Topic: Warhammer or Maul? (Read 3518 times)

TheForgottenOne · « **on:** July 09, 2015, 04:27:18 pm »

like the title states, i'm kind confuse with the effectiveness each of them have, for a hammer dwarf what would be the best choice?

Tawa · « **Reply #1 on:** July 09, 2015, 04:31:47 pm »

Warhammer. You need that shield, and the maul is worse at breaking bones than the regular one.

TheForgottenOne · « **Reply #2 on:** July 09, 2015, 04:38:48 pm »

thank you kind sir ^^

vjmdhzgr · « **Reply #3 on:** July 09, 2015, 05:00:42 pm »

Mauls actually end up being worse weapons due to their significantly higher contact area.

Max™ · « **Reply #4 on:** July 09, 2015, 07:52:01 pm »

Yeah, gotta fiddle with the velocity and such to make a maul worth it.

ZM5 · « **Reply #5 on:** July 19, 2015, 04:16:33 am »

I've seen this question on another thread and it's recommended to change the velocity modifier of the maul to around 10000 to make them practical.