Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 315 316 [317] 318 319 ... 339

Author Topic: Ok that thing with Kim Jong-un being dead was just CIA japes [DPRK Thread]  (Read 338178 times)

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4740 on: October 16, 2017, 02:43:32 pm »

NK appears to be listening to Trump and not Tillerson because they've said that they reject diplomacy, for now. At least until they are confident that they have a missile that can reach Washington D.C. 'Don't waste your time doing diplomacy, Rex' indeed.

Bit surprising that they'd straight up admit that they don't (or don't think they do) have a missile that can confidently reach the east coast of the US. Either way, them rejecting diplomacy doesn't bode well for everybody.
Logged

Trekkin

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4741 on: October 16, 2017, 02:49:33 pm »

As long as the Manhattan backchannel continues to operate, they haven't rejected diplomacy yet. This is just more bluster, saying "we aren't wasting our time until your mad boy king takes our mad boy king seriously, and we believe he won't until North Korea presents a threat to him personally."

They just don't have the Russians' kompromat to use, so they fall back on this.
« Last Edit: October 16, 2017, 03:02:10 pm by Trekkin »
Logged

Starver

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Logged

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4743 on: October 17, 2017, 12:27:46 pm »

NK is now rattling the metaphorical sabre so hard that it's vibrating by saying "Nuclear War may break out at any moment!". Hard to tell if they're being serious or just blustering.
Logged

Reelya

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4744 on: October 31, 2017, 09:20:12 am »

The latest news is that there was a major accident at NK's nuclear test site.

http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2017/10/31/200-dead-tunnel-accident-north-korea-nuclear-test-site-report

Apparently when they did that big nuclear test, the place collapsed killing 200 of their people.
« Last Edit: October 31, 2017, 09:27:38 am by Reelya »
Logged

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4745 on: October 31, 2017, 09:27:36 am »

You could have linked to an actual article.... Trying to look now, CNN hasn't said anything.
Logged

Reelya

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4746 on: October 31, 2017, 09:28:17 am »

Apparently it happened a little while after the big nuclear test, but we're just finding out about it now. 200 dead because the base couldn't stand up to the blast. That makes it one of the biggest nuclear catastrophes in history.

Also consider that NK is a very small nation, if you look at that propotional to their size, the death toll is similar to 9/11. I'm guessing they lost some pretty important people from their nuclear program in that accident, too, which is one reason they've been so quiet about it.
« Last Edit: October 31, 2017, 09:35:46 am by Reelya »
Logged

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4747 on: October 31, 2017, 09:35:20 am »

That's a rather indirect nuclear catastrophe. There was a reported tunnel collapse detected, but I guess nobody knew how serious it was, until now at least.
Logged

Reelya

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4748 on: October 31, 2017, 09:37:35 am »

If things collapse on top of you because of a nuclear explosion I'd count that as being killed by a nuclear explosion. e.g. for radiation we count deaths decades later as being caused by nuclear bombs, and we also count indirect deaths such as having stuff fall on you because of the blast as being nuclear cause of death. Why not a secondary collapse a few days later? If the tunnel collapsed on the same day or two days later that's not really any different for the cause of death.

EDIT: just note however, that some news articles are giving conflicting dates for when this occured, they don't agree on whether it was september or october right now, so we'll know more later. Still, it's notable because the scale of such an accident given NK's size is huge and would probably be a major blow to their program.
« Last Edit: October 31, 2017, 09:43:54 am by Reelya »
Logged

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4749 on: October 31, 2017, 09:56:41 am »

Sounds more than a simple tunnel collapse, more like a whole network of tunnels. Also, there was an article saying (and is mentioned in the one you linked) that the mountain over the site was starting to collapse. I think that site may be too unstable to use anymore.
Logged

Descan

  • Bay Watcher
  • [HEADING INTENSIFIES]
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4750 on: October 31, 2017, 03:57:03 pm »

I feel like there might be room for some diplomatic outreach here, especially if it were some of the more contra-NK countries involved like the States or Canada or the U.K. offered, if they were to offer assistance in the rescue and clean-up, esp. the countries with experience dealing with nuclear incidents like the States (Three Mile) Japan (Fukushima, even if it wasn't as bad as people make it out to be) Russia (Chernobyl) or Chile (not nuclear, but they have dealt with rescuing people trapped underground recently)

I mean, I doubt the Kimmy would accept it; if for no other reason than it's a secret ("secret") nuclear test facility and they wouldn't want the Americans to learn about their cutting edge gerbil-on-treadmills power station technology (to go along with their early-modern ICBM tech; Ahhh, Norky priorities! "Nuke the world, but what's a lightbulb?") but it's a cheap way to gain diplomatic points just to *offer,* innit? Play The Game and all that.
Logged
Quote from: SalmonGod
Your innocent viking escapades for canadian social justice and immortality make my flagellum wiggle, too.
Quote from: Myroc
Descan confirmed for antichrist.
Quote from: LeoLeonardoIII
I wonder if any of us don't love Descan.

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4751 on: October 31, 2017, 04:05:44 pm »

Only problem with that idea descan is that it's on a nuclear testing site, pretty much exactly the place that NK wouldn't want foreigners (Westerners at least) to have access to.

Also, diplomatic outreach would have been more easily done when it happened, not two months later. I suppose it wouldn't hurt to try, even if it does conflict with their domestic narrative.
Logged

Descan

  • Bay Watcher
  • [HEADING INTENSIFIES]
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4752 on: October 31, 2017, 04:07:46 pm »

That's pretty much exactly what I said in the second paragraph.

And it's kind of hard to do diplomatic outreach for an accident or incident at the time it happened, if nobody knows the incident even occured.
Logged
Quote from: SalmonGod
Your innocent viking escapades for canadian social justice and immortality make my flagellum wiggle, too.
Quote from: Myroc
Descan confirmed for antichrist.
Quote from: LeoLeonardoIII
I wonder if any of us don't love Descan.

Reelya

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4753 on: October 31, 2017, 04:22:31 pm »

And they definitely don't want help. The amount of time since the accident is indeterminate, one source said three weeks ago, an earlier one pinpointed it to a few days after the nuclear test. It's probably the latter date then (oct 10), however, the sheer lack of available information many weeks after the incident is the telling thing. This is not something they want anyone outside to know about or be involved in.

Starver

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A valid discussion topic [DPRK Thread]
« Reply #4754 on: October 31, 2017, 04:37:28 pm »

Send in International Rescue anyway! Thunderbird 2 should have a pod or two capable of helping. There's the Mole and that rock-crusher vehicle, and it seems most of their vehicles are hermetically sealed, plus they also have various suits capable of withstanding heat, hazardous fumes, even radiation (which was handy, due to the heavy use of nuclear engines in their own vehicles, military craft, spacecraft, even civilian transportation and logging/road-construction vehicles...).

So, Brains and Gordon with Virgil. I'd let Tintin go in as well (very competent, much underused), but she'd probably end up getting kidnapped during the tenser moments of the rescue (though not if The Hood is involved, family and all), and FAB1 would probably need to used to solve that problem and clear up the multi-pronged climax.

(At last!  My time spent watching Thunderbirds as a boy, and mentally cataloguing their whole equipment lists turns out not to be as complete a waste of time as my parents told me it would be!)
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 315 316 [317] 318 319 ... 339