I've been wary of you for a while, but it wasn't until now that I had any concrete evidence besides gut-felt suspicion.
The bulk of my concern revolves around your seeming reluctance to scum hunt effectively, despite your being quite active on this thread. You've flipflopped on your vote so much as to devalue it, never sticking to any one target long enough or with enough concerted effort for your voting to achieve much. In addition to this, your justifications for these votes have ranged from poorly constructed to downright scumy. Not that the former reason isn't scummy in and of itself.
it's mostly because you voted against me
I don't actually understand if you said what side you were on so my vote stands
my gut is telling me Roo is scum.
You guys convinced me
the moonlit shadow is the other suspicious person and an easier one to lynch
I guess I was shooting in the dark
forgot to shift my vote
the fact that you aren't using lots of words says you don't want to give stuff away which is also suspicious.
People have made excellent points about why FoU or Arcavasti are scum, I feel we need to put someone under pressure.sooo
you never did claim if you were town
When Kilikan and Fallacy called you out on this, as I'm doing now, you responded with perhaps your weakest post yet.
You want scum hunting? Fine.
Dampe and RedMageCole you have not posted a thing I am accusing you both of scum defend yourselves
I mean, come on. When accused of lazy hunting, you jumped on the easiest targets possible, without applying any real pressure to them whatsoever.
Now, for concern #2. Fillipk's standard response to any kind of scrutiny:
I could be making you all think I'm a newb
this is my first bay12 game
I never played a good forum mafia game
it seems I'm not doing as great a job this game.
...has been to take refuge in his nubosity. This wouldn't be
quite so concerning, if it wasn't for this later exchange:
Moonlit Shadow
Only if someone seems suspicious enough.
What counts as suspicious enough?
Uh. Highly suspicious, with at least one piece of logical evidence, not just interpreting the scumminess of their posts, which, as a noob, I can't do very well.
Again the noob factor, at least try and stop saying you are a noob we know that, its getting kind of suspicious.
So in summary of both posts I believe The Moonlit Shadow is scum because they never let the noob factor drop, its their main defense, and yes I used it but I didn't keep going back to it. I think they are a werewolf hiding behind the noob defense which they keep bringing up when people move in on them.
Yes I realize reasoning is from before they figured out about two scum teams but that is also why I believe they are scum, and made a misstep when they thought there was only one scum team.
Fillipk: Besides hiding behind the noob defense[Which, besides the fact that Roo became a scummier target, is the main reason YOU're alive right now, I might add], what did The Moonlit Shadow do that you feel is scummy?
Yes I realize I'm a hypocrite for accusing TMS of scum because of the noob defense, however I never mentioned the fact outside of my defense and only used the point once, TMS keeps bringing it back up whenever someone even criticizes them. Other then that most of it is reasoning that could still be true if they were scum.
I think Comrade has a good case against you but right now I'm thinking both you and Moonlit are werewolves Moonlit shadow assumed the werewolves didn't set something up but I'm assuming they have a quick topic and could have planned that out. Maybe to draw suspicion away from the fact it smells like a plan.
My main problem with the noob defense is that Moonlit goes and analyzes people and posts really well but all his missteps and mistakes are contributed to being a noob, I admited to mistakes and didn't blame them all on noobness. I think they are a noob scum hiding as a noob town.
After repeatedly using his own status as a newbie to justify questionable actions, Fillipk jumped on The Moonlit Shadow for precisely that offense. And then tried to claim that he'd only used the tactic once. Which calls into question his claim that:
nothing I have posted has been a lie
Lazy scumhunting, lazy justifications, blatant hypocrisy, and outright lies. All
very scummy.
Fillipk, what do you have to say for yourself?
Author
Topic: Two Fold C9++: (3/15) Town Victory: Mutual KO - no replacement after all (Read 46747 times)