Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 1387 1388 [1389] 1390 1391 ... 2466

Author Topic: AmeriPol thread  (Read 1473727 times)

Not good with names

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20820 on: June 13, 2018, 05:13:58 pm »

With Trump, I think it's because he's been made fun of for 40 years.  There's just very little that hasn't been said, and what we got left is pretty stale.  The problem with the comedy of Trump running a future Dystopia is that Back to the Future Part II and a fair number of other movies have already made the joke.  But specifically, Jon Stewart has been like that since at least the rally to restore sanity, where his comedy act became less an act and more a lecture (Which come to think of it, happens to a lot of older, famous comics.)  So yeah, that's sort of a thing where if you hadn't seen the daily show in it's final years you might be expecting something... funny.  (And I really hate Trump)

As for in general, comedy needs conflict. So it's likely that yeah, if you got beef with the powers that be, you're going to express it, that's mostly the history of comedy and satire.  It's not like Duck Soup presented a plan for world peace (Well, maybe it involved something untoward with Mrs. DuMont), but hey it still holds up.

Edit: several replies while I composed this.  I will say Jon Stewart was actually funny at one point.
Logged

Urist McScoopbeard

  • Bay Watcher
  • Damnit Scoopz!
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20821 on: June 13, 2018, 05:14:36 pm »

Colbert is/was pretty funny and I usually enjoy John Oliver (if you're actually looking for something).

EDIT: Also, good answers peeps, thanks for talkin.
Logged
This conversation is getting disturbing fast, disturbingly erotic.

MrRoboto75

  • Bay Watcher
  • Belongs in the Trash!
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20822 on: June 13, 2018, 05:50:25 pm »

Which late show hosts are very funny then?

Well, none.
That only tells me you either don't have a sense of humour, or are offended by the audacity of their jokes.

look at the stupid thing republacans/democrats are doing now

*laugh track*
Logged
I consume
I purchase
I consume again

Folly

  • Bay Watcher
  • Steam Profile: 76561197996956175
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20823 on: June 13, 2018, 05:51:25 pm »

I second John Oliver. And Colbert back on the Colbert Report; I honestly haven't watched him since he changed networks.
I'm also a fan of Jordan Klepper's recent work on The Opposition.
Paul Tompkins was very amusing on 'No, You Shut Up', but sadly that ended a couple years ago.
Logged

Gentlefish

  • Bay Watcher
  • [PREFSTRING: balloon-like qualities]
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20824 on: June 13, 2018, 06:27:18 pm »

Can I third Oliver?

And of course it’s “look at the party in power and their shitty hijinks” because that’s an accurate portrayal of America as a whole especially when it comes to pseudo news

Max™

  • Bay Watcher
  • [CULL:SQUARE]
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20825 on: June 13, 2018, 07:03:55 pm »

It's difficult to work in a field involving political parody when even making the joke about how politics is parody feels passe at this point.
Logged
Engraved here is a rendition of an image of the Dwarf Fortress learning curve. All craftsdwarfship is of the highest quality. It depicts an obsidian overhang which menaces with spikes of obsidian and tears. Carved on the overhang is an image of Toady One and the players. The players are curled up in a fetal position. Toady One is laughing. The players are burning.
The VectorCurses+1 tileset strikes the square set and the severed part sails off in an arc!

PTTG??

  • Bay Watcher
  • Kringrus! Babak crulurg tingra!
    • View Profile
    • http://www.nowherepublishing.com
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20826 on: June 13, 2018, 08:02:57 pm »

Satire died when Trump actually put an global warming denialist in charge of the EPA. But, why blame satirists for their field being rendered obsolete? And is it really worth considering at all, instead of the actual things the conservatives are doing?

That last statement is my general response to a lot of criticism of the left. From SJWs to fractionalism to offending moderates to insufficiently offending moderates, these are all not really important issues compared to influence peddling, regulatory capture, profiteering and nepotism, racism and open support of domestic terrorists.
Logged
A thousand million pool balls made from precious metals, covered in beef stock.

Max™

  • Bay Watcher
  • [CULL:SQUARE]
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20827 on: June 13, 2018, 08:34:02 pm »

I mean, I guess denialist isn't as stupid sounding as denier, so good on ya there, though I'm pretty far left so it's hard to call that a pure left/right issue, but the biggest criticism of the left is that it's really the center at best.
Logged
Engraved here is a rendition of an image of the Dwarf Fortress learning curve. All craftsdwarfship is of the highest quality. It depicts an obsidian overhang which menaces with spikes of obsidian and tears. Carved on the overhang is an image of Toady One and the players. The players are curled up in a fetal position. Toady One is laughing. The players are burning.
The VectorCurses+1 tileset strikes the square set and the severed part sails off in an arc!

Reelya

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20828 on: June 13, 2018, 08:53:42 pm »

That last statement is my general response to a lot of criticism of the left. From SJWs to fractionalism to offending moderates to insufficiently offending moderates, these are all not really important issues compared to influence peddling, regulatory capture, profiteering and nepotism, racism and open support of domestic terrorists.

On their own they're not important issues. However, anything that prevents the Democrats from being considered a viable alternative does in fact empower all the latter vices you mentioned.

Pushing the Democrat further to the left in fact shifts the "line" to the left, which in fact allows the other side to push further right without losing as much support as they would otherwise.

Sure you can say fuck moderates and that SJW aren't a real issue, however they're a perceived issue by moderates and it's the moderate voters you need to win to win elections. That's how it works.
« Last Edit: June 13, 2018, 09:01:40 pm by Reelya »
Logged

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20829 on: June 13, 2018, 09:01:24 pm »

That's fallacious. Nobody ever says the Republicans need to play a useless passionless centrist Because That's How You Win The Votes. They run people one step short of nuclear war and do fine.

Centrists are not more electable than other people. The left is flippantly dismissed in spite of strong victories without the support of the goddamned Party, sometimes in districts so red the Democrats just let them go.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

Reelya

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20830 on: June 13, 2018, 09:03:42 pm »

Again, this is a strawman. i didn't say "centrists are more electable".

I said ... you physically cannot win without picking up the moderate vote. However you go about it. This is just a reality check. You cannot win with only die-hard liberals voting for you.

so what's the strategy then? How are the Democrats going to appeal to Joe Average who doesn't have a strong party affiliation either way? Just relying on the other side to implode isn't always guaranteed to work.

For example and to point out the difference between appealing to the center vs "being a centrist candidate", Sanders was potentially more appealing to the center voters who aren't party affiliated than Clinton was. He did better in polling vs Trump than Clinton did for this reason.

EDIT: One example of why the current strategy is lacking is demonization of people who voted for Trump last time. They clearly have the numbers where it counts. Those are the people you need to win next time, so pushing them away is a losing game. Sure, you can loudly say they're all terrible people with views that don't matter, but how exactly is that going to change the outcome of the next election?
« Last Edit: June 13, 2018, 09:19:31 pm by Reelya »
Logged

Enemy post

  • Bay Watcher
  • Modder/GM
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20831 on: June 13, 2018, 09:06:49 pm »

I found out about John Oliver when an angry guy on Reddit compared my humor to him. It was the nicest insult anyone's ever given me.
Logged
My mods and forum games.
Enemy post has claimed the title of Dragonsong the Harmonic of Melodious Exaltion!

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20832 on: June 13, 2018, 09:10:52 pm »

There is no "moderate vote" in reality. Nor is there really a conservative or liberal or socialist vote. Looking at it like that leaves one utterly incapable of explaining and learning from voter patterns like Sanders/Trump or Obama/Trump. It leads one to utterly mad conclusions like "Trump is a true moderate president who managed to split the center".

Medicare For All is supported by most Americans, and is an issue far too "left" even for most of the left Democrats. Where the fuck is that strat? Most Americans also support radical election law reform and just about everyone is sick of capitalism, but cannot articulate their feelings because those discussions are exiled from mass media.

Trump literally got some of the anticapitalist vote by knowing nothing about economics, because his deviance from The Line was water to the desert of economic political discussion in the US.

Winning voters just doesn't work like popular analysis portrays it. Demonstrably. I could say that "centrists will vote for socialist candidates if they have them available", but that's still misrepresenting how all this really works.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

Max™

  • Bay Watcher
  • [CULL:SQUARE]
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20833 on: June 13, 2018, 09:34:09 pm »

I mean, the Democratic Socialists of America are a thing and actively trying to push the DNC further left to pick up voters who simply don't bother showing up when given a giant douche or a giant turd sandwich to pick between.
Logged
Engraved here is a rendition of an image of the Dwarf Fortress learning curve. All craftsdwarfship is of the highest quality. It depicts an obsidian overhang which menaces with spikes of obsidian and tears. Carved on the overhang is an image of Toady One and the players. The players are curled up in a fetal position. Toady One is laughing. The players are burning.
The VectorCurses+1 tileset strikes the square set and the severed part sails off in an arc!

EnigmaticHat

  • Bay Watcher
  • I vibrate, I die, I vibrate again
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20834 on: June 13, 2018, 10:09:48 pm »

I'd also point out that US political discussion gets pushed into narrow channels that don't fully express what's going on in the country.  Abortion, LGBT issues, states rights, whatever the fuck the vagaries of "small government" and "the economy" are supposed to be.  The information we're provided about candidates distills complicated issues into a series of yes-no questions.  Bernie and Trump both had issues outside those questions and only could get their messages across by being so entertaining and difficult to summarize that news companies would just show footage of them talking.  And yes I would say Bernie was entertaining, he was dry but he was blunt and very determined to stay on message.

Other issues outside the yes-no summarization: environmentalism wasn't part of the mainstream political discussion until Al Gore went and made it part.  Nowadays, legalizing pot (and more broadly, undoing "hard on crime" and "the war on drugs") is an issue that's been broadly important to many Americans for a long time yet its been mostly absent from the party platforms and the mainstream news discussions.  Although that's changing.  Let's see... police reform, huge issue on the local government level but tiny issue on the state and federal level.  Net neutrality is another big one.  Foreign policy is a huge issue that gets neglected.  When politicians get asked questions about diplomacy they get asked fundamentally shallow questions like "what would you do to promote peace in the Middle East?"  There's just no effective way to answer that until you're elected, and no one is going to say that they don't *want* peace in the Middle East.  A question like "do you believe we should continue sending arms to Saudi Arabia" or "Do you think the cartels are a threat to the US?  Is it our place to try to stop them and if so what would you do?"  Or even something like "if the EU had an economic disaster right now would you loan them money to keep countries from defaulting or would you cut them off?"  Just... something vaguely hardball that would reveal something of substance about how a candidate thinks.  Obviously every candidate in a primary* is going to have the same answer to a vague question like "what will you do to win Americas' wars/help the economy."

I guess what I'm saying is in the US we so rarely see candidates running on their own issues.  Al Gore, Bernie and Trump being obvious exceptions.  Most candidates slot themselves into the same party line issues.  And so we get the odd situation where the 2000 elections and 2016 elections featured similar talking points in a vastly different world.  Or at least that's what it feels like, I'll admit that I've only been politically aware for like 10 years.  Someone older than me can talk about that one but from where I'm sitting it feels like our political "issues" have remained static through like 4-5 decades of important change.

*...prior to 2016
Logged
"T-take this non-euclidean geometry, h-humanity-baka. I m-made it, but not because I l-li-l-like you or anything! I just felt s-sorry for you, b-baka."
You misspelled seance.  Are possessing Draignean?  Are you actually a ghost in the shell? You have to tell us if you are, that's the rule
Pages: 1 ... 1387 1388 [1389] 1390 1391 ... 2466