Bay 12 Games Forum

Because clearly random voting Org is a policy lynch on him. Hell, I never said policy lynch at all.

Quote from: Darvi on March 05, 2011, 07:13:06 pm

SirBayer, why are you defending Org's... Orgness?

Because we call it Orgness. It's like saying Pandarsenic making puns is a scumtell. Yeah, it's annoying. Yeah, it's not helpful. But it doesn't actually mean much, in context.

I'll grant that the only way to catch scum-Org is a policy lynch, but I won't stand behind this right now. It's a bad idea and it won't end well. I am fairly willing to put my bet on a useless town-Org.

(Of course having said that he'll be scum.)

So wait, you see Org doing what you call nulltells, so you assume he's town? That makes no sense at all. You're also not willing to scumhunt him to figure this out. You're also passive about it.

Quote from: Ottofar on March 05, 2011, 05:10:56 pm

I find it scummy that you both vote Org with a three-minute interval.

But yeah.

Well, yeah. When people jump on the same guy like that, with basically the exact same reasoning, it's often called a bandwagon. Which is scummy.

Not really. Bandwagoning is about voting without any reasoning at all OR trying to ride on someone else's reasoning. But lemme put it this way. What Org is doing is so unnacceptable that people voting him should be a given. Sure, some people are being a touch lazy about the reasoning and you're more than welcome to question them about it. Of course, I notice you've neglected to scumhunt everyone who's wagoned and are only going after one guy. This is a very odd time to tunnel considering you've got a myriad of targets.

So then who's scummier? The guy who's spouting random nonsense or the guy who's buddying? And yet your vote is where it is - on Org. Haven't even FoS'd me. Just defended yourself.

Who's scummier? The defender of another or the defender of himself?

So you're well aware that you're buddying Org. Hell, you're even chainsaw defending him. Now why might that be? You make no effort to tell Org to shape up or anything! And I'd like to remind you that all you've said about Org is that he's spouting nulltells. So I see no reason you should be defending him except that you're scum.

Unvote, vote SirBayer

I've quickly learned that a lot of people really suck at Poker. Seriously, who goes all-in on a fucking straight draw?

13 players is nearing the point where 4 scum is possible, so I fail to see what makes you think there's only 2 scum.

Modding isn't too hard as long as you stay realistic with your goals.

Balancing is impossible, however.

Thanks Org for quoting a hugeass post with a one sentence reponse. Don't bother trimming down the quote or anything, that would be too convenient.

@Janus: The way you're treating everyone suspecting Zrk is extremely scummy. You defend Zrk with absolutely no reasoning whatsoever. You don't try to explain why the attacks against him are bullshit, you don't mention what makes you think he's town, and you certainly provide no reasoning why you're so passive about the whole deal. But this kind of defense? A passive chainsaw defense? Nah, you're obviously scum. Now the only question is if Zrk is scum with you or do you just like buddying?

One problem is how swingy the whole game winds up being. I'm not sure how swingy is too swingy, though. And an actual game will help with balance testing.

At the very least, start writing the flavor.

Today's the day.

It sees strange to me you would explicitly mention something Super did and claim it was about SaintDraze.