6378
« on: December 25, 2017, 04:10:04 pm »
Fairly sure the amount the patients pay doesn't really have much to do with the supply of doctors, save maybe for the incentives it gives to hospitals to hire the fewest doctors/nurses and maintain the fewest beds they can get away with in order to maximize profits,* or the extent it reduces demand and subsequently puts less pressure on hospitals to move towards a larger staff. Gods know I've forgotten the details, though.
Or to put it another way, the costs in the US, particularly for the patients, has roughly fuck all to do with how many beds or doctors a hospital has. Near as I can remember, the major bottlenecks (to the extent there actually is one, considering the various resources the US has to throw around if it gives enough of a shit to do it) is more education costs, profit minded hospitals being skinflint, and defunding efforts near entirely led with GOP politicians at the head.
Basically, least if my memory's not horribly failing me, patient costs are effectively orthogonal to most of the logistics issues involved with running hospitals so far as the US's fucked up healthcare system goes. Aiming to reduce demand side problems isn't likely to do terribly much save make things less hella' shite for lots of people on the demand side of things.
E: Well, and maybe fuck over the health insurance industry a bit. Which, uh. I'm not sure you're going to find many people not part of it shedding much in the way of tears about the health insurance industry getting a portion of the shaft they've been inflicting on everyone for the last long while.
* You'd think they'd be encouraged to get the most beds they can, but the fucked up pricing, among other things, means there's no few number of incentives to limit them in order to reduce the number of people that can't pay in part or at all. US healthcare is a case study in perverse incentives, heh.