I don't get sick or go to hospitals because I take care of my self, so I'd rather have my personal freedom and extra money in my pocket, thanks.
I rarely if ever get sick either and even if I get sick, I usually don't go to the doctor either but an accident is just around the corner. If you got in a car accident (which can happen to anyone, no matter how well you can drive), killing the other and severely crippling you, you're fucked from what I understand.
Child birth in a hospital as well brings a +/-10.000 dollar price tag with it, assuming everything goes as it should. In Europe (or atleast, the Netherlands), it's free. You don't have to worry about being able to pay the hospital bill as there is no bill.
Also, you might take good care of yourself but what about your (future) loved one? Or parents? They never get ill either? I'd prefer spending 100 dollars a month, knowing that if something happens it's covered instead of having to cough up thousands of dollars at once for an expensive surgery
I have insurance and I don't get drunk and crash into things with my car.
It's well known, tried, and true: socialized healthcare systems are more efficient than social-security ones, which in turn are more efficient than private insurance ones. Do you think it's a coincidence that the US has one of the highest health-expenses per capita, yet overall most European systems are ranked higher? Keeping that extra change is costing you your health and your money in the long run.
That is probably true, but the healthcare system in the USA is dysfunctional and overpriced for other reasons. Namely that uninsured patients still must be treated in emergencies by law and the hospital foots the bill. The main thing Obamacare was intended to remedy. Like my car insurance being required by law, now health insurance is required too. Unlike taxes, my how much I pay for insurance rate scales with how much of a risk I am. More or less. Same basic goal, different outlook on getting there.
Placing responsibility and liability on the individual allows for greater individual freedom. There is a balancing point of course. Anyways, I wasn't trying to start up some silly political or philosophical discussion, I got carried away discussing something similar and it was just on my mind when it was provoked through causal lurking here.