Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Frumple

Pages: 1 ... 526 527 [528] 529 530 ... 1929
7906
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: March 30, 2017, 01:03:51 pm »
What kind of car has only a single bolt securing the entire freaking engine? That seems retardedly dumb for a multitude of reasons, like, holy fuck, have they heard of this fun thing called redundancy and not putting the entire strain on a single rather small point :O
I couldn't tell you, cause this one has more than one bolt. It's just the rest of them had already been removed.

7907
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: March 30, 2017, 12:29:36 pm »
It's a thought. Probably should have checked the glove compartment. Might have even thought of it myself if it wasn't for the heat. Gets a lot harder to think when it starts cookin', and even if the breeze is decent and the clothes thin I start cooking pretty easily.

Somewhat irrelevant now, though, as between that post and this one I have learned that being flat on my back like required to fit under a car has apparently become an incredibly goddamn bad idea of the holy-shit-I-think-I-almost-lost-consciousness variety. So I'm done for at least a few hours.

7908
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: March 30, 2017, 11:37:29 am »
Today's vehicle puzzle for the mechanically illiterate: Remove one bolt from an engine, so that it may be removed. Which bolt? You don't know. Where is it on the machine? You don't know. What does it look like? Don't know. Direction necessary to approach it? Probably from below! Remember class, you're hunting for the one bolt still anchoring the engine to the rest of the machine. Hope that winch is in good shape!

Only instructions given that can actually be understood by someone that has no idea what the fuck the parts of an engine are? "Just take bolts out until you get the right one." The right one, that you have no idea which it is.

Like. I appreciate being called in instead of trying to kill yourself doing it on your own, fellow house person, but. Maybe finding someone who actually has some inkling as to what the blue hell they're doing would be a better idea. Just... throwing that out there.

Now to go back outside (85f, 55% humidity, springtime bug resurgence) and poke at a motor some more in hopes of both figuring out which goddamn bolt needs to be removed and managing to do so without ending up in more pieces than I currently am. If I don't post somewhere within a week or two, assume I'm either in the hospital, bled out after losing an extremity, or got crushed by a falling engine block. Goddamn hoarding broken car nonsense.

7909
Ah, that's a familiar sensation these days, though more with spiders, for me. Be glad the wasp is real, and doesn't have friends of a dissimilar nature.

7910
Is idea. They don't seem to have that sort of information, though, at the least not somewhere particularly accessible. Most of the stuff they seem to have on their site is more individual issues or events, rather than stuff that's more... broad? I guess. Can't think of a better word. They're an activist group, not so much statistics wonk. Doesn't seem like that kind of data collation is something they're particularly inclined towards. Or I can't find it at the moment, which wouldn't much surprise me considering the amount and quality of sleep I got last night this morning.

7911
Suffice to say there is a big deep ocean of shit to actually worry about under the frothy surface layer we usually interact with, and this vote is definitely the sort of thing to haunt these congresscritters with when they come up for reelection, but it isn't actually a significant change from the sort of behavioral logging most readily accept from facebook and google.
It kinda' is, though. There's a fairly notable difference between a particular website logging and the ISP doing it. Hard to puzzle out a good analogy, but it'd be something like the difference between being filmed when you drive up to someone else's house, and having the roads you drove lined with hidden cameras.* Surveillance on the service level is a titch less of a concern than surveillance on the infrastructure level. You usually can choose services, when it comes down to it. ISP is not quite so negotiable, particularly if "without" isn't really something you can live with.

*And US wise, we've actually been pretty adamant in a lot of the places the latter largely isn't kosher even in specific areas with overt cameras, never mind everywhere, even for sodding law enforcement, much less ostensibly private companies.

---

... on related subjects, anyone know of a resource that breaks down the historical congressional voting record on privacy (or just specific policy areas in general)? Turns out it seems to be something of a pain in the ass to find summarized records of voting trends in that area. Or any data that wouldn't require digging through several hundred/thousand difference sources to just to have in one place, never mind actually seeing what the leans are.

7912
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: March 30, 2017, 07:09:02 am »
I'm in favour of an eventual Scottish referendum, but not one right now. Of all the bad times.
To be fair I'd guess there is a pretty solid argument that a referendum should at least wait until the end on the EU-UK negotiations so that Scotland can choose its deal knowing what's on the table.
I mean... why? The actual content of the negotiations are kinda' irrelevant. The problem is that they can be started and gone through with in more or less complete defiance of what your people want. Unless the negotiations include full devolution there's not really anything that can be in them that's going to address that, and the sooner you split the sooner your own negotiations can start.

7913
I didn't say you were, and I'm not sure where you got that I said you were attacking anyone. In any case, no, you're not attacking anyone per se, you're just trying to draw out the tired conservative/anti-government nonsense that the two parties are functionally indistinguishable. Which is bullshit on many, if not necessarily all, issues, often times to damn significant degrees. "Corporate trash" manifests significantly differently between the two parties, especially in relation to those of us corporations are trying to exploit. Who, y'know. One of the parties actually tries to protect with something approaching regularity, even if there's still much room for improvement.

It's not about attacking anyone, it's that you're whitewashing what's actually happening in this bloody country. As someone who started getting really pissed off at our media and political narratives in the last few years, it's something that's significantly and increasingly friggin' annoying. It's ignorance at best, and all too damn often in this country it's a straight up malicious attempt to excuse the GOP's asshattery.

You want to call the parties crap or corporate trash, whatever. Maybe don't call them the same sort of crap or corporate trash, because they're seriously not. Spooling out that message for the Nth time is a good chunk of why the parties are in the state that they're in to begin with.

7914
... you say, when we've been talking about a democrat implemented bit of regulation specifically intended to unchip that right, that was gleefully cut down by GOP congressfolk. Like, yeah, congress in general is more than a bit more cavalier on the subject than anyone reasonable would like, but let's not ignore that improving privacy rights and whatnot is actually part of the democrat party platform, and part they've demonstrated before they're willing to legislate towards. And then you have the GOP, party of removing "undue regulatory burdens" and "if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to worry about". Among all the shit related to the police state and national security, on top of whatever other mess I've forgotten or missed.

Both sides of the aisle may love to chip, but one has been trying to go at it with a jackhammer on top of that and the other at least tries to glue bits back together occasionally. Let's maybe not make an equivalence on the subject when the distribution of jackassery is not actually equivalent.

7915
If by likely you mean expressly and repeatedly stated it was going to happen, heh. The new FCC head fellow is a bucket of bought and paid for dicks. Though whether that turns out to be a lie or the current administration gives up shortly on encountering resistance remains to be seen, I guess.

7916
Something focused on rooting out infiltrators might be pretty solid. Kinda' like a crime drama/spy thriller thing except more blaster bombs and snake people. Most of the normal x-comy stuff would be more backdrop than focus, probably. If you want real bonus points, you could ditch nucom and set it in the apocalypse setting. That comes with a fair amount more built-in hooks for intrigue, entire new backdrop points like racial tension and corporate shenanigans, all sorts of mess.

7917
Though yeah, privacy issues have been a problem for a while now. Which is why the regulation that was there was a step in the right direction and all those shits that voted to ditch it can go bugger themselves with a broadcasting antenna.

7918
And it only helps so much, when you're dealing with ISP level data gathering. Stuff still gets picked up going out. For what little it's worth, the regulation itself wasn't particularly in effect and had only been in place a few months ago regardless. Things are back to being more or less no different than it was around November or thereabouts.

7919
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: March 29, 2017, 06:48:27 pm »
Sweet Jesus, that reminds me of final fantasy tactics art for some reason (which doesn't make much sense, since those guys have noses)

Now if only someone would make a game of thrones tactics game :U
Some of them are definitely reminiscent of amano's style, though I'd probably say that was more characteristic of some of the earlier, non-tactics, games. So the concept art, if not the in-game. Makes sense you might pick up on some similarities.

7920
I'd still probably say lex, regardless of the continuity. Literal cartoon villain is something trump's fairly willing to match, and does it with less panache.

... though that said, the question limits the continuity a fair bit, I think. Lex only ended up president in some of them.

Pages: 1 ... 526 527 [528] 529 530 ... 1929