Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Frumple

Pages: 1 ... 422 423 [424] 425 426 ... 1929
6346
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol: Back to work Congress!
« on: January 04, 2018, 12:31:36 pm »
This is one of those things where no matter what happens, you're gonna see that the government does not actually have absolute power. There is no fucking way you can rebag this cat with over 60% public approval, sympathies even higher than that, and long established norms over most of the country.
It being blatantly racist bullshit doesn't exactly help when we're creeping towards a minority-majority population, either, heh.

6347
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: January 04, 2018, 12:12:28 pm »
Everybody's metabolism and internal chemistry is slightly different (which is why personalized medicine is slowly becoming a thing), so, whatever works for you I guess.

At least it's helping you. :)

edit: Practicing calming excersizes like meditation or yoga or whatever you choose may help too because it's all about the state of mind.
Uh. Not all about state of mind. Meditation and whatnot definitely can help even (especially, to an extent) with the more physiological parts, though. It's just entirely possible that it's far from sufficient even if you're very solid in regards to practicing the stuff. Sometimes yo' brain just be fucked up and there ain't much you can do (without outside assistance, so to speak) so far as tricking your body into unfucking itself goes.

... not that trying isn't still pretty helpful, most of the time. It's just probably a good thing to not downplay what aspects seriously can't be controlled, that there are in fact situations where you can't do jack (save cope/suffer, which friggin' blows) about what your body is trying to force your state of mind to be. Even odds I'd be in notably better shape if someone had jammed that down my throat a decade or two ago before I managed it on my own, personally.

tl;dr, the specific wording "all about the state of mind" is something I kinda' hate in reference to anything anti-anxiety or whatev' meds should be involved with.

Ruddy thing comes with that hanging accusation that folks that don't have it are failing primarily because of what they do rather than how their brain is screwing them over.

It is/can be both, but stuff like that and society in general really sodding loves downplaying the latter, which causes a lot more misery for a lot more people than necessary. It ain't all about the state of mind, however pithy the saying is *grumbles*

6348
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: January 04, 2018, 11:09:22 am »
Usually on the rare occasion when they buy simulated poo it's to torment another kid with it, not whatever this is

Constript reporting
mildly disappointing this wasn't some kind of appropriately themed medical term instead of conscript being misspelled

6349
Ssoooo... anyone else looking forward to not being able to afford replacing their cpu with something lacking the apparently ubiquitous security flaw in more or less every chip made in like the last decade? I know I'm not :V

6350
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol: Back to work Congress!
« on: January 04, 2018, 01:05:12 am »
Eh... not so much CEOs or whatev' explicitly laughing (though one could totally talk about that and what leads them to spew out HR management/business communication 101 junk), as industry trends causing reality to laugh at the concept. You don't have to squint much to see stuff like per worker production rising while wages functionally stay static as suspiciously similar to a con job (I.e. give me more money and what you're going to get back isn't going to change, also we're going to spend this on hookers and blow and you're not even invited to watch just throwing that out there), which is, y'know. Not the sort of economic interaction we tend to speak of in particularly shining terms :P

Not healthy or good business or whatever, basically. More stuff that ends up causing people to maybe not question too hard about how the critter running the con ended up in a shallow grave, some time after they left your grandma too poor to fix their roof and led to her dying of pneumonia. The societal equivalent thereof tending to involve guillotines or somethin' which we prolly wanna' avoid and not just because even the lead up to it sucks giant donkey scrotum.

Definitely not a particularly one to one analogy, though. Just something that struck me as fairly structurally similar to the problems with money what ain't moving (much).

6351
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: January 03, 2018, 11:55:08 pm »
Lucky you. We're not going to hit 10 until Sunday. As a high. Sunday it's supposed to be a balmy 32.
Oi, luck would be getting that for a bit. Sorta', since it'd probably kill people down here. The reactions of floridians to that sort of thing would be amazing, though.

... also I kinda' like the cold. Twenty below freezing would give me an excuse to wear layers for the first time in decades, plural.

6352
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol: Back to work Congress!
« on: January 03, 2018, 11:51:15 pm »
Cheers for that, assuming things end up sticking.
Ah, ok, you are using 'stagnant' in terms of velocity of money.  Then yes, I agree that in the US at least the velocity of money is indeed pretty low these days.

I don't think that's the whole picture though - you don't have to have a high money velocity to have a healthy economy. You just need a "high enough" one.
Oh, sure. High enough is more or less baseline, with higher mostly being icing. As functionally static wages (vis a vis purchasing power) for massive swaths of the US labor market, among all sorts of things, suggest, though, we probably don't have high enough so far as... most everyone, really. At the least lots of people. Are concerned, heh.

Economy generally isn't reasonably or often called healthy when bunches of it aren't metaphorically feeling better as time goes on, from what I've noticed. Healthier than it could be, most definitely, but there's a reason "better" isn't particularly equivalent to "good". The best king of the most wonderful shit mountain is still enthroned in a mountain of shit, et al. Though that's at least a bit hyperbolic relative to the state of things stateside... mostly. There's places 'bout as fucked up as anywhere on earth.

Quote
So simply stated, it's not how much money is spent, but on what types of things money is spent, that matters?  I mean, really, what does "Money spent by a poor bastard goes all over the place, up and down and sideways" mean compared to "Chunk of the money rich bastards spend doesn't get around much"?  Is it because the rich are just spending piles of money in big loops with each other, essentially merely extracting rent from the "lower classes" instead of producing new goods and services
Yeah, you pretty much got it.

Sorta' reminds me of that old naivety that workers would be paid more as they became more productive. Industry has been laughing long and hard on that subject for a good while now. When folks pay more in or put more out and get little to nothing from it, we tend to start pulling out pretty negative descriptors, ha.

6353
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol: Back to work Congress!
« on: January 03, 2018, 08:41:52 pm »
Lot of those investments don't really do anything, though. They're sitting there appreciating but they're not, say, producing a service or dongle of much note, actually housing anyone (or if it is, massively inefficiently so far as people with shelter goes), paying workers (more), and so on. Hell, sometimes they're being leveraged to actively prevent that sort of things. Fundamentally barely any of the money is doing much outside a pretty limited slice of the population, if even that much.

It's stagnant in the sense the amount of hands it's passing through (which is a major part of most active economies) are few, and often hella' limited vertically in regards to what part of the population(s) in question it touches to boot (see: recent industry comments about intending to pass absolutely nothing they get out of the tax scam on to their workers). When part of the money pool isn't swirling around, you get stagnant money. It's maybe not 100% stagnant in every way, shape, or form, but it's pretty still and the effects barely touch the parts of the economy people need to, like. Live and be happy in large numbers and such. Broadening the analogy out to resources as a general thing takes more effort than I got in me at the mo', but it's not that hard to do, I don't believe.

Basically the whole "trickle down doesn't" dealio, really. Money spent by a poor bastard goes all over the place, up and down and sideways (so long as someone doesn't stick it in a pillowcase or offshore bank account or shell company or whatevs, anyway). Chunk of the money rich bastards spend doesn't get around much, which means it's not benefiting many people, either. Money making money more or less does kinda' sod all for most folks, heh. Which generally tends to be pretty undesirable (or eventually unfortunate for many someones).

6354
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: January 03, 2018, 07:29:57 pm »
The only thing falling in a well is autocorrupt once I finish kicking it down one.

6355
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: January 03, 2018, 07:26:20 pm »
That advice applies for women with male bosses, or whatever other combination you care to form, as much or more. It's pretty gender neutral advice outside the pronouns, heh.

Why do you need to widen your mattress?
I mean, I don't need to. I just have a substantial amount of bedding I don't really use over the warmer months, massively prefer to sleep with my bed up against a wall, and broadly speaking don't care enough to do much with the stuff besides use it as a foot prop or pillow, so excess bedding has been gradually wedging itself between the mattress and the wall, slowly pushing the mattress off the edge of the bed frame. Ergo, after a bit I've ended up with something somewhat larger than the twin the bed is built as, the wall-side corner made mostly of compacted blankets.

That said, I do tend to sleep with my laptop on the part of the bed I'm not on, so it's kinda' helpful for providing more arm space (and decreasing the likelihood of the laptop getting knocked off).

6356
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: January 03, 2018, 07:10:41 pm »
It might snow tonight.
Oh, neat. That led me to check the forecast. Lows in the sub-30s F over the next few days. Hadn't really noticed, heh. Might actually have vague need to dig out one of the blankets I've been using to functionally widen my mattress~

6357
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: January 03, 2018, 04:59:41 pm »
Uh. Maybe? Sometimes that can be a terrible sign...

6358
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: January 03, 2018, 04:37:12 pm »
Fire solves all things. Except not being on fire, I guess. It can totally solve the issue of people complaining about things being on fire, though, so it probably evens out somewhere in there.

Also, just noticed Super Mario Odyssey is a thing that exists. Watching gameplay, I can't help but summarize the thing as "How Mario Stole Spike McFang's Hat Trick." That ghost makes it extra suspicious. I see that top hat jack, and mr tomato vampire wants 'is hat back.

6359
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol: Back to work Congress!
« on: January 03, 2018, 10:12:21 am »
Can't recall food explicitly, but I'd swear other stuff (toilet paper?) has been. Hell, unless they changed it near the end, the tax scam pretty explicitly killed a deduction aimed at teachers that spent personal money on things for their students, things that were more often than not consumables of one sort or another.

Like said, food isn't usually involved due to not being taxed at all (the "deduction" is basically wrote in ahead of time by exempting the stuff from sales taxes), but other stuff definitely is.

6360
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol: Back to work Congress!
« on: January 03, 2018, 09:08:04 am »
Hol' up. #6. Using food and general consumables are totally counted as a credit/expenditure, same as depreciation (i.e. loss). The bookkeeping is actually more or less identical, with some fairly mild differences in accounts referenced and some fiddly bits related to depreciation due to some of the junk regarding how it's calculated. But fundamentally they're both counted as losses (one versus the consumable supply or general fund if that's not explicitly involved, which is an asset, one versus the building/vehicle/machine/etc., which is also an asset), and more or less the same sort of losses to boot. Quite literally accounting 101, heh. Or 102. Somewhere in there.

Depreciation can have net loss involved much more easily due to shifting market prices and whatnot than general consumables, but that's largely just because the latter is fairly rarely kept around long enough to be particularly effected by the related concerns.

Could swear there are (or at least was) some tax deductions involved with a few sorts of general consumables, too, for that matter. Food generally isn't because it generally isn't taxed to begin with in the US, but most depreciable assets totally are.

Pages: 1 ... 422 423 [424] 425 426 ... 1929