Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Imic]

I'm ready.

[TheDarkStar]

I'm here.

[fillipk]

I'm here

so if I'm reading this right there are two mafia and 4 town.

In that case. Imic: what would you think if I voted your buddy Hector13

TDS: how would you go about getting lynched as mafia, let's say Imic was your partner.

TWS: Why is your acronym so similar to TDS, are you trying to confuse us?

[Imic]

@Fillipk
I don't mind. Bread for the bread god, I suppose. I mean, I don't know who's who, that is the point of the game after all. Why are you even doing this anyway? It seems random.

[TheBiggerFish]

Two Mafia and four town.  Okay.

...

Huhm.

TheBiggerFish

Filipk:Why put a vote on someone you don't know is town?

[fillipk]

Two Mafia and four town.  Okay.

...

Huhm.

TheBiggerFish

Filipk:Why put a vote on someone you don't know is town?

Why put a vote on yourself if we don't know your town?

[fillipk]

Oh and it looks like this is a hammer thing so lets not put two votes on someone until we are sure we want to lynch them

[TheBiggerFish]

Why put a vote on myself if the town isn't convinced I'm town yet?

Because town or scum I still want to get lynched anyway and I don't have any better targets.

I'm quite concerned that you felt it necessary to even ask that question.

PPE:...Yeah, uh, filipk, you just now figure that out?

[TheBiggerFish]

filipk:Answer my question.

(This is 'I think you're scum' FoS.  Just to be unambiguously clear about the meaning.)

[pisskop]

Wall of Town 1.01

Hector13 - fillipk
TheBiggerFish - TheBiggerFish




Not Voting - Hector13, TheDarkStar, TheWetSheep, Imic



The Green Color in the Votecounts does not reflect any confirmed alignment.
With 6 Alive it takes 4 to Lynch!
Day 01 ends at a hammer or 03FEB17 @4pm est

[TheDarkStar]

As far as I can tell, it's safe to put two votes on someone but not any more in case they are scum.

hector13, what do you think of this conclusion and how did I arrive at it?

[fillipk]

As far as I can tell, it's safe to put two votes on someone but not any more in case they are scum.

hector13, what do you think of this conclusion and how did I arrive at it?

Fair point I thought about it a bit more and agree with you

Why put a vote on myself if the town isn't convinced I'm town yet?

Because town or scum I still want to get lynched anyway and I don't have any better targets.

I'm quite concerned that you felt it necessary to even ask that question.

PPE:...Yeah, uh, filipk, you just now figure that out?

Yeah I don't read the rules very thoroughly all the time, skipped over them when I first signed up, went over them when the game began.

Yes but that means your not doing anything with your vote when its on you, strikes me as a passive scum play who doesn't want to do anything too rash.  Just Intial thoughts though

[hector13]

As far as I can tell, it's safe to put two votes on someone but not any more in case they are scum.

hector13, what do you think of this conclusion and how did I arrive at it?

Reasonable conclusion, and I assume you arrived there by halving the number of votes it takes to hammer. Or hammer-2.

Arguably not so much a reasonable conclusion, seeing as though there are two scum. That's enough for a self-vote and a quick hammer by their partner (further assuming they're not already on the wagon)

Seeing as I want to get lynched, though, let's put me at:

hector13, Lynch-1

fillipk

If you were to choose, would you like everyone to think you're buddying up to Imic or distancing yourself from him?

TBF

You seem to be trying to play an optimum game. What are your plans heading forward?

[fillipk]

As far as I can tell, it's safe to put two votes on someone but not any more in case they are scum.

hector13, what do you think of this conclusion and how did I arrive at it?

Reasonable conclusion, and I assume you arrived there by halving the number of votes it takes to hammer. Or hammer-2.

Arguably not so much a reasonable conclusion, seeing as though there are two scum. That's enough for a self-vote and a quick hammer by their partner (further assuming they're not already on the wagon)

Seeing as I want to get lynched, though, let's put me at:

hector13, Lynch-1

Hahahaha No. unvote

fillipk

If you were to choose, would you like everyone to think you're buddying up to Imic or distancing yourself from him?

They both implicate me as scum however one implicates Imic too while the other puts him against me.  I have no strong feelings one way or the other for this question

[TheDarkStar]

As far as I can tell, it's safe to put two votes on someone but not any more in case they are scum.

hector13, what do you think of this conclusion and how did I arrive at it?

Reasonable conclusion, and I assume you arrived there by halving the number of votes it takes to hammer. Or hammer-2.

Arguably not so much a reasonable conclusion, seeing as though there are two scum. That's enough for a self-vote and a quick hammer by their partner (further assuming they're not already on the wagon)

Seeing as I want to get lynched, though, let's put me at:

hector13, Lynch-1

lol no unvote hector13

Here's my thought process:
If there are two votes on someone, there are two options. If they are town, it's good to get them closer to getting lynched (but scum will do everything they can to avoid hammering anyway). If they are scum, then the most scum can do is do a quick self-vote followed by a hammer from the other scum (or vice versa). But that would immediately flag the second scum as scum because it's really suspicious to put someone at L-1 with so little info. So the second scum has to either wait a bit to vote or convince someone from the town to hammer.

so hector, two questions:
Why did you self-vote? I mean yes, we all want to get lynched, but why did you think self-voting would make someone else vote for you?
And a second question: How many votes can safely be on someone with no further info tomorrow?