Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Majestic7

Pages: 1 ... 123 124 [125] 126 127 ... 139
1861
Other Games / Re: Paradox Interactive
« on: April 19, 2011, 05:24:54 pm »

Opinions may differ, but i'd say yes. However "yes" ONLY if you get Doomsday + Armageddon, and not the vanilla. Possibly with a mod called DAIM. You're in for some epic worldshaping and history being re-written.
The Paradox AI is very good mind you, much better than in 3, but still has some holes. DAIM turns it into something more.. worthy.

Some people love HoI3 though, and one should respect that too.

How about Arsenal of Democracy and the Darkest Hour? I haven't played them, but a friend is fapping to the Darkest Hour. I think HOI3 had potential, but it was too big to chew at one bite for Paradox. I like the idea of subordinate AIs, I'd like it even in Europa Universalis, so I could, say, let AI handle colonial warfare. Too bad it didn't work out too good.

1862
Other Games / Re: Paradox Interactive
« on: April 19, 2011, 05:22:45 pm »
No, I like the challenge of building up a country from a few provinces. I've never managed a world conquest, and doubt I will for some time. I really enjoyed playing as Georgia and spending 30-some years getting the upper hand on that little horde next door. I enjoyed turning the Papal States into the Middle East. I loved turning Munster into the America-spanning, China crushing monster-Ireland it became.

I think all those things are possible and 600% more fun in MM. :P

1863
Other Games / Re: Paradox Interactive
« on: April 19, 2011, 05:17:28 pm »
Honestly, I disagree with the Magna Mundi statement. I realise I'm in the minority in this, but I really didn't like Magna Mundi, and I really enjoy vanilla. It's the game I've spent most time on, ever.

As a wild guess, you enjoy taking over the whole world, literally, when starting as a one province minor or the like? Well, to each their own. I find things like that boring, I want historically plausible game. I want there to be problems in maintaining huge empires, instead of it being a breeze to rule two continents. If I want to take over the world, I'll rather play MTW2. Oh wait, I play that too only with mods nowadays (Stainless Steel ftw). 

Yeah, Magna Mundi has some problems - like how ridicilously powerful Barbary Pirates are. Like if you have a huge land empire with one (recently conquered) port, how on Earth can a single pirate raid totally destroy your economy for years... Likewise pissing off the Emperor of HRE has silly effects, the negative effects of HRE displeasure should dilute with distance to it or something.

edit - I'm having a dyslexia day or something, loads of typos everywhere.

1864
Other Games / Re: Paradox Interactive
« on: April 19, 2011, 05:09:50 pm »
Europa Universalis II was a good history teacher with all the historical events. EUIII is just a generic strategy game sandbox. It is pretty boring as vanilla, Magna Mundi totally saves it. I'm definitely going to buy Magna Mundi the game. Regarding their new games, I look forward to CK2, but it will likely fall short again, mainly offering sandbox enviroment and mods will provide the real content. Regardless, as Paradox is the only of its kind in making strategy games like that, they deserve all the monetary support they can get.

1865
Other Games / Re: Alfie gives away some games
« on: April 19, 2011, 11:43:24 am »
Congratulations for winners, hemmingjay especially deserved it. :P Damn, I really never win anything.

1866
It looks too much like a generic RTS, I was hoping for something more strategic with stronger atmosphere. :/ Well, at least the HBO serie seems fine, based on the first episode.

1867
Other Games / Re: Alfie gives away some games
« on: April 19, 2011, 03:33:11 am »
Maybe this is the first time ever I win something. :P

Amnesia, Audiosurf, Super Meat Boy

1868
As a teenager, I was really struck by Planescape Torment. Mainly because everything wasn't black and white in it like in most fantasy games, the characters had depth in them and instead of the usual world-saving cliches the main plot was very personal for the main character. (and I thought Annah was pretty hot.) No other game has really had that impact later on. I must be one of the few people who bought Torment from a store right when it was a new game. I heard it sold like shit.

 I guess if I had been 10 years younger when I played Witcher, it could have had the same effect, for all the gray choices in side quests. Some of the stuff in Fallout New Vegas have the same kind of atmosphere, I just wish the Legion was not a bunch of bad guys so clearly. 

1869
Other Games / Re: "Civilization"-Building Games
« on: April 17, 2011, 06:43:50 pm »
King of Dragon Pass.

Emperor of the Fading Suns.

Imperialism I & II.

I presume you are familiar with the classics, like Master of Orions etc.

1870
Other Games / Re: How did you last die?
« on: April 17, 2011, 05:24:35 am »
My crew was too drunk to follow commands (my theory or just AI failure) and my fluyt sailed straight into the broadside arc of the enemy galleon. It went downhill fast from there.

1871
Other Games / Re: 4x games suggestions
« on: April 17, 2011, 05:22:34 am »
Armada 2526 Supernova just came out. It is pretty bland in my opinion, but some people seem to like it. Sword of the Stars is a fun space 4X, but yeah, it is mostly focused on battles even though trading is the main money maker in the game. Distant Worlds - already mentioned - is kind of nice. Then there are always space trading games like X-series and Smugglers, though they are not 4X as such. You can win peacefully through economy in Distant Worlds and Armada 2526, but the chances are you'll get dragged into wars during the game.

1872
Other Games / Re: GearHead 2 - Mecha Roguelike
« on: April 14, 2011, 12:59:04 am »
I just don't get it. I have two lancemates. I've had one for a while, the second one is a new addition. The new guys has 10 in all relevant skills and simlar stats to the first guy. Despite this, the new guy is constantly getting his mech destroyed. Both guys drive Vadels. The new guys Vadel is a factory model (I replaced it after he got it destroyed in the first fight), while the old guy has some changes in weapon layout. Regardless, movement, TR and armor is the same for both mechs. Neither has ECM, as I've been unable to buy any. Still the new guy with much higher skills is constantly getting himself wasted. Why? What am I missing? I don't mind losing a mech here and there - I had an interlude where I lost like three mechs in a row, always downgarding and losing an eye in the process - but this is ridicilous when on paper he should be better than the first companion or my main character.

1873
Other Games / Re: What was the first game you played?
« on: April 13, 2011, 05:05:05 pm »
I remember Digger and Budokan too. They were on the same floppy with Alley Cat, so they could have been my first picks as well. Now I went with the alphabet. :P Frogger would be a strong contester as well. King's Quest II was where I learned my English for the first time pretty much, playing it with a dictionary in hand.

1874
Other Games / Re: What was the first game you played?
« on: April 13, 2011, 01:10:03 pm »
I'm not sure if it is _the_ first game, but Alley Cat is the first game I remember playing.

1875
13 because templars totally deserved it.

Pages: 1 ... 123 124 [125] 126 127 ... 139