9376
General Discussion / Re: Doc Helgoland's Asylum for the Politically American
« on: October 18, 2016, 12:45:50 pm »
At least until you realize it kinda' shits all over the first amendment, heh.
May 9, 2024: The May '24 Report is up.
News: April 23, 2024: Dwarf Fortress 50.13 has been released.
News: February 4, 2021: Dwarf Fortress Talk #28 has been posted.
News: November 21, 2018: A new Threetoe story has been posted.
Forum Guidelines
... no? Read the snopes thing. Like, in full? The source of the drone claim itself was unverifiable, coming from unnamed "sources" in the state department. The "corroborating" emails could be summed up as "cannot into English" in terms of how much they supported the claim. Clinton noting she can't recall even joking about it is tertiary to what makes the claim effectively empty. There's not actually record of her saying it, just some rando claiming she did, and then citing emails as back up evidence that were nothing of the sort.so the article source is her 'not recalling' telling it? she hasn't the best memory these days.well she was on record asking to "drone" him, so there's that.Sigh... http://www.snopes.com/julian-assange-drone-strike/
i dont see any glottal consonantsT-too lewd. or perhaps, not lewd enough!
i give it a kievan rus/10, would put to the sword and pillage
It isn't THAT uncommon... But usually it is like... an extra 100 votes or something.Oddly enough, the average for lightning fatalities is around 40-50 a year in the US, with the strikes themselves having around a 9-10% chance to kill. So a hundred extra votes would actually be substantially less common than people getting struck by lightning :V
Cheating of any sort of scale is pretty difficult to do.
Small loan of 500 million dollars... y'know, I'm suddenly curious just how much of the american population/electorate would actually qualify for a million dollar loan. Not even sure how you'd measure that.
And what are the chances someone is just false flagging?Non-zero? That's about the best anyone can say at the mo, so far as I'm aware. It's also possible it's intra-party conflict, or just someone that really doesn't like nazis or people who are supporting a candidate spewing at-times-pretty-literal nazi bullshit. Or just some random (possibly drunk) idiot. Won't know until/unless the perp's caught.
It does make me worried that the post-election will not be peaceful.You and everyone else that's paid the least of attention. And molotov induced redecorating aside, we've already seen one bomb plot that was intended to happen the day after the election, stopped. Somewhat unsurprisingly, when a major candidate is encouraging violence and pulling material from extremists (up to and including nazi propaganda), folks get concerned.
It's doing the exact opposite, actually. Adding features rather than taking away. And all customizable.Feature list ain't the problem. Chromium is. Maybe vivaldi's not as bad as your average one, but I ain't going to be trying it to find out. Refuse t'be someone that enables people building off that damn thing by giving them more market penetration.
I'm not going to engage in Clinton-type conduct in attacking.Guy made a liar of himself in the same sentence. How do you even do that with a straight face?