Look. If you can't recognize that blundering out of starvation poverty into a socially-numb politically dysfunctional surveillance state while the whole world is on the cusp of giving up the ghost environmentally is an improvement, but definitely not in the spirit of what anti-poverty measures are about, I can't help you to understand that any more than what I have said.
And if you can't recognize that that improvement is still a bloody tremendous one, please refer to statement you claimed was stripping context. Whatever "spirit" you're reading into the measures can get buggered, frankly. Gains are gains, and large ones are large ones. That's it, as you said. That
is it, and "it" is not "not overly wonderful". It's not a silver bullet but it's a damn good volley of shots to add to the metaphorical bullets flying.
There is a wider picture going on than just endemic poverty, a state most of the world is already not in. There is no progress bar that goes from 0 to 100% on fixing poverty, and once it's filled we've nixed the root of our sick society and repaired the world in the humanistic ideal that things like that are founded on.
No shit, which is why I didn't note a single thing implying it. There's more than one wider picture, but the only ones that endemic poverty
anywhere helps anyone are ones being sought by madmen. Getting poverty as out of the way as possible is, again, a bloody
coup -- for any of us, for all of us. It won't save the world on its own by any means, but it's not improvement to be downplayed.