Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Are adventurers still asexual in .43.04 and .43.05?  (Read 2052 times)

Deinos

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Are adventurers still asexual in .43.04 and .43.05?
« on: July 29, 2016, 04:31:41 am »
Are maximally lustful, maximally romantic, maximally friends and family oriented adventurers whose goal in life is to start a family still asexual?
Logged

Vorox

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Are adventurers still asexual in .43.04 and .43.05?
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2016, 05:35:30 pm »
don't know, but you can just use the dfhack 'fix-ster fert' command if you really care
Logged
Vorox likes gremlins for their tears.

Quietust

  • Bay Watcher
  • Does not suffer fools gladly
    • View Profile
    • QMT Productions
Re: Are adventurers still asexual in .43.04 and .43.05?
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2016, 05:53:40 pm »
Quote from: Vorox on July 31, 2016, 05:35:30 pm
don't know, but you can just use the dfhack 'fix-ster fert' command if you really care
DFHack isn't yet available for version 0.43.04 or later - since Toady changed compilers (and added 64-bit support), there's a whole lot of stuff that needs to be updated.
Logged
P.S. If you don't get this note, let me know and I'll write you another.
Quote from: Lord Dakoth on September 17, 2009, 10:47:58 pm
It's amazing how dwarves can make a stack of bones completely waterproof and magmaproof.
Quote from: Neruz on September 18, 2009, 06:58:26 am
It's amazing how they can make an entire floodgate out of the bones of 2 cats.

Untrustedlife

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • My Website
Re: Are adventurers still asexual in .43.04 and .43.05?
« Reply #3 on: May 04, 2017, 03:00:40 pm »
Im aware this is a necropost. BUt any word on this?
Logged
I am an indie game dev!
My Roguelike! With randomly generated creatures Roguelegends: Dark Realms
My Turn Based Strategy game! Which you can buy on steam now!DR4X
My website untrustedlife.com

PatrikLundell

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Are adventurers still asexual in .43.04 and .43.05?
« Reply #4 on: May 04, 2017, 04:23:19 pm »
All indications are that adventurers remain sexually undetermined and that nothing has changed regarding that in the last two releases. DFHack is now able to change this again, although it's still beta.
Logged

Shonai_Dweller

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Are adventurers still asexual in .43.04 and .43.05?
« Reply #5 on: May 04, 2017, 09:44:07 pm »
Yes, they are. I asked in Fotf (I assume that the reply I got from dfhack savvy folk was correct, as Toady skipped that question).
Logged

Foxite

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Are adventurers still asexual in .43.04 and .43.05?
« Reply #6 on: May 06, 2017, 07:36:12 am »
DFHack is now in beta, which means it should not have any game-destroying death-and-destruction bugs, but no promises.

You could try, but always make backups.
Logged
Quote from: Melting Sky on December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 pm
The best way to demonstrate it to him is take a save of 40 year old fortress with 150 dwarves in it on a good sized embark with a volcano that just breached the circus and install it on his gaming rig and watch it bring his rig to its knees.

Hesperid

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Are adventurers still asexual in .43.04 and .43.05?
« Reply #7 on: June 19, 2017, 11:59:47 am »
Adventurers don't get married or have children in 0.43.05 unless you swap out the "indeterminate" sexuality flag for either marry_male or marry_female.
Logged

Shonai_Dweller

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Are adventurers still asexual in .43.04 and .43.05?
« Reply #8 on: June 19, 2017, 04:28:47 pm »
Does that actually work? Has anyone seen retired adventurers marry, have kids, etc in worldgen?
I mentioned this in another thread and someone responded that they'd tried it and it didn't work for them.
Logged

Hesperid

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Are adventurers still asexual in .43.04 and .43.05?
« Reply #9 on: June 20, 2017, 04:12:18 am »
My two adventurers have a child who's now two years old, the child isn't playable as an adventurer however. Also the adventurers were fortress citizens for a long period (I retired them at a fort, unretired the fort, after some time they both applied for citizen status).

edit:

Actually this probably isn't what you're asking because it didn't happen in the "active world" background system.
Logged