Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 1386 1387 [1388] 1389 1390 ... 3511

Author Topic: AmeriPol thread  (Read 3532675 times)

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20805 on: June 12, 2018, 03:40:17 pm »

All I'm saying is, give me an option. Give me any option that's more likely to bring the country to a better place than the Democrats, and I'll vote for them. Hell, I'll volunteer for them.

Your only other option are the Republicans. I get what you're saying about options and third parties, but the political environment as it is right now means that the two main parties have a stranglehold on the system and neither wants to let go.
Logged

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20806 on: June 12, 2018, 03:40:50 pm »

All I'm saying is, give me an option. Give me any option that's more likely to bring the country to a better place than the Democrats, and I'll vote for them. Hell, I'll volunteer for them.
I'm glad you asked. (Note the membership explosion)

So get out there and primary some sentient statues of liver cancer.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

SalmonGod

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nyarrr
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20807 on: June 12, 2018, 03:41:23 pm »

All I'm saying is, give me an option. Give me any option that's more likely to bring the country to a better place than the Democrats, and I'll vote for them. Hell, I'll volunteer for them.

We have to demand it.  We have to stop giving them a free pass because of this good cop/bad cop culture war routine.  We have to vote for 3rd parties even when we know they won't win to put our numbers on the map.  Until it truly sinks in that we won't settle for voting against our own interests anymore, we'll keep getting served the same shit.  Instead of them scaring us with "vote for us or the Republicans will win!", we need to scare THEM with "give us something to vote for or the Republicans will win!"

Edit:

Yeah, it's that or actually give up on the Democrats and truly support a third party like the one MSH linked.
« Last Edit: June 12, 2018, 03:43:59 pm by SalmonGod »
Logged
In the land of twilight, under the moon
We dance for the idiots
As the end will come so soon
In the land of twilight

Maybe people should love for the sake of loving, and not with all of these optimization conditions.

UristMcChladni

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20808 on: June 12, 2018, 03:46:25 pm »

All I'm saying is, give me an option. Give me any option that's more likely to bring the country to a better place than the Democrats, and I'll vote for them. Hell, I'll volunteer for them.
I'm glad you asked. (Note the membership explosion)

So get out there and primary some sentient statues of liver cancer.
I mean, I'm down with that, and if they can keep up the momentum from PA and keep their membership ballooning, that might eventually be a feasible option. But where I am right now, identifying with the DSA is going to mean voting D.

Quote from: Michael Harrington
The Democratic Socialists envision a humane social order based on popular control of resources and production, economic planning...and racial equality.

I mean, you're gonna get the hackles of people on the right up, but it seems that even the most tepid progressive policies do that, so I'm down for going full socialist.

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20809 on: June 12, 2018, 03:51:22 pm »

Make no mistake, the DSA is an entryist organization rather than a third party.

But that's why they're, you know, actually successful. Those two big tents aren't catching on fire anytime soon, but the ringleader can change. Trumpian nationalists were a minor but recognizable current within the GOP, now they are the defining leadership of the party.

The idea of "don't wake the Republicans" is a shitty strategy anyway. You shouldn't go around mocking people en mass like Hillary, but her problem wasn't that her policies were "too leftist" (hah), it's that she came off as thinking she was better than the public.

You might be surprised to believe how willing "always Republicans" are to listen to radical leftist thought if you don't sit around insulting them. In my experience, they're often even more receptive than centrist liberals.
« Last Edit: June 12, 2018, 03:55:27 pm by MetalSlimeHunt »
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20810 on: June 12, 2018, 03:53:17 pm »

All I'm saying is, give me an option. Give me any option that's more likely to bring the country to a better place than the Democrats, and I'll vote for them. Hell, I'll volunteer for them.
I'm glad you asked. (Note the membership explosion)

So get out there and primary some sentient statues of liver cancer.

They've definetly had a revival in recent years, but they still pale in comparison to the size of the two biggest third parties, let alone the two main.

Interestingly, they don't show up on the wiki page for third parties in the US, despite listing parties with lower membership.

Make no mistake, the DSA is an entryist organization rather than a third party.

But that's why they're, you know, actually successful. Those two big tents aren't catching on fire anytime soon, but the ringleader can change. Trumpian nationalists were a minor but recognizable current within the GOP, now they are the defining leadership of the party.

edit: Or because it's an entryist organization, whatever that means.
Logged

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20811 on: June 12, 2018, 03:57:38 pm »

Basically, the DSA is like a political caucus within the Democrats, except they don't care if the Democrats authorize their presence. They endorse candidates and have affiliates, perform political activities like canvasing for those candidates and such. But if the DCCC were to come down from on high and tell them to make their candidates support The War, they'd tell them to get fucked.

The DSA's ultimate goal is to usurp the very real governing power structure within the Democratic Party.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20812 on: June 12, 2018, 04:03:01 pm »

The DSA's ultimate goal is to usurp the very real governing power structure within the Democratic Party.

Isn't that the goal of every single third party or political caucus within a party (at least those that have national aspirations)? To eventually take the reins of government? You gave an example of one in the post previous to the one I quoted.
« Last Edit: June 12, 2018, 04:04:46 pm by smjjames »
Logged

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20813 on: June 12, 2018, 04:07:27 pm »

Well, not every political organization. UKIP didn't try to take over the Ories from within, they tried to replace the Ories. And then the Ories started mutilating themselves, crying "I can be like UKIP too! LOVE ME".

And that's how we got Brexit.

But in the US political situation there's basically nothing but trying to knock one of two party establishments out of power.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

UristMcChladni

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20814 on: June 12, 2018, 04:10:09 pm »

within the Democratic Party.
reins of government
There's the difference. Third parties want to establish novel parties. The DSA wants to reform the democratic party. Of course both promote candidates for government positions.

Think tea party, but with socialism. And probably more tea. The tea party was never a third party.

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20815 on: June 12, 2018, 04:15:15 pm »

I did mean just those in the US. I can imagine that if we had a more Parliament-like party system, there'd be a huge load of parties with a few being big, but probably not complete domination.

@UristMcChladni: Yeah, the Tea Party was a movement within the Republicans, similar to the one within Democrats which is kind of a nameless amorphous shape right now.
Logged

Lord Shonus

  • Bay Watcher
  • Angle of Death
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20816 on: June 12, 2018, 04:21:19 pm »

The important thing to remember is that the two big US political parties are a closer analog to European political coalitions than they are to European political parties. With very little effort, you can identify many sub-parties in both major blocs - Looking at the Democrats, you big ones like the "Labor Rights" wing and the "Enviromentally responsible wing", smaller ones such as the "Campaign Finance Reform" or "Bring Our Troops" home wings, and fringe groups like the handful of outright socialists. An "entriest" party aims to become a major one of those sub-parties, and thus redirect the coalition to their goals.
Logged
On Giant In the Playground and Something Awful I am Gnoman.
Man, ninja'd by a potentially inebriated Lord Shonus. I was gonna say to burn it.

WealthyRadish

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20817 on: June 12, 2018, 07:59:14 pm »

As has been said a billion times, the issue isn't that the two parties are too popular (obviously) or even too rich and powerful, it's that our election rules make it extremely difficult for more than two parties to compete in a stable system. The congressional elections with high-population FPTP single-member districts in particular are so extremely weighted against third parties that they may as well not exist, and as most state governments mirror the congressional system, they hardly have a chance there either. The whole American political system is generally undemocratic and unresponsive whether third parties are desired or not, but mysteriously this issue never comes up in the national media aside from the odd reporting on gerrymandering.

The argument that the parties are internally varied and more like a coalition falls flat in my opinion, since even if this were true in the past, the development of 20th century telecommunications and mass media has so extensively homogenized american culture and politics that regional differences are weaker than ever, and where they do manifest in politics will largely only do so within the two-party framework (i.e. little actual deviation from the mainstream, just varying in intensity and in particular around strong single-issues).
Logged

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20818 on: June 12, 2018, 09:31:48 pm »

The problem is that in the current hyperpartisan environment, neither party wants to give even a nanometer to the other, so, I don't see any solution out of it because any solution is going to involve relaxing both parties grip on the system.

You know that three Californias thing you may have heard of? Well, it's now on the ballot for November. Ballotpedia page

While it makes for an interesting thought experiment and a discussion on the merits of it is fine, I'm not okay with having a single person decide how to split up California, it should be the people of California that decide how to split it up.

The guy behind the ballot measure is also rumored to have Russian connections, so, nope.
« Last Edit: June 12, 2018, 09:41:41 pm by smjjames »
Logged

redwallzyl

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20819 on: June 12, 2018, 09:36:14 pm »

I'd have to review my standards of law, but I'm pretty sure that only the federal government can make decisions regarding what land is occupied by what state, so I'm not sure what that's supposed to accomplish?
I think so but I know that Texas has some special thing where it can just dissolve itself into like five states.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 1386 1387 [1388] 1389 1390 ... 3511