I'm not saying you do, but your notion of, for example, 'peasants' armed with 'footman's spears' and 'hand axes' and 'daggers' are just as ridiculous. In the first place, in the earlier parts of the era where peasants
did compose the bulk of an army's footsoldiery, they didn't have anything close to standardized equipment (not to mention that there was no such thing as a 'footman's spear', unless you meant a spear used by a footman - which could mean
any of the wide variety of spears in use over the long history of war) - and in the later parts of the era the bulk of infantry was composed of well armed, well-trained, and well armored professional soldiers.
Or take other examples from your posts.
In modern times we do not have knights of any shape or form on the battlefeild, that is how badly they were beaten.
This is one of the most ridiculous things you've posted in the whole thread. The reason knights no longer exist on the battlefield isn't because peasants beat them. It's because the economic and social system that led to the rise of the fighting noble class is defunct, not to mention the fact that professional soldiers were more practical.
There were still melee cavalry well into the age of gunpowder even
after the end of the knightly class, which you'd know if, for example, you knew anything at all about warfare up until the late 19th century.
Jeez, dude. Misinformation is one thing, but what you're doing - spouting downright untruths - is straight up terrible.