Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - lue

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 31
106
General Discussion / Re: [ლ( ლ)] He comes (Happy thread)
« on: October 25, 2013, 07:49:30 pm »
While reading through TVTropes' series of DW epsiode recaps, I came across this gem in Arc of Infinity:

Quote from: Some Guy on TVTropes
  • It's All About Me: Maxil is positively bored with the Doctor, and spends much of his screentime looking mildly offended or checking his nails. John Nathan Turner actually asked Colin Baker to tone it down, because the show was called Doctor Who and not Commander Maxil. Baker replied that no person would ever consider themselves a minor character in someone else's life, and so he played Maxil as someone convinced he was the main character of the story. Of course, Baker soon would become the main character, making the whole thing quite Hilarious in Hindsight.
I really like Baker's response :D .

108
It's "nonpartisan", but if you look at the Wikipedia entry on it, all but one of the 49 members do have a party affiliation of either Democrat or Republican. And the Democrats are overwhelmingly concentrated in Omaha or Lincoln (the only two cities of more than 51,000 in the entire state).

Likewise, NC judicial elections are technically nonpartisan but candidates frequently dog-whistle their party affiliation by touting their "conservative" or "social justice" credentials. And they tend to receive partisan endorsements. (Don't ask me why we elect judges in the first place.)
A lot of elections are "non-partisan". My town, for example, is electing a new mayor this fall, and we actually have a mayor with a real job. It's theoretically "non-partisan", but both candidates are touting their business experience and support from the Michigan Right-to-Life PAC or whatever. So, really, it's like a primary election for a certain party which espouses these views that shall not be named.
Exactly. Just as gerrymandering is illegal, and yet everyone does it with a wink and a nod. Or how SuperPACs aren't allowed to coordinate with campaigns, but everyone knows they do. It's convenient fiction.
Hey, just because Jon Stewart just so happens to watch the Colbert Report when Colbert just so happens to be talking about things he'd like to do for his campaign had he a SuperPAC, doesn't mean Jon is coordinating with Stephen.

109
I'll be sure to keep mind the "much but logical thinking suffers to some extent" explanation and the "an illiterate person reading a book" analogy. Those are very useful.

So, I guess the perfect test for if you're a jerk is to see if you would self-diagnose as Asperger's to excuse how you're a jerk :P .

I'm surprised everyone has such bad experiences with psychiatrists - maybe I was just very lucky:
Me too. What surprised me more was the fact that people didn't seem to keep trying to find a better psychiatrist/psychologist, though that's not always feasible.

110
The problem with gerrymandering is that it is a decent idea taken to its corrupt conclusion.

The decent idea is that people should be grouped by population density so that rural areas can get a representative who actually cares about their votes. Otherwise you'd get situations where a bunch of people are basically ignored because no politician is going to worry about people who only make up a small percentage of their voting base. So, in theory, you'd have larger rural areas districted together (by total population) with much smaller urban districts and each district is then at least halfway reasonably represented.
Get a variation of the German system - voting districts elect direct candidates, and lists of people provided by the parties are used to add seats so that power distribution in the house corresponds to the popular vote. That even allows for third-party candidates to get into congress without winning a direct mandate!
MMPR for the win! The only bad thing I hear about it for America is that it makes parties a technically "official" part of the political system, which no other part of the political system does, to my knowledge.

But on the other hand, who seriously thinks we might just get rid of political parties "any time now"? And I don't think the FEC or related suddenly wanting candidate lists makes parties any more official than they already are.

So... bump the number of seats in the HoR to 436, then use half for direct candidates, and half for party? I think that sounds good. We also need overhang seats built... (I'm suggesting HoR over Senate because the HoR is supposed to be a representation of the people, and MMPR is supposed to do that awesomely.)

111
Pbzznaqre, gur Angvbany Qrcnegzrag sbe Fhfcvpvba Erqverpgvba (AQFE) unf pbzcyrgrq zvffvba o-gjryir fhpprffshyyl.
* lue flees with purloined secrets


112
Don't let people tell you that you won't get in, at least until you've tried. It's surprising what can happen.

Hell, Yale contacted me to see if I'd be interested in attending--all I did was score well on my ACT and get the second highest score in my school on some prestigious test or another, all utter bullshit; my grades were mediocre, hovering around a 3.8 GPA, and I participated in absolutely no extracurriculars, which is apparently the most important thing now, because uni is about socializing, not learning--but I avoided that like the plague for obvious reasons.
Most annoying thing for me when the whole spiel on college was being given to us throughout high school was that
  • You have to get into at least one extra-curricular, because colleges don't won't "closet cases" or whatever the terminology precisely is. As we all know, learning is a synonym for socializing, and study hall is synonymous with fraternity.
  • "You must visit every college you apply for, to see if it's a good fit for you", followed by no information on what to do if you couldn't financially afford the luxury, thus indicating no such assistance programs existed. It's a sound concept sure (to the point where teachers understand if you're absent for it, yay!), but it seemed to have been invented while forgetting that the magic of transportation and temporary lodging is obtained by exchanging an arcane token of representation of material gain called "extra dollars".

113
Just to clarify, we they only monitor activity. The ones playing figurative DF would be the PNWAD-DAC (Dwarven Activity Control). We're -DAM is well aware that -DAC is currently not controlling anything, on account of the terrible interface.

114
I saw someone mention the IB program. Whoever it was, I'm sorry for you.
'Twas me. The subject matter was at a very enjoyable level, but all the work wasn't :P .

115
I can attest that I am definitely not working for the Pacific Northwest Area Department of Dwarven Activity Monitoring (PNWAD-DAM).

116
Watching that on TDS last night, I happened to notice, from the general vicinity of MSH's quote, that the guy qualified black people and college students as lazy, but not white men. Probably nothing, but it struck me at the time.

117
DF General Discussion / Re: Graphics
« on: October 24, 2013, 10:00:33 pm »
I for one support our new Unicode overlords, and hope they will share their ways with all.

...but seriously, if Adams ever does switch to Unicode, you can suddenly have ☃ in the tundra and ☄ from the sky. Or perhaps play life-sized chess! Possibilities...

118
I knew Diane Feinstein. Also knew Speaker of the House being 2nd in line after the VP. Followed by the President Pro Tempore, or very simply the longest serving member of the Senate's currently serving majority party. I know this because a 84-yr old takes over the US should the top 3 die. Looking over the charts now, it amuses me that eventually the Secretary of Veteran's Affairs is tapped for the job.
As is, terrifyingly, the Secretary of HomeSec. Fortunately, a very large number of well protected people would have to all die in a very short time frame for that to happen.
Fun Succession Fact: One person in the line of succession is protected and kept from the State of the Union every year, just in case. I can't wait for the year where that person is the President :P .

119
I've always been under the impression that ADD would be better named Attention Mismanagement Disorder (AMD), and then have a with/without hyperactivity modifier. Does that name jive with your experiences, those who are confirmed to have ADHD-(H|C|PI) ?

I have ADD (also known as ADHD without hyperactivity, because redundant contradictions cancel each other out, right?) and social awkwardness, primarily due to ~10 years of self-imposed isolationism.
I'm also pretty smart, and am in the 98 percentile with my IQ score. 46 percentile working memory though, which is kinda shitty because I don't retain as much as I could.

I think Bay12 has so many people with various social/mental disorders because we tend to utilize internet forums as a method of human interactions without the pesky social aspects.
The socially awkward by self-isolation and really smart bits sure sounds a lot like me. :D It's not like I was embittered by crummy social interactions (that I'm aware of affecting me, at least) or anything, so it's always been kinda weird.

In the interest of that "hopefully this won't just be us stating our problems for the record" sentiment expressed earlier, I have a question: Asperger's has become a popular (self-)diagnosis as of late. For those of you who have (someone in your life with) Asperger's, are there any novel lights you can shine on what that's like?

People find it attractive specifically because of the way it can excuse them being a jerk socially. I already know it's so much more than just being a jerk, but if there are any ways you can highlight exactly how the social part of Asperger's affects the one with it and those around them, differently than if the, er, "afflicted"* were just a jerk, I think that'd be helpful. Because the symptom lists you may find aren't always designed to explain it.

Spoiler: Aside (click to show/hide)

*Christ, there isn't a good word to put here. Afflicted? Patient? Victim? Please don't kill me for my unavoidably poor choice of words.

120
I personally think the issue of not being represented is outweighed by how such contestable districts would end up leading to moderation.

It's entirely possible that, in a district with even proportions of rural and urban populations, one party may never get their candidates in the House. This is suboptimal.

However, in such a case, every candidate for the seat would have to be more moderate in order to gain enough votes and/or earn the trust of the losing side, which in this district is a competitive part of your constituency. This is good.

(Keep in mind, the American political system was never explicitly created for political parties (no matter how much that's since been integrated); we don't have to make the caucus numbers balance.)

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 31