That last bit sounds suspiciously like what a lot of conservatives (and likely some liberals too) decried as Amnesty. Doesn't sound like a 'merit-based immigration system' either. Trump admin is pulling words out of it's ass most likely.
What, the nonimmigrant classification thing? If that's what people call amnesty I'm not sure anyone would
want it.
'Cause the bill bitsies look something like this:
an alien who is a parent of a citizen of the United States, if the citizen is at least 21 years of age.”.
A nonimmigrant described in section 101(a)(15)(W)—
“(A) is not authorized to be employed in the United States; and
“(B) is not eligible for any Federal, State, or local public benefit.
“(3) Regardless of the resources of a nonimmigrant described in section 101(a)(15)(W), the United States citizen son or daughter who sponsored the nonimmigrant parent shall be responsible for the nonimmigrant’s support while the nonimmigrant resides in the United States.
An alien is ineligible to receive a visa or to be admitted into the United States as a nonimmigrant described in section 101(a)(15)(W) unless the alien provides satisfactory proof that the United States citizen son or daughter has arranged for health insurance coverage for the alien, at no cost to the alien, during the anticipated period of the alien’s residence in the United States.”.
There's also a bidecadal check as to if yo' momma's ass gets kicked out the country, presumably on top of whatever else of similar nature is loitering around.
As far as I can tell checking sections of the INA that particular addition references, what it's trying to do is create a new class of non-immigrant that's even more shat on than most other classes of non-immigrant, for what appears to be so that the parent and their kid(s) have jack all recourse for help with medical costs. If there's anything advantageous in it compared to what already existed in the INA, I can't see it.