For those of you who have seen Take Shelter - in your opinion, would the film be better without the ending or worse? Does it cheapen the rest of the movie, or elevate it?
It's been a while since I've seen it, but... I dunno. In a way I liked it, because, y'know... "Happy" ending. I'm personally a sucker for final vindication, because I really relate to that feeling (or rather, wanting to feel it

). But it does mess a bit with the overall conflict of the movie, I'll agree.
As for right now... I'd say keep it. I think the ending being decisively on one side of the conflict may have been necessary here, as otherwise it's not *really* a muddled enough issue throughout the rest of the film for it to be compellingly difficult to make up our minds as to what "really" happened. The ending being as far into the one side as it was, specifically onto the side that leaves
us asking "Wait, what? Can that be right?", might just have been the little kick it needed to keep things from just sort of trailing off at the end.
For whatever else it may or may not be though, it's definitely a film that convinced me to watch whatever Michael Shannon does.