Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 969 970 [971] 972 973 ... 1249

Author Topic: Doc Helgoland's Asylum for the Politically American: T+0  (Read 1297705 times)

Neonivek

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Doc Helgoland's Asylum for the Politically American: Post-Apocalypse
« Reply #14550 on: December 02, 2016, 01:19:26 am »

Sounds like the Democrats got stuck in Liberal Arsehole mode there.  :/ No surprise that they lost their majorities. I can see the reason that the Dems lost this time all the way back where Pelosi said that, as that's the same 'smug eletist' behavior that helped them cost them the election this time around.

And as we know Trump is so humble.
Logged

misko27

  • Bay Watcher
  • Lawful Neutral; Prophet of Pestilence
    • View Profile
Re: Doc Helgoland's Asylum for the Politically American: Post-Apocalypse
« Reply #14551 on: December 02, 2016, 01:19:31 am »

The first half and the second half of that sentence don't match. You can have a reason, even if it isn't a good one.
Fixed! Causes without reason.
Logged
The Age of Man is over. It is the Fire's turn now

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Doc Helgoland's Asylum for the Politically American: Post-Apocalypse
« Reply #14552 on: December 02, 2016, 01:27:54 am »

That, right there, is why Republicans spent so much effort trying to block everything the Democrats wanted. 
There is no reason for blocking everything for eight goddamn years. There are causes, but I cannot imagine reasons.

I can imagine one, having a hate boner for Obama. At least that's the appearance they gave.
Logged

Shadowlord

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Doc Helgoland's Asylum for the Politically American: Post-Apocalypse
« Reply #14553 on: December 02, 2016, 01:34:30 am »

Have you been to Detroit recently?  How about Chicago?  How about Flint?  All three, and many more hard-hit inner cities have been safely Democrat for the last 2 - 3 generations.  You could probably point out problems with large cities that have been reliably republican for similar time frames, but I don't think any exist.  No, you do not want a single party to hold the reigns for too long without competent competition.  Competition keeps the people in power sharp.

Flint's water problems arose as a direct result of republican Governor Rick Snyder and other state officials' actions. Citation is wall street journal.


Also, these cities don't have less jobs and opportunity because their residents have elected Democrats. White flight and corporations leaving cities* resulted in majority black cities. The GOP has consistently supported racist policies since the civil rights era, whereas LBJ** sacrificed the democratic dominance of the country to do the right thing WRT passing the civil rights act, and successive Democrats have tried to build on that. So they elect Democrats. But there can be fatigue there when nobody seems to be doing anything to help them, or worse, when you have something like President Obama's water-drinking publicity stunt which convinced the national media that it was safe to drink the water in Flint... when it still wasn't, and still isn't.

* Reportedly, some corporations are coming back to them now
** LBJ was a pretty blatant racist, but he still did the right thing.

That, right there, is why Republicans spent so much effort trying to block everything the Democrats wanted. 
There is no reason for blocking everything for eight goddamn years. There are causes, but I cannot imagine reasons.

I can imagine one, having a hate boner for Obama. At least that's the appearance they gave.

"To deny President Obama a second term" (And then presumably when he got his second term, they chose to continue in the hopes that it would suffice to defeat his chosen successor)
Logged
<Dakkan> There are human laws, and then there are laws of physics. I don't bike in the city because of the second.
Dwarf Fortress Map Archive

Rockphed

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Doc Helgoland's Asylum for the Politically American: Post-Apocalypse
« Reply #14554 on: December 02, 2016, 01:52:04 am »

Have you been to Detroit recently?  How about Chicago?  How about Flint?  All three, and many more hard-hit inner cities have been safely Democrat for the last 2 - 3 generations.  You could probably point out problems with large cities that have been reliably republican for similar time frames, but I don't think any exist.  No, you do not want a single party to hold the reigns for too long without competent competition.  Competition keeps the people in power sharp.

Flint's water problems arose as a direct result of republican Governor Rick Snyder and other state officials' actions. Citation is wall street journal.

Flint's water problems arose as a result of the city going bankrupt and the state stepping in to take over.  The guy assigned to fix the city's finances just happened to also be, apparently, incompetent when it came to public works (he tried to cut a corner that should not have been cut).  Why Flint and Detroit went bankrupt (and the state of Michigan had to step in to fix their finances), is a much more complicated problem with roots in the race riots of the 60s and factory movement of the NAFTA era.

And I maintain that the nanny-state mentality of many Democrats leads directly to job-movement and lost opportunity.  That, and the reluctance of some Democrats to call a riot a riot.  Consider Baltimore last summer.  There were what, 3 days of rioting?  They stopped the minute the governor sent in the National Guard.
Logged
Only vaguely. Made of the same substance and put to the same use, but a bit like comparing a castle and a doublewide trailer.

BorkBorkGoesTheCode

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Doc Helgoland's Asylum for the Politically American: Post-Apocalypse
« Reply #14555 on: December 02, 2016, 02:31:55 am »

I hate to say it, but I am probably one of the closest things to a conservative on this forum, and I am actually a moderate. (fiscally conservative, socially liberal)

I am both socially and fiscally conservative.  I am, in fact, probably the most conservative person you will ever meet.  For the record, I despise Trump almost as much as the most strident liberals, albeit for different reasons.

What do you want to conserve?
Logged
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Treachery_of_Images

Believe nothing you hear. Or everything. Have fun. Love when?

I frequently use PMs to contact people if I think they would miss a post in the deluge.

wierd

  • Bay Watcher
  • I like to eat small children.
    • View Profile
Re: Doc Helgoland's Asylum for the Politically American: Post-Apocalypse
« Reply #14556 on: December 02, 2016, 02:36:31 am »

a social conservative wants to avoid radical, and untested changes to society, or societal norms.

a fiscal conservative wants to avoid reckless spending by government, and wants to assure that all spending is both necessary, and efficient at performing or furthering a task.

In both cases, it is to prevent enacting or enabling a situation where said changes cause catastrophic harm to the society.
Logged

BorkBorkGoesTheCode

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Doc Helgoland's Asylum for the Politically American: Post-Apocalypse
« Reply #14557 on: December 02, 2016, 02:40:30 am »

a social conservative wants to avoid radical, and untested changes to society, or societal norms.

a fiscal conservative wants to avoid reckless spending by government, and wants to assure that all spending is both necessary, and efficient at performing or furthering a task.

In both cases, it is to prevent enacting or enabling a situation where said changes cause catastrophic harm to the society.
I know the general outline; I don't know Rockphed's culture. My culture's definition may be different.
Logged
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Treachery_of_Images

Believe nothing you hear. Or everything. Have fun. Love when?

I frequently use PMs to contact people if I think they would miss a post in the deluge.

Egan_BW

  • Bay Watcher
  • Perhaps I'll
    • View Profile
Re: Doc Helgoland's Asylum for the Politically American: Post-Apocalypse
« Reply #14558 on: December 02, 2016, 02:41:10 am »

From everything I've seen, fiscal conservatism is about refusing to spend any money on necessary things, not spending money efficiently, but that's perspective for you.
Logged
Down at the bottom of the ocean. Beneath tons of brine which would crush you down. Not into broken and splintered flesh, but into thin soup. Into just more of the sea water. Where things live that aren't so different from you, but you will never live to touch them and they will never live to touch you.

wierd

  • Bay Watcher
  • I like to eat small children.
    • View Profile
Re: Doc Helgoland's Asylum for the Politically American: Post-Apocalypse
« Reply #14559 on: December 02, 2016, 02:45:28 am »

There is fiscal conservative, and there is neocon. A neocon is a "new conservative", who is really just a robber baron industrialist disguised as a conservative.

A neocon wants to enact legislation that will personally line his pockets with gold, and likes to CAUSE problems so that he can propose such solutions.

A fiscal conservative accepts that there is a problem, but wants to spend the least amount of money on it as possible/have it be as money-efficient as possible, so that the government retains a surplus in the event that it encounters an emergency that needs immediate expenditure.

Logged

Egan_BW

  • Bay Watcher
  • Perhaps I'll
    • View Profile
Re: Doc Helgoland's Asylum for the Politically American: Post-Apocalypse
« Reply #14560 on: December 02, 2016, 02:59:59 am »

Well your version sounds totally reasonable, so it's too bad that I've never seen it in practice ever before.
Logged
Down at the bottom of the ocean. Beneath tons of brine which would crush you down. Not into broken and splintered flesh, but into thin soup. Into just more of the sea water. Where things live that aren't so different from you, but you will never live to touch them and they will never live to touch you.

wierd

  • Bay Watcher
  • I like to eat small children.
    • View Profile
Re: Doc Helgoland's Asylum for the Politically American: Post-Apocalypse
« Reply #14561 on: December 02, 2016, 03:13:48 am »

A person who is both socially and fiscally conservative may assert that there is not actually a real problem, especially if it is for a social cause.

For example, giving money to single mothers is not something a social+fiscal conservative will really want to do. They would rather see that there are no single mothers, rather than give them social acceptance as a normal thing. As such, they would be more inclined to see that single mothers get temporary support, while they find another husband, etc-- and that such temporary support is indeed just temporary, with finite, fixed limits, and that it is exactly just barely enough to support them until they do so. They would be very concerned about changes in the incidence rate of this issue, as they would view it as a serious social ill in society that there are children not being raised in classic nuclear families. If the incidence rate goes up, they would be in a serious tizzy over it, not be looking for ways to hemorrhage more money to support them.

I am a moderate, who is fiscally conservative, but socially liberal. I dont see a problem with single mothers, as long as they are able to properly provide for their children. Everyone falls on hard times, and having a social safety net is a good thing, but having people subsist entirely out of it is not acceptable. (For one, it takes money away from people who are just in a rough patch of road, which leads them to persistent poverty if they are not helped in a timely manner-- and two, enabling persistent populations supported by the state creates a persistent underclass which is deleterious to the society.) People getting government assistance should receive just enough to get by, and only for limited periods, and only recieve permanent assistance for VERY VERY special conditions, with strict requirements.

A social+fiscal liberal wants to accept every social choice as being valid, and wants to assure that everyone gets everything they want or need in a comfortable setting, regardless of price of impact to the rest of society.



Logged

Shadowlord

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Doc Helgoland's Asylum for the Politically American: Post-Apocalypse
« Reply #14562 on: December 02, 2016, 03:21:49 am »

By weird's definition I would be a fiscal conservative, or something close. :V

I don't want to slash everything, though. If I had absolute dictatorial power, I would want to improve things to improve outcomes (e.g. better education, prisons that rehabilitate, etc), which likely would require both larger budgets for those things as well as better systems so said budgets weren't squandered. I'm not allergic to taxes (I would want some form of carbon tax especially). I wouldn't want to be wasting money unnecessarily, however. Where money spent can do good, I'm for that. I'm also for finding a way to have a persistent budget surplus to pay off the national debt (slowly but surely), but wouldn't let that stop me from throwing money at emergencies (hurricane cleanup etc). I'd want to take actions which save money in the long run, not the short run. For instance, instead of subsidizing flood insurance for more and more people, or leaving them without it because the oceans are rising and it's not safe to stay where they are, I'd rather ban new homes and selling homes in areas which are at more and more risk due to sea level rise, and compensate homeowners already there sufficiently to allow them to buy a new home even though they cannot sell theirs. Then demolish the homes (or recycle their components) that are in danger so they don't end up being washed out to sea at some point in the future. (Flint residents would get a similar offer, since fixing the problem there requires replacing all the pipes, and doing so releases more metal into them temporarily iirc)

But I recognize that none of this will happen because I don't have absolute power and our actual federal government doesn't tend to have anything resembling foresight or sense.

P.S. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welfare_trap is a real problem and cutting people off from assistance isn't a real solution to it, imho
Logged
<Dakkan> There are human laws, and then there are laws of physics. I don't bike in the city because of the second.
Dwarf Fortress Map Archive

wierd

  • Bay Watcher
  • I like to eat small children.
    • View Profile
Re: Doc Helgoland's Asylum for the Politically American: Post-Apocalypse
« Reply #14563 on: December 02, 2016, 03:28:24 am »

you need to incentivize employment, via an effective and rational minimum wage.

By necessity, government assistance needs to be below this amount, or the perverse anti-incentive manifests.
Logged

Shadowlord

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Logged
<Dakkan> There are human laws, and then there are laws of physics. I don't bike in the city because of the second.
Dwarf Fortress Map Archive
Pages: 1 ... 969 970 [971] 972 973 ... 1249