're in the advantageous position and rely quite a bit on ignorance and pointed silence to stay that way, but eh. I'm sure all discussion (or lack thereof) on sex is equally valuable and no positions on it are actually wrong.

Health is health, and the military pays for plenty more than combat injury or random illness. Iirc the farce comparison re: cost bullshit is that the corps spend more on sodding viagra alone than they have on trans treatment overall. Never mind the cost argument is coming primarily from fucking republicans that regularly dump spending on the military they don't even friggin' want, or all the other crap that pisses all over the attempt to excuse this shit as fiscal concern.

nobody has brought up punitive damages, because you're right about that. but nobody cares about assessing punitive damages. actual damages would be fine here. maybe attorneys' fees if we're being extravagant.

What kind of nutjobbery is involving an attorney in a sub-hundred dollar refund claim? Your actual damages, assuming the court ruled in your favor to begin with (note I'd probably be pretty damn hesitant assuming that stateside, if you're trying it over here -- there's not much protection for getting burned by something like KS if you're of sound mind, last I paid attention), would be whatever you backed at most. For most people that's small claims court junk, and bringing a lawyer into that is how you lose an order of magnitude more money than you were suing for.

I guess you could try for some kind of class action thing? I'unno, bringing something like this before a judge in general, particularly just for the cost of the "damages" a backer incurred, sounds more pants on head than still wanting to give more money to the project at this point in time.

... actually, quick glance at legal action involving the amounts that would be in question here suggests that anything that's not class action or punitive would be basically bloody stupid. Weeks to months of court effort for a refund probably lower than the cost to file the claim, that you might not even get at the end of it all. You'd need a good pile of spite and a lot of time on your hands to go through with it. Hell, if you actually are trying to stiff the dev with the attorney fees I doubt you could even call it justice or some shite given how much more money that'd pretty certainly involve than the amount generally backed.

Dunno if I even have much of a point here, other than to note this talk of legal repercussions sounds like lunacy when for most folks they're out like, what, 30 bucks or some junk? Maybe a BBB or consumer protection complaint or somethin'. Simple money voting, for what good it'd do at this point. There's not much room for a courtroom to get involved with this situation without someone having gone kinda' loco.

We just recieved an order or jack daniels liquor fudge caramels. I didnt even know they made these.

... which is a mild wtf to me, because I'm pretty sure I did know folks made those things, and I avoid recreational alcohol like the plague it's been on my family tree.

It's probably a hold-over from Dom 4, which obviously didn't have a strength bonus on its ranged weapons. So not so much of a bug as an oversight?

Eh? Some of them definitely had some strength interactions. Might have just been range, but I could swear there was some (grotesquely gem inefficient) hilarity with high strength >2 arm critters and fire bolas or somethin' like that. Maybe I'm remembering D3?

Though the standard bows definitely didn't, so holdover could still be accurate.

I have today noticed the existence of stunky, the pokemon with an ass for a face.

Cannot say day was improved