Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Frumple

Pages: 1 ... 482 483 [484] 485 486 ... 1929
7246
General Discussion / Re: Religious people, make yourselves known!
« on: July 21, 2017, 02:32:07 pm »
Do you *want* a thermonuclear flame war? Because that is how you get a thermonuclear flame war.
Eh, it's a weird thing. I wasn't trying to say theology is objectively that level of thing, just that that's about the level I personally enjoy it. Was trying to make sure it was fairly clear I was talkin' about my personal interaction or whatev', though looking at it now I can see how it would be interpreted otherwise. It's also a statement about specifically theology, in the academic sense.

I enjoy reading theological treatise at about the same level I enjoy going through a middle/high school art festival thing, just with less annoyance from being outside in florida weather, basically. I'm not saying they're at the same level of quality or objective value or actual skill involved or anything like that, just that my aesthetic appreciation of them is about on the same level. A solid but not amazing gallery of paintings is about as engaging to me as, say, the Summa Theologica. They're both pretty.

And hell, I come from a fairly artist heavy family. Don't mind going to those sorts of art presentations for entertainment purposes and junk. Middling skill when it comes to that kind of art isn't somethin' I'd really talk down at, usually, particularly if I'm actually talking legitimately middling -- middle of the road -- skill and not throwing shade at somethin'.

Understand how folks more invested in theology or religious stuff in general could take it otherwise, but the comparison seriously isn't intended as an insult or condescension or somethin'. Just tryin' to be open about the degree of engagement I get with the stuff, despite having little metaphysical or practical synch with religion.

7247
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread: The Russian shoe deepens
« on: July 21, 2017, 01:13:12 pm »
Yeah, it would, but the SCOTUS -- while not explicitly stating it -- have been pretty clear on related subjects that they would not be terribly amused to the POTUS attempting to pardon themselves, particularly from criminal convictions.

And yeah, the alternative to a federal crime is a state crime. So far as I'm aware NY at the absolute least has a nice slate of financial laws trump and co haven't seen jail time over largely just because no one cared enough to see them hit with it. It's been pretty consistent speculation that whatever else mueller might turn up, now that the investigation is doing stuff like looking into business connections there's going to be a whole mess of that sort of shit start tumbling out. Basically, there's no guarantee a presidential pardon would be keeping anyone from ending up in front of a judge.

Though clinton pardoned or not, the bit that explicitly reached SCOTUS was settled on before anything else. Only reason it didn't go further is because of that, heh. It's very much true the constitution doesn't explicitly forbid it, but that's basically the whole and entire legal defense for it and there's a good chunk of other stuff in rather pointed disagreement.

E: Or to put it another way, from what I've seen so far it looks a lot like the legal area it's in is a lot less grey than some folks like to present it as, for whatever reason (*coughviewscough*). It is, but by and large it only is because no one's actually been stupid enough to play legal chicken with the SCOTUS on the subject, yet.

E2: Though, at the end of the day, what makes it personally seem hilariously unlikely that the judiciary would go along with a self-pardon is that it would effectively be ceding any and all judicial oversight of the POTUS, and to a large degree by extension the executive branch as a whole.

Like, to say they would is effectively trying to say they would willingly take a gigantic dump not just on the separation of powers, but explicitly on their own ability to influence the other branches of government, utterly undermining a sizable chunk of both their authority and mandate. Is there any level it actually makes sense they would do that if there's absolutely any room to avoid it, which there very much is?

7248
Huh. I will probably never play that, but, well... free est. Might as well.

7249
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread: The Russian shoe deepens
« on: July 21, 2017, 12:49:31 pm »
You'd be wrong, heh. Presidential pardons are specifically limited to federal crimes (and just about everyone under potential fire for stuff related to that dirt is very much in the cross hairs of a lot more than federal level crimes), and an attempt at self-pardon has both never happened and is pretty sketchy from a legal perspective.

There's also some pretty substantial issues to being pardoned that makes it kinda' chancy, honestly. It's generally considered an admission of guilt, ehehe.

7250
General Discussion / Re: Religious people, make yourselves known!
« on: July 21, 2017, 12:33:18 pm »
As in, I don't really do "magic" anymore and I'm really just sitting still and breathing deeply, which is not fully proven to solve all your problems but it sure as hell feels like it does.
Not all problems, but it's definitely been found to have a handful of medical and psychological benefits.

... and I guess if I'm going to decorate the corpse, I'd repeat that I'm probably closest to an irreligious apatheist, that also happens to have an aesthetic appreciation for theology. Don't particularly like organized religion in general and I don't think the question of the divine actually matters, but I find that the concept structures theologians create to try to explain and/or systematize religious belief can be pretty, for lack of a particularly better word.

Not necessarily beautiful or somethin' -- it's idle amusement at best, really -- but at least on par with amateur art of middling skill, which is nice enough. Even if I don't agree with conclusions or presumptions involved it's still neat to see how folks put 'em together to end up with religious precepts.

7251
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread: The Russian shoe deepens
« on: July 21, 2017, 11:17:42 am »
For what hilariously little it's worth, it's possible that advice wasn't as farcically terrible as it looks on the face of things. Moving to an area better able to support care is one of the things that can be involved with attempted treatment of that sort of thing. I don't really doubt it was given in the spirit that tweet presents, but hey.

In other news, spicer's apparently said, "Screw this, I'm done." Not that bluntly, unfortunately, but reports are saying he's resigned over the appointment of whoever the newest WH communications director-thing is. And damnit all, ninja'd by misk. Bah!

7252
Other Games / Re: Sky Wanderers: The Game That Was Prophecized
« on: July 20, 2017, 09:48:18 am »
... all I can say is that the title is, apparently, one word. Not two. Searching for sky wanderers on youtube will mostly get you a bunch of stuff not even tangentially related. Get rid of the space and material for the game will start showing up more readily.

7253
Dunno about horrible, but they've certainly never really had the smallest bit of interest to me, at the least. Stuff I look at and go, "Why would I play this instead of watching/reading a LP, not have to deal with the fiddly annoying bits, and still get effectively everything of value from the product?"

I've never had much luck getting into a normal-ish adventure game, though. One of those things where I'd rather just read a book or somethin' -- plot gets in the way of the gameplay, gameplay gets in the way of the plot, and generally the mechanics et al involved are either vaguely unpleasant and/or boring or just functionally nonexistent.

Can see why some folks like 'em, but the things by and large seriously aren't for me. Exceptions have mostly been VNs rather than more western styled stuff along those lines, that have a serious gameplay component alongside the plot-y bits. Only rough bit there is a number of the ones with good-ish gameplay are, well... without a better way of putting it, they're also porn. Which obvs doesn't bother me (save that it tends to detract from the plot and such to some degree), but there's other components involved, heh.

7254
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread: The Russian shoe deepens
« on: July 18, 2017, 02:53:33 pm »
It will be blamed on Democrats either way, and their base will buy it.
Yes, and Democrats were able to blame the 2008 recession on Bush.

You forget the most simple of things. People blame the President's party. Pure and simple. If it happens while X is in office, X's party will be blamed, even if it was set in motion prior.
The most succinct assessment of it I've noticed is mostly that the swing voters -- i.e. basically the only people who goddamn matter in an election, in practice -- associate stuff that happens during a president's term with the president's party. If shit is going poorly for them, shit very likely to go poorly for the incumbent, regardless of who's actually to blame.

... which basically means whether the GOP base buys it or not means sod all. The base isn't going to be what wins things for 'em. It's necessary, but not sufficient -- and they've be signalling real damn hard the GOP leadership could literally shit on them and they'd still vote R.

7255
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread: The Russian shoe deepens
« on: July 17, 2017, 08:10:40 pm »
Fun little note about caterpillar, actually. Them and their 'nam branch are apparently one of the larger beneficiaries of the vietnam trade deal crowed about earlier this year. Not only are they outsourcing, the president straight up put his name behind getting them business in another country :V

7256
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread: The Russian shoe deepens
« on: July 17, 2017, 07:48:13 pm »
Was thinking processed stuff instead of just that, but yeah, that's an even better one. Bloody hell how unaware can you get? Death Valley ice cream vendors?

7257
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread: The Russian shoe deepens
« on: July 17, 2017, 07:44:24 pm »
Quote
State       Company         Product
Georgia     Chick Fil A     Food

lol

Heh, yeah, it kind of looks like they almost couldn't find anything for Georgia. I still think it would have made for a better and more varied argument if they went for two, maybe three, or even four, companies per state, get some local stuff on there.
I mean, yeah, having half my immediate bloodline coming from savanna fucking chick fil a being what they pick is mildly infuriating. I know the waters have been dying in that state but goddamnit some bloody fast food restaurant chain is not something that should be representing that state. Or at least make it friggin' seafood or somethin', what the hell you jackasses have you never freaking been to any place in georgia not immediately adjacent to an interstate road or airport?

... I mean, I could understand them never having been somewhere like that in georgia, considering, but still. Still!

7258
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread: The Russian shoe deepens
« on: July 17, 2017, 09:16:49 am »
I think the most fun thing about that is that the SS hasn't actually said they weren't there, as near as I can tell. They said (unless the full body of the email statement that mess is referencing has been released and the context made things materially different from the bit that's being quoted) they wouldn't have been if Jr. hadn't been under their protection... not that no one in the meeting was under their protection and they were uninvolved and/or unaware of the meeting, heh.

It's probably just some kind of finicky gimmick to their procedures that means they can't say something or another that would be required for a direct, "No, we weren't sodding there, no one in that meeting was under our protection at the time", or someone hard failing an editing pass, but... still. It's fun stuff. Makes me want to know how intentional it was, ehehe.

7259
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: July 16, 2017, 08:31:29 pm »
... so inquiring minds want to know, what did you expect it to look like?

7260
... not jesting, actually. Phrased flippantly, perhaps, but it was otherwise sincere. I'd totes be down with a swath of genderbending remakes, eastern MMO shakespeare style. Metaphorical cornrows for everything! Also literal ones, occasionally.

Pages: 1 ... 482 483 [484] 485 486 ... 1929