I wonder if something is being lost to the fairy tale Disney-esque glorification of the whole Robin Hoood drama. Let's reframe the situation:
A thief breaks into your neighbors house. You hear this, and head next door with your gun to stop the crime in process. The thief stands down, but while you're reaching for your cellphone to call the police, the thief's girlfriend walks in and asks you to please let him go. You agree to not call the police, provided she has sex with you. She agrees, and you let them go. Afterwards, the thief beats the girl, calls her a slut, and tells her he never wants to see her again.
Question 1: Did you coerce her?
Question 2: Who's "better?" You, or the thief?
you DID coerce, and i would never do this under any circumstance.
i would be worse than the thief, i used coercion to rape a girl; the thief only attempted theft and got angry (too angry) over his girl letting herself be raped.
Rather then a fine, you could better say it is a bribe.
Bill, Bob, Joe and Jane
Bill and Bob are best of friends and serial thieves/robbers/muggers.
Joe is the Warden and the judicial authority of the region Bill and Bob operate.
Jane is Bob's girlfriend/lover, she is also 'fair', is of 'highborn' blood, and acts as a highborn.
Bill and Bob are locked down in jail for repeated acts of thievery/bank robbing/highway robbery/mugging. (We assume Bill and Bob have tried to escape and failed, multiple times. So no, they cannot get out any other way and are destined to rot there forever.)
Jane goes to petition/plead Warden Joe for the release of Bill and Bob. Warden Joe says he would let Bill and Bob go if Jane has sex with him. She agrees to it and Bill and Bob are let go, no strings attached.
Joe tells Bill and Bob why they are let go. Bob gets pissed, abuses Jane and leaves. Bill then steps in, saying he will support her and devote himself to her. Bill and Jane leave off together.
your scenerio doesnt change a thing at all, whats your point?
i have a few scenarios i want to use to prove my point to most ppl who refuse see it from my point of view:
Scenario A:
The sheriff tells marion that if she wants her soulmate to go free, that she must bring him 50k USD (modern day money). She could either choose to earn this money the slow way by working as a maid (and the sheriff will keep robin barely alive at minimal expense until then) or she could sell herself to slim shady who would gladly pay 50k to have sex with her.
In this scenario i would not call it rape, and she would be ranked pretty high on morality and honesty whatever options she chose.Scenario B:
The sheriff is adamant in his decision to keep robin locked up forever, and tells her to give up on him. Marion does not accept this and instead seduces the sheriff, pleading her attraction for men in police uniforms, convinces him that she honestly finds him sexy (without use of drugs or anything), and steals his keys after he falls asleep from having sex with her.
In this scenario it is consensual sex, she just happened to conveniently be there to steal the keys afterwardsScenario C:
The sheriff tells marion that if she wants her soulmate to go free she must either murder the king of sherwood, steal half the royal treasury including the sacred crown that would make the sheriff the absolute ruler due to its magical powers, and murder anyone else who might stand in his way of becoming king. Or have sex with him.
This scenario is mainly different from the first because no reasonable person would murder so many, putting their entire country into turmoil for the sake of their soulmate. It still is not rape compared to the original because she still has a choice that did not involving losing her soulmate, which knocks it down from "coercion" to "guilt-tripping". The world is expendable, your soulmate is not.