And my only point for Teneb was his day activity >_<
EITHER of you three though :I because I can shift my vote to Teneb as per uncertainty.
Also please notice that BHK has an additional point to his stuff, at least that's what I assume because of the note of 'being able to act at a time away from my time'. Because a regular vigilante does NOT have this kind of choice--or at least, he has the choice of multishooting, because of the Annoying Parrots, but he could choose to act on N0? Nothing mentioning that kind of ability anywhere, and I'm only using the dead as cross-comparison.
Also sorry if I sounded mean .-. the thought just hit me that the activity is reasonable to be at this rate given how many are alive.
Noting however:
2 Third-parties [Roseheart's actions were...very unfriendly to Town though -_-]
So in a 7 player game, that's pretty much making it a 2/5, assuming nobody else is third parties.
Now out of us 6:
We've got 2 claiming Inspect/Cop, with FoU marking Teneb as different in ability. [FoU/Teneb] {
FoU/
Teneb; I don't see anything about 'action unaffected by actions resolving after it' though. Maybe people misinterpreted (...like myself too?
) that I targeted Teneb, hence moving his action to N0, thereby CLEARING him in my eyes from doubt because it really fixes up the things he said before I even claimed.
One Vigilante, who can seemingly shoot whenever, at least give or take a day. [BHK] {
here}
A Phoenix, who...resurrects others, so that goes against a technical LYLO and is good, but may tie with FoU being scum because a really solid claim is on both extremes of 'convincing' and 'utterly winning if a fakeclaim' [Caz] {Same page as the TDS link}
Me,
hopefully the only third party left alive [Tiruin]
And [TDS],
has claimed a roleblockerAlthough when you did mention no lynch, I'm also okay with that, but the reasoning may not help as much given the context of...the situation.
Oh.
I investigated Caz because of how much she supported Roseheart.
But...he was obviously a non-party at that point? :/
And moreso tied to TDS?
It is LYLO -.-
3 Town
2 Mafia
Technical LYLO.
My statement that it's MYLO assumes that you're scum.
Yes but...that's the point. It may help a lot more to include everything I've done D2 to add into it. Like my whole claim there, and how it matches with Teneb being scum too.
And me also mentioning the layout of the game as-is, because you'll have to go after what I've written (or dismiss it entirely, that's also possible and I think what you're assuming in turn?)
Why? And seriously, why didn't you just save your AP? You could have waited until the massclaim now and modified actions based on what people claimed to cause a paradox... instead you just act at random?
WHY would anyone massclaim when most of my actions caused the thing happening today
I could've waited...OR, given the information at N1, and the opportunity at N0, I could've acted and caused a paradox by making players' actions not applicable. That means also happening before people can even act, which means ALSO not killing them >_<
Also, that's quite a gamble. You ruined your chance of winning by spending all your AP at once. Maybe that could have worked, but it was a ridiculous gamble.
That's...basically my point???
Because it's either I win and get out, or I stay back. It's best at N0 and that's all I'm saying on this matter, however
Basically I'm saying you're scum because your vote happened to align with Teneb's vote, and because you didn't play to your claimed wincon all that well when there's obvious better choices for how to do so. And I've already stated why I think Teneb is scum.
Err...the orange bit doesn't make me scum because I apparently voted you; I've reasons why I picked you out, and those reasons aren't being acknowledged whatsoever (just because you dislike Teneb and go versus his claim of a cop, doesn't mean I am with him just because I voted you. Read it this way--in my perspective, his is more believable, because a fakeclaim from scum targets literally ANYONE and can mostly be right unless you hit a third-party. He picked a non-action,
especially before me mentioning my actions)
because you didn't play to your claimed wincon all that well when there's obvious better choices for how to do so.
Um ._.
Your predictions don't make 'my play not going with my wincon'.
It's like assuming the present, as if it is the past, when it isn't, because I've affected seemingly a few people.
And mostly, the discussion veers away from the SCUMKILL which has targeted one of the two dead TOWNIES.
Who is pretty much JUICEBOX.