Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Frumple

Pages: 1 ... 42 43 [44] 45 46 ... 1929
646
Except purple, or so I've been told. It's apparently actually what happens when your brain errors out and can't parse what it's seeing, so it's less a color and more "404 Color Not Found".

Purple is my favor not!color. Also my favorite color, purple haters can get stuffed :V

647
That sound when a cat with zoomies and a slippy-ish floor interact, where a pattapattapatta noise goes through the house followed by a distinct *thump*.

648
General Discussion / Re: I deleted twitter and you should too
« on: July 04, 2023, 06:44:10 am »
I am planning to jump the ship as soon as Blue Sky will go into a public beta. After all, there are basic dignity.
From a couple days ago, but from what I've been seeing I'd probably suggest really strongly to not. Bluesky's run by the same kind of nut techbro libertarian as musk (Dorsey, who's on their board and heavily involved in decision making and design literally helped found twitter, and has gone pretty full freeze peach crazy over the years), and is currently having some pretty incredibly concerning things going on regarding how it handles stuff like child pornography.

There's no dignity in that particular platform, to all appearances. Unless there's some serious changes there's no indication the current owners are interested in making, it's going to release in the state of "8chan-tier cesspool" :-\

649
Yeh, there's several drafting-style games like luck be a landlord these days... I've seen a RPG-styled one and a farming one just off the top of my head, and I'm pretty sure I'm forgetting a couple others.

The nice thing about them being games instead of intentionally unwinnable-in-aggregate money-extractors is, yes, they actually let you win, ha.

... though really, while the general presentation is like a slot machine, the actual mechanics are... fairly divorced from how a slot machine works, on any level beyond aesthetics. They're more like a draft based card game or somethin'.

650
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: July 03, 2023, 05:17:13 pm »
For what staggeringly little it's worth, the change doesn't just target businesses, but artificial entities in general. It includes nonprofits (including, probably tellingly, churches) as well as more traditional businesses, and wouldn't grant anyone local extra votes; it's there to allow non-resident, non-property owners the ability to vote in the relevant elections.

... there is, admittedly, a certain je ne sais quoi in GOP politicians pushing an election change to literally let people bring in non-residents and foreigners to influence an election, though.

That said, shit's mostly kayfabe -- seaford is a town with all of 8k population, 5k capable of voting, that sees elections with less than 1k votes fairly often. It's not exactly some kind of major population center, and it's not precedent either; there's other (also tiny, from what I could tell) municipalities in delware with similar provisions. It's dumb and shouldn't be allowed to pass and the city in question are idiots for trying to begin with, but as stakes go, they're small.

651
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: July 03, 2023, 02:09:18 pm »
As near as I can tell from a quick check, it's a delaware "city" (seaford, voting population ~5k), though the change has to be okay'd through legislature (it's passed the house after failing repeatedly, but won't be seen by the senate until next year). There's apparently a single digit number of other municipalities in the state that have already passed something similar. It mostly seems to be giving municipalities the legal grounds to do something that dumb, basically, rather than mandating it for the state.

To all appearances it's less "delaware wants to let businesses vote" and more "they're not super interested in caring about some piss-tiny town screwing themselves over".

E: Which, in fairness, is still not exactly a good thing, but it's a different sort and scale of shite, y'know?

E2: Though, with a bit more looking, it's more something GOP fucks are using to screw with people (because of course it is) as part of whatever mess is going on with a budget bill, than it is anything. Someone local or that actually cares more about delaware probably has a better grasp of details, but my fuckometer has hit zero so anyone interested'll have to do the research themselves :V

652
... one of these days I am going to look up laws on vehicle painting, though. I'd love to turn my ride into a purple zen tangle, but I'm not 100% sure it'd be legal, just due to how distracting that sort of patterning can be.
I'd like to introduce you to the concept of vinyl wrapping your car.
That's... neat. Entirely too regular for what I'd want, but it does suggest there's not a major problem with the general idea.

E: Replacement hard drive arrived and installed, seems to even be working (substantially better than the old one even disregarding the whole "getting prompts to repair it due to corruption twice a day" thing). Now to... do stuff to it.

E2: Now if only I could get the computer to stop setting my entire friggin d drive to read only I could actually use it aaaaahhh

653
General Discussion / Re: I deleted twitter and you should too
« on: July 02, 2023, 03:28:12 pm »
There are always people online affected, I haven't encountered any issues, have you?
Embeds ("cannot connect") and the entire site ("something has gone wrong!") was utterly broken for me all of yesterday, and I haven't bothered to even try today, so yes, there's been issues for me specifically ::)

654
General Discussion / Re: I deleted twitter and you should too
« on: July 02, 2023, 07:23:51 am »
Let me rephrase, this isn't affecting me, and I suspect it does/would not affect most people.
That'd be really unusual, because it's been hitting a ton of people really hard since it started. The specific implementation is so shit folks are hitting the rate limit sometimes in minutes, just in the process of normal usage. If you're actually able to browse for any particular length of time, you're either going extremely slowly or somehow managing to stick to tweets that have almost no replies to them.

655
General Discussion / Re: I deleted twitter and you should too
« on: July 01, 2023, 08:09:19 pm »
I mean, it might not be dead quite yet, depending on how quickly and how thoroughly the rate limit nonsense gets pulled back. But if the current state of things lasts more than a day, maybe two? If the rate limit shite sticks around? Stick a fork in it, it's done. Some shadow of twitter may hang around, but it'll hemorrhage users like blood out a stuck pig.

The way things are right now is just outright nonfunctional for the vast majority of the users, they ain't gon' stick around.

656
General Discussion / Re: I deleted twitter and you should too
« on: July 01, 2023, 07:22:13 pm »
For bonus points, folks have figured out that "read" means "load in any way, shape, or form", and includes things like replies to a post that loads. People are hitting the rate limit from nothing, sometimes on loading literally one post (due to it having a lot of replies). It's wildly broken.

It's worth noting, google was due to cancel cloud services because of non-payment, well. Yesterday/today. There's reporting some sort of deal was made to continue functionality on that front, but this whole mess looks a lot like their hosting services (quite possibly involving more companies than just google) decided they were tired of musk's shit and stopped providing, with twitter's reaction being to drastically cut traffic in a very short period to keep their in-house stuff from buckling entirely.

... though do note, the uptick in scraping is largely self-inflicted due to twitter playing fuck-fuck games with API access and such. The issue* was manageable before the management in question decided to intentionally screw the pooch.

* To the extent it actually was one, mind; it's a big claim to say one of the biggest social media websites in the world was being meaningfully impacted in regards to server capability by what scraping efforts existed, and one of the only sources making that claim is, well. Twitter. Currently lead by a prolific liar, one known for doing things like not paying their bills and firing a great deal of what staff might have been able to navigate the problem, heh. It's more likely server capability's been kneecapped by poor admin decisions than anything related to scraping.

657
preservatives either which is great)
It's got where, whenever I see this, I end up having to ask: Was it really salt free? Because if so, I'm interested, heh.

... but most of the time when I see that line, the product is actually full of go-die levels of sodium, one of the o.g. preservatives. Which is perpetually disappointing, 'cause it'd be a lot easier to source stuff if it wasn't for that asterisk they keep forgetting to put after "preservatives" indicating they mean everything except salt :P

658
Brutalism for the win. Gorrillion folded reinforced concrete slabs arranged in domicile-adjacent shapes make mother nature cry and Fuhrer proud.
That said, I like looking at these, with a 'fuck that's ugly' general vibe going through my head. I wouldn't want to live in one.

I actually like brutalism in the root of the style: exposed materials likee concrete, steel and brick. The shapes that we think of are also alright with me, honestly. I'd be fine to live in a half-finished building apparently.
I mean, it's finished when the insides aren't exposed to the elements anymore and the desired utilities function. Everything past that point is just extras :V

659
Other Games / Re: Free Game List
« on: June 30, 2023, 02:13:00 pm »
It's ended up in either or both in the past. Doesn't hurt to crosspost, really.

660
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: June 30, 2023, 10:18:09 am »
Last opinions for this SCOTUS term. Two 6-3 along party lines, one unanimous.

303 Creative LLC v. Aubrey Elenis: The First Amendment prohibits Colorado from forcing a website designer to create expressive designs speaking messages with which the designer disagrees.

(6-3. Correct, IMO)
One of the "fun" things with this one is that apparently a great deal of the case was based on shit that was just outright fabricated. Details on that one seem to be pretty fucked up, which makes it entirely unsurprising it was a 6-3 party line ruling.

That wasn't what the colorado law did, anyway; it was a specific prohibition against certain forms of discrimination, not just "messages with which the designer disagrees". The state had basically said you don't get to be a bigoted shit if you want to do business there, SCOTUS has said 'nah fam, be a shit, we got your back'.

Other 6-3's pretty crap too, for that matter. Really, you can just kind of assume anything 6-3 along party lines from this SCOTUS bench is a royally fucked up decision on some level. I can't think of any cases since the majority went that direction they weren't.

Pages: 1 ... 42 43 [44] 45 46 ... 1929