Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Frumple

Pages: 1 ... 522 523 [524] 525 526 ... 1929
7846
... that sounds like something that would balloon either RAM or hard drive requirements. Possibly do horrible things to loading times. Please don't give them ideas. Devs don't need yet another excuse to throw efficiency out the window ;_;

E: In question news, anyone happen to know of a way to auto-append stuff to the end of web addresses from specific sites? General would be nice, firefox specific would be good enough. The specific scenario is I'd like to be able to stop manually typing &nohtml5=1 at the end of youtube addresses, since something or another they did quite few months back left that the only consistent way to keep that bloody godawful html5 shit from trying to boot up, and the various extensions that intend to force flash for the site are... not very good.

7847
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: April 04, 2017, 12:03:38 pm »
You could probably extend that to chlorine gas and then nukes.

I hope the thing that's better than nukes at killing people doesn't come soon.
I mean... if you're after specifically killing people I'm pretty sure there's a number of things that fit the bill, particularly from a cost/death ratio. Tailored disease of one sort or another's probably your best bet, something along those lines... they tend to not be considered largely due to the possibility of it turning blue on blue, but if you don't care about that, well. Also probably get better results from an intentionally dirty nuke than your normal one, too, or leveraging the possible EMP effect. Takes more time, but the body to nuke ratio'd likely be better from a mass murder standpoint. Maybe hitting somewhere that's an environmental lynchpin... be interesting to know if anyone's plotted the requirements to forcibly release atmosphere-influencing amounts of trapped methane or somethin'. Seem to remember some last ditch geoengineering plans to lower temperatures that might manage better than nukes would, too. Depends on what you call better, basically.

7848
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: April 04, 2017, 07:55:14 am »
As Neo said, the only resource on this planet that could really attract a spacefaring species is our biosphere. Anything of that sort would ruin it, so they couldn't do it.
Not necessarily! There's some parts of our biosphere (deep ocean, extreme temp stuff, so on) that could quite possibly survive a few (dozen) KKVs slamming into the planet -- and considering they're more or less the most exotic part of our biological portfolio, it could make sense that's what an extrasolar entity is looking for, with everything else on the planet being an obstacle. There's also some particularities to our biosphere that would basically require killing off most of the rest of it to create, ala methane utilizing bacteria en masse.

7849
Well, smj, backchannel stuff isn't necessarily uncommon. Diplomacy, intelligence work, military stuff, lots of things that can benefit from a bit of talk on the down low.

... what is uncommon, and in-goddamn-credibly suspicious, is a major government official going behind the government's back to try to form and utilize it. To paraphrase someone else, the president has a right to secrecy from their public, to an extent. What they don't have, is a right to secrecy from their government.

7850
So it turns out, to the surprise of no one, that trump's promises to divest himself of his businesses while in the position of POTUS were bald faced lies. The conflict of interest pile grows yet more as trump is shown to have pissed yet again on the traditions and dignity of the presidency, ha. Also seems like some of the businesses that are funneling into the trust are receiving payments from federal sources for various services. Apparently trump's corruption wasn't unsubtle enough for his lot, so he's working to make it more bloody obvious :V

7851
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: April 03, 2017, 02:18:38 pm »
... there definitely was a great deal of backstabbing, though, most of it very much emotional. A very significant amount of the reporting in the UK on brussels and the EU over the last long while have not exactly been penned or collected in the best of faith, to farcically understate things. Much of the UK body political was putting a fair chunk of effort into actively undermining the relationship. In your divorce metaphor the husband would have been rather emotionally abusive, heh. Not physically, but considering now that the divorce procedures are starting violence is being hinted at rather baldfacedly, well...

7852
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: April 03, 2017, 12:13:54 pm »
It... would have been incredibly easy to respond without, y'know, bringing up military action. Seriously, the question was if the guy was worried about gibraltar seeking independence in response to england's choices, and his response was a not at all oblique statement about having the resolve to go so far as to wage war on a spanish speaking nation. All of it in context of possible reactions from the UK towards the EU negotiations and the rest of the UK seeking independence because of them. There wasn't even the intimation there was any territory to defend, except possibly from england itself.

It would indeed have been ridiculous if the leave camp had actually done the sane thing and questioned what the hell he was going on about instead of setting their position firmly on top of the threat, but that ain't what happened. Which is why so much attention has come down on it.

7853
Eh, at least if the reports were accurate it probably wasn't. They specified the second explosive was makeshift, so (assuming the two are connected, anyway) either of them being a proper grenade is unlikely.

7854
It's most likely ISIS (or at least a lone wolf who pledged to ISIS), yeah, but it's too soon to have confirmed that, which is what I meant.
Though even if they claim it, that doesn't exactly mean they were actually behind it. More than one terrorist group that likes to do that, since being attributed with the act helps them regardless as to the veracity of the attribution. Without more information, the "who" could be just about anyone, for all something organized is more likely. It's not exactly unknown for someone random to blow something up, and organized terrorist/criminal groups and those they support don't have a monopoly on the ability to construct explosives.

Being able to build something at home with relatively normal access to civilian resources is definitely more difficult and less likely to produce results, but it's still a thing, and at least from what I've noticed from the bits of news that are in so far (which are admittedly slim on details) it wouldn't take much of a boom to do what's being reported. 9-10 dead and a couple dozen or so wounded in a close in/crowded area is within the territory of a well packed pipe bomb, which are dead easy to make so far as explosives go.

7855
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: April 03, 2017, 07:09:24 am »
Ach, blame not the trees for the vagaries of wood beetles. The many assholes of the bark were never desired! Poor trees never wanted to host douchecanoe ports, but the wood borer cares little and the results gapes despite the arboreal will.

...

except for chestnut trees

those guys are just complete prickly jackasses

7856
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: April 03, 2017, 06:52:59 am »
I can't sleep, again. And my whole face around my nose hurts for some fucking reason.
they warned you hatchetface wasn't literal, but you didn't listen

now you have fuel for winter and an aching face

7857
General Discussion / Re: The debate over pointless things thread
« on: April 03, 2017, 06:49:42 am »
... it depends on why sally said it was in basket two. If it was under the impression the marble was actually in basket one, probably a liar. If it was, say, forgetfulness, or misspeaking, or something of that nature, then probably not. Someone telling sally about it would count there, too, sure, though the method could be a lot of things. Maybe ann updated their facebook status to "putn marb n 2nd bask" or somethin'.

7858
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: April 02, 2017, 09:39:11 pm »
I'unno, last one I remember was about icefrog, iirc. Didn't really fit the description that was just given, either, and turned out the one pinning the name was just kinda' wrong, to boot, if my memory's working right.

That said... at least if all it was was calling them a liar, it definitely wouldn't be inciting harassment. Possibly slander or libel depending on the form (and only possibly, because there's more involved than just something like that), but not more. Inciting takes actually, y'know... inciting. Pretty direct calls or very blatant insinuation. Otherwise folks like Limbaugh would probably have gone to jail a few decades ago and never came out. Also looks like just the name wouldn't necessarily qualify as doxxing either, now that I double check. Stuff covers things that are personally identifiable, and last I recall most names just don't qualify for that. Too many other people with the same name, et al. Tacking on some sort of location or job position or something probably would trip things over the line.

Pretty sure confirming rumors wouldn't even count at all, tbh. The folks spreading the rumors themselves might be properly tagged as doxxing, though, and if the actual information that qualifies is being spread instead of just a sort of "yeah, so-and-so has the right of it" that might stick, too.

Mind, even if it's not actually doxxing or inciting harassment or whathaveyou, that doesn't mean whoever's doing it isn't being a complete dick. Just probably not doing anything that's actually illegal, or publishing information that could get them into legal trouble.

7859
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: April 02, 2017, 09:07:14 pm »
Those things, maybe not (though some of the GOP political machine...). Those also don't even remotely resemble the situation the UK is saber rattling over. Wossname wasn't saying that shit in reaction to the threat of a land invasion, 'cause the EU didn't even imply it obliquely, much less as directly as that critter did. He was saying military response is on the table if friggin' negotiations didn't go the UK's way. Most of cali would be about seven different kinds of pissed if the GOP tried to pull shit like that, especially over the reps doing something CA was overwhelmingly against.

Not even sure what a proper stateside equivalent would be. Would have to be something ruddy weird involving guam or somethin'.

7860
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: April 02, 2017, 07:21:41 pm »
... is it wrong to be vaguely amused by someone saying they care about the opinion of a group they're pissing on the opinion of? Why would gibraltar's opinion matter then when it didn't before and doesn't now?

Poor guys, though. First being dragged from the union they wanted to remain in, now being used as an excuse to threaten war and facing the likelihood of pretty severe economic repercussions regardless. Critters probably don't have a win condition for this one.

Pages: 1 ... 522 523 [524] 525 526 ... 1929