Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 1394 1395 [1396] 1397 1398 ... 3513

Author Topic: AmeriPol thread  (Read 3580356 times)

PTTG??

  • Bay Watcher
  • Kringrus! Babak crulurg tingra!
    • View Profile
    • http://www.nowherepublishing.com
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20925 on: June 19, 2018, 05:55:13 pm »

Not for the first time, but yes.

Fair enough. See y'all at the protest.
Logged
A thousand million pool balls made from precious metals, covered in beef stock.

SalmonGod

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nyarrr
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20926 on: June 19, 2018, 06:26:53 pm »

George Takei on the subject...

Quote
‘At Least During the Internment …’ Are Words I Thought I’d Never Utter
Quote
At least during the internment, we remained a family, and I credit that alone for keeping the scars of our unjust imprisonment from deepening on my soul.

Something just clicked with my understanding of far right psychology...

They like to construct their identity around being hated.  I constantly see them describe other people's disagreement with them as hatred of them or the things they identify with.  "They hate our country.  They hate our freedoms.  They hate Jesus.  They hate Christmas.  They hate babies." etc...

Maybe they're trying so damn hard to make everybody hate them so that it can be true, and the self-image that fuels them can be validated.  Validation of self-image is a pretty damn strong psychological imperative...
Logged
In the land of twilight, under the moon
We dance for the idiots
As the end will come so soon
In the land of twilight

Maybe people should love for the sake of loving, and not with all of these optimization conditions.

EnigmaticHat

  • Bay Watcher
  • I vibrate, I die, I vibrate again
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20927 on: June 19, 2018, 06:45:22 pm »

Quote
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office is praising the "courageous" decision by the Trump administration to pull out of the U.N.-backed Human Rights Council.
I wonder if its ever occurred to Netanyahu that if we don't have any friends, he doesn't have any friends...

Edit:  Or that we've been backstabbing our allies and Israel is on that list.
I wrote a little poem:
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
« Last Edit: June 19, 2018, 07:06:48 pm by EnigmaticHat »
Logged
"T-take this non-euclidean geometry, h-humanity-baka. I m-made it, but not because I l-li-l-like you or anything! I just felt s-sorry for you, b-baka."
You misspelled seance.  Are possessing Draignean?  Are you actually a ghost in the shell? You have to tell us if you are, that's the rule

nenjin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Inscrubtable Exhortations of the Soul
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20928 on: June 19, 2018, 06:55:42 pm »

Let me relate a story that happened last week while on a work trip.

Been working with this guy for probably 7 years now. He's probably 30 years my senior. He's always been far right but kept it in check most of time around me. This is the Texas/Southern crew who say n***** in casual conversation with each other. I've talked about them before.

So this trip he was spoiling for a fight. Kept casually mentioning unprompted how he was proud of Trump for the whole North Korea thing. Good work, glad it pissed off the Liberals, at least someone is doing something, all the usual rhetoric. He's been posting lib bait Facebook memes with regularity for like the last month.

I stupidly decide to engage him on the topic.

We don't get very far on that particular topic because he generally doesn't allow me to get a word in edgewise, and keeps jumping to the next thing that pisses him off. I comment he seems angry. "Oh I'm not angry." 30 seconds later he's ragging on Obama.

He finally lands on immigration. "Why they hell do they always send us their poor and their criminals? Why don't they send us doctors and engineers and shit."

(Point in fact, they do send us their talent as well as their least.)

"It says right on the statue to send us their poor."

"Nah fuck that."

(That bit was actually added to the statue after it was built but it's been a part of it and of our immigration policy for most of its life and all of mine.)

I don't even get a chance to talk about that further before he jumps again.

"Austria just closed like 3 mosques and kicked those bastards out of the country. Why can't we do that!"

"Because it says in the Constitution we don't do that."

"Nah, fuck that."

"What do you want me to say? It's _in_ the Constitution." (I would have gone on about how the people who wrote the Constitution fled a country where their churches were under attack, but he didn't really give me the chance.)

"Nah, fuck that. Your generation is fucked in the head! I'm done! You guys are fucked in the head."

*storms off*

"Cmon man, let's not leave it at that."

"No fuck that I'm done."

Later on we "made up" and went back to talking and chatting about non-political stuff. But that one will stick with me.

Quote
I constantly see them describe other people's disagreement with them as hatred of them or the things they identify with.  "They hate our country.  They hate our freedoms.  They hate Jesus.  They hate Christmas.  They hate babies." etc...

They're just coming to terms with what has always been behind polite conversation. People on the other side of the spectrum don't just disagree with their views, they're repulsed by them. The same repulsion a conservative far right Christian feels about abortion and gay marriage is the same moral repulsion a liberal democrat on the left feels about wanting to make an entire religion illegal or dictating what you can do with your body or what rights you're allowed to have based on your sexual identity. What kept the Left and Right talking to each other pre-Trump was the fact the Right kept their actual opinions to themselves for the most part, while the Left would loudly denounce those beliefs to the air (while pointedly staring at people on the right.)

All Trump has done is obliterate polite conversation, stripped away the pretense. No one is pussyfooting around their beliefs anymore or carefully trying to make a seemingly neutral argument for it in public. People on the far right now feel empowered to say exactly what they feel, and their anger is them preparing to be bombarded with dislike and yes, hatred, for saying it loudly and in public. People on the far left now feel morally obligated to stand just as tall and denounce people to their face because there is no moral ambiguity left to let shit quietly slide. If someone boldly proclaims <the worst shit imaginable>, it is no longer the case that everyone just kind of glances away and ostracizes them via not acknowledging them. That's old American polite political discourse. That's how we used to informally set boundaries on acceptable political speech.

Now those ideas are no longer being ostracized by default in every day conversation. People may not agree but they're no longer treating those people as on the fringe. And so those on the far Left now feel like if you don't call out <the worst shit imaginable>, you're essentially giving it a pass.

Which is exactly how the right feels about abortion and gay marriage. I hate to say it, but now the Left truly knows what the Right been experiencing for the last 35 or so years as America has steadily grown more progressive and diverse. The fears about what will happen to the country under Bush now seem almost benign compared to how fast and dramatically Trump is changing shit around. And the Right is jubilant about how much this is scaring the Left. The outrageous and frankly unacceptable things some of them are saying are just an effort to twist the knife further, by saying it louder and with so little shame it's almost become arrogance. What scares me a bit is that it feels like they're riding an emotional high off of all this, probably the same way liberals on the left were crazy excited when Obama was elected. The Right now sees the Left losing its mind over Trump, and how he is rolling back one section at a time all the progressive changes that go back before my time. They believe it's just deserts for the Left. And they're adding fuel to the fire but are in no way in control of anything that is happening. This isn't some coldly managed Republican take back of the country. This is populism with zero control or accountability. That will eventually come back to bite everyone collectively in the ass.

Which is a point I tried to make my friend there, and it's the only thing I said in our little exchange that even gave him pause. He said all this ridiculous shit and went 'Hell I don't care, I'm gonna retire soon anyways.'

To which I replied "Yeah but the rest of us still have to live here. We still have to get jobs, pay bills and take care of families. We have to deal with the chaos you're cheerleading." And he nodded for a minute and immediately thought of his grandkids and almost, for a second, we had a sort of understanding that we are actually all in this together.

And then it disappeared like smoke on the wind, because he reminded himself he's providing for his grandkids and that was "good enough." He passed his moral gut check by looking as far as his immediate family and calling it good.

Honestly I've just had a bad day of sampling too much political negativity out there. Watched a youtube video of that teacher of the year up in Washington that resigned and made national headlines for crying during her resignation speech and talking about all the bad shit going down at their school.

And I made the mistake of reading the comments. Every. Single. One. was just like "black people." About 50 comments in it advanced to "lynch em." You're used to seeing that stuff in Youtube comments. But the sheer density and consistency of them was.....scary. That and all the posts just blanketly saying "thanks Dems" until it became Dems fault that the entire country ever went down the wrong path. No one wants to fix shit. They just want someone to blame.

We are headed for dark days.

Quote
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office is praising the "courageous" decision by the Trump administration to pull out of the U.N.-backed Human Rights Council.

I guess Human Rights are only useful when you're the one that needs them.
« Last Edit: June 19, 2018, 07:48:07 pm by nenjin »
Logged
Cautivo del Milagro seamos, Penitente.
Quote from: Viktor Frankl
When we are no longer able to change a situation, we are challenged to change ourselves.
Quote from: Sindain
Its kinda silly to complain that a friendly NPC isn't a well designed boss fight.
Quote from: Eric Blank
How will I cheese now assholes?
Quote from: MrRoboto75
Always spaghetti, never forghetti

redwallzyl

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20929 on: June 19, 2018, 07:11:47 pm »

They are really not conservatives at that point but reactionaries. Which is a big problem. Liberals can get along with conservatives fine but reactionaries don't get along well with others.
Logged

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20930 on: June 19, 2018, 07:19:37 pm »

So today the USA pulled out of the Human Rights council and also it's national news that border patrol is taking children hostage. Is this... are we literally starting concentration camps?

The final straw appears to have been criticism of the current immigration crisis, however, they're using 'Israel bias' as an exuse.

@redwallzyl and nenjin: The left can be just as reactionary as the right. The pendulum of politics has swung hard to the right, correct? That pendulum is going to swing just as hard to the left due to the left reacting against the reactionaries. So, we're in for a hell of a rubberbanding around.

I don't know if it will, but it's not hard for me to imagine the right getting as much of a whiplash as the left did in 2016 come next Presidential election. Especially considering how parts of the left were trying to go even further left in 2016 with Sanders.

Yeah, that's been pretty much it the whole time. At this point conservative positions are the ones that piss off liberals the most. The only thing left there is trolling, and they're making it a matter of policy.

I wouldn't say all conservative positions, there are moderate conservatives that liberals are willing to work with, it's the reactionaries that are causing problems.

Oh yeah, I just remembered something, on the 'trigger the libs' mindset, guess who is behind the immigration stuff? Stephen 'trigger the libs' Miller. And that strategy is starting to backfire.
« Last Edit: June 19, 2018, 07:28:07 pm by smjjames »
Logged

nenjin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Inscrubtable Exhortations of the Soul
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20931 on: June 19, 2018, 07:34:31 pm »

The pendulum is going to have to first swing hard left just to bring us back to where we were before Trump. And maybe it's just, but it seems like it's just been picking up speed and swinging harder each direction pretty much since I started paying attention to politics. I'm not entirely sure I want to see what the extreme Left looks like, either.

Logged
Cautivo del Milagro seamos, Penitente.
Quote from: Viktor Frankl
When we are no longer able to change a situation, we are challenged to change ourselves.
Quote from: Sindain
Its kinda silly to complain that a friendly NPC isn't a well designed boss fight.
Quote from: Eric Blank
How will I cheese now assholes?
Quote from: MrRoboto75
Always spaghetti, never forghetti

redwallzyl

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20932 on: June 19, 2018, 07:39:57 pm »

The US has never ever been anywhere near hard left. Sanders is not even approaching anything far left. It's just he has been painted as such partly by enemies and partly by himself. He is a standard social democrat at best and a democratic socialist at absolute worst.
Logged

EnigmaticHat

  • Bay Watcher
  • I vibrate, I die, I vibrate again
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20933 on: June 19, 2018, 07:40:41 pm »

"Reactionary" is an old fashioned term that refers to a specific right leaning idealogy.  The idea being:

Liberals (want things to change) < Conservatives (want things to stay the same) > Reactionaries (want things to go back to how they were before)

I've mostly seen the word in a historical context, referring to people who want to go back to monarchies or agrarian lifestyles.  Modern Republican reactionaries are kinda odd in that they want to go back to a good old industrial time.  I'm sure Tolkien is spinning in his grave.
Logged
"T-take this non-euclidean geometry, h-humanity-baka. I m-made it, but not because I l-li-l-like you or anything! I just felt s-sorry for you, b-baka."
You misspelled seance.  Are possessing Draignean?  Are you actually a ghost in the shell? You have to tell us if you are, that's the rule

SalmonGod

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nyarrr
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20934 on: June 19, 2018, 07:49:19 pm »

They're just coming to terms with what has always been behind polite conversation. People on the other side of the spectrum don't just disagree with their views, they're repulsed by them. The same repulsion a conservative far right Christian feels about abortion and gay marriage is the same moral repulsion a liberal democrat on the left feels about wanting to make an entire religion illegal or dictating what you can do with your body or what rights you're allowed to have based on your sexual identity. What kept the Left and Right talking to each other pre-Trump was the fact the Right kept their actual opinions to themselves for the most part, while the Left would loudly denounce those beliefs to the air (while pointedly staring at people on the right.)

In some cases, yeah.  Like on the point of bigotry.  Yeah, there's revulsion there.  But there's a lot I don't feel like this interpretation lines up with.

Because a lot of the shit is just totally made up.  Like the "They hate our freedoms" bit.  Totally irrational nonsense.  Same with war on Christmas.  Eliminating prayer in school.  Or thinking that legality of abortion = literal hatred of babies.  The revulsion they're sensing on the other side of these conversations is most of the time not real.

"They hate our freedoms" is the most commonly expressed example of all of these, in my experience, and it's also the least comprehensible.  It doesn't even align with the dimensions of any existing real conversation for them to see through.


"Nah, fuck that. Your generation is fucked in the head! I'm done! You guys are fucked in the head."

*storms off*

"Cmon man, let's not leave it at that."

"No fuck that I'm done."

I encounter this a lot, too.  Have for a long time.  But this tends to be more about generation than political spectrum.  It shocks me sometimes.  I've had older people shake their heads and go "I'm glad I'm on my way out" in response to me just going through the motions of some totally neutral, mundane daily task that just happens to be on a computer.  Even something as simple as putting a pdf in a windows folder, instead of a paper document in a paper folder.  Several times among family and co-workers.  And it always catches me off guard and makes me seriously pause... but I've never figured out how to engage that when it happens.  I continue on about my day and just feel this dread and sorrow for them that I don't know what to do with.

And sometimes it comes out from less savory characters as "Your generation is fucked in the head".  Definitely heard that outside of political discussion.  Plenty of times.

That may not sound like the same thing as refusing to engage political discussion the way that guy did.  But I think it is the same.  That refusal to engage is, I think, because the world has just changed too much through their lifetimes.  They flee from the subject when engaged in earnest, especially in a well-meaning manner, because they can't elucidate why it's a bad thing.  It just feels wrong.  Alienating.  And they don't know what to do with that feeling other than lash out and regress.

I think "Your generation is fucked in the head" really means "The world has moved on from the one I understood, but I don't think what I understand is wrong.  If you can make sense of it, that makes my understanding wrong.  So you must be fucked in the head."  In other words, it's an emotional recoil from black & white thinkers who can't handle the idea that different understandings of the world can be correct at the same time, who have their understandings challenged by issues that are culturally associated with generational experiences.

Conservative politics are partially fueled by design to be an easy outlet for those feelings.  But responses like that are definitely not something only conservatives are guilty of.  Some of my co-workers who I've witnessed the same attitude from go to the Gay Pride festival in Indianapolis every year.
Logged
In the land of twilight, under the moon
We dance for the idiots
As the end will come so soon
In the land of twilight

Maybe people should love for the sake of loving, and not with all of these optimization conditions.

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20935 on: June 19, 2018, 07:50:32 pm »

The pendulum is going to have to first swing hard left just to bring us back to where we were before Trump. And maybe it's just, but it seems like it's just been picking up speed and swinging harder each direction pretty much since I started paying attention to politics. I'm not entirely sure I want to see what the extreme Left looks like, either.

It certainly feels that way to me too, with the pendulum swinging harder to the other side each time. In many ways, Obama is the opposite of Bush 43, so, what's the opposite of Trump? Probably so far left enough that it'd be accurately center-left or fully left wing in the European spectrum. That is how far I'm imagining it might swing. Might take another six years to happen, but when it does happen, it'll be a major whiplash.

This kind of extreme penduluming (is that even a word?) can't be healthy to the country in the long run.

The US has never ever been anywhere near hard left. Sanders is not even approaching anything far left. It's just he has been painted as such partly by enemies and partly by himself. He is a standard social democrat at best and a democratic socialist at absolute worst.

That's mainly due to the Cold War and the fact that hard left was 'the enemy' back then. However, that's 'the left' in the modern sense. It's possible that we have been there pre WWII according to the standards of left vs right of the moment of time you're looking at.

And yeah, I've heard that Sanders wouldn't even count as left by European standards, probably centrist at best.
Logged

Dunamisdeos

  • Bay Watcher
  • Duggin was the hero we needed.
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20936 on: June 19, 2018, 07:55:50 pm »

Trump has set a precedent that absolutely anything is justified in the pursuit of political victory.

I've been telling the far-right folks I know that this is going to result in the same kind of outright abuse of their side by way of precedent. They don't care. They were 100% fine with Trump banning travel then making specific exceptions to Christians with the full knowledge that the precedent it sets will apply to them in the future, because they got to feel like they won in the now.

::EDIT:: Everyone wants to hurt as many people as possible (of the approved variety of people, as decried by their political leader) without regard to consequence. If some kind of left-wing demagogue takes over after Trump we will see the same excesses pointed 180 in the other direction, and they'll just say Trump did it first.
« Last Edit: June 19, 2018, 07:57:55 pm by Dunamisdeos »
Logged
FACT I: Post note art is best art.
FACT II: Dunamisdeos is a forum-certified wordsmith.
FACT III: "All life begins with Post-it notes and ends with Post-it notes. This is the truth! This is my belief!...At least for now."
FACT IV: SPEECHO THE TRUSTWORM IS YOUR FRIEND or BEHOLD: THE FRUIT ENGINE 3.0

EnigmaticHat

  • Bay Watcher
  • I vibrate, I die, I vibrate again
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20937 on: June 19, 2018, 07:56:37 pm »

I've taken to calling Bernie a New New Deal Democrat.  He would have fit right into the FDR era.
Logged
"T-take this non-euclidean geometry, h-humanity-baka. I m-made it, but not because I l-li-l-like you or anything! I just felt s-sorry for you, b-baka."
You misspelled seance.  Are possessing Draignean?  Are you actually a ghost in the shell? You have to tell us if you are, that's the rule

SalmonGod

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nyarrr
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20938 on: June 19, 2018, 07:57:01 pm »

Pff... Obama was not even close to opposite of Bush.  The dude expanded on many of the things that the left criticized Bush for, such as government secrecy and surveillance.  Once upon a time, one of the top rallying cries against Bush was Patriot Act.
Logged
In the land of twilight, under the moon
We dance for the idiots
As the end will come so soon
In the land of twilight

Maybe people should love for the sake of loving, and not with all of these optimization conditions.

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: AmeriPol thread
« Reply #20939 on: June 19, 2018, 08:09:45 pm »

Trump has set a precedent that absolutely anything is justified in the pursuit of political victory.

I've been telling the far-right folks I know that this is going to result in the same kind of outright abuse of their side by way of precedent. They don't care. They were 100% fine with Trump banning travel then making specific exceptions to Christians with the full knowledge that the precedent it sets will apply to them in the future, because they got to feel like they won in the now.

::EDIT:: Everyone wants to hurt as many people as possible (of the approved variety of people, as decried by their political leader) without regard to consequence. If some kind of left-wing demagogue takes over after Trump we will see the same excesses pointed 180 in the other direction, and they'll just say Trump did it first.

Not only that, the Republicans in Congress have set the same precedent for everything they did. While not all of it is new, they've done things that will backfire on them because the Dems can call 'PRECEDENT!'. Remember the whole removal of the 60 votes for SCOTUS down to 51? The bitter irony is that the Dems can use that against them when they come into power.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 1394 1395 [1396] 1397 1398 ... 3513