Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 25

Author Topic: Is playing dwarf fortress ethical?  (Read 48094 times)

Eschar

  • Bay Watcher
  • hello
    • View Profile
Re: Is playing dwarf fortress ethical?
« Reply #225 on: May 19, 2018, 02:39:37 pm »

Here's a slightly different question: given the uneasiness the OP appears to harbor considering the violent things we do in DF, would playing DF be more or less ethical than Doom?
« Last Edit: May 19, 2018, 04:47:49 pm by Eschar »
Logged

PlumpHelmetMan

  • Bay Watcher
  • Try me with sauce...
    • View Profile
Re: Is playing dwarf fortress ethical?
« Reply #226 on: May 19, 2018, 04:08:19 pm »

Neither is any more or less ethical than the other. They're both computer games with the "violent activities" being just the shifting around of numbers.
« Last Edit: May 19, 2018, 04:19:08 pm by PlumpHelmetMan »
Logged
It's actually pretty terrifying to think about having all of your fat melt off into grease because you started sweating too much.

Eschar

  • Bay Watcher
  • hello
    • View Profile
Re: Is playing dwarf fortress ethical?
« Reply #227 on: May 19, 2018, 04:37:02 pm »

Neither is any more or less ethical than the other. They're both computer games with the "violent activities" being just the shifting around of numbers.

That's about the games themselves, as software, rather than playing the games.
...ah, I see I forgot to specify that in my post. I apologize.
« Last Edit: May 19, 2018, 04:47:34 pm by Eschar »
Logged

Bumber

  • Bay Watcher
  • REMOVE KOBOLD
    • View Profile
Re: Is playing dwarf fortress ethical?
« Reply #228 on: May 19, 2018, 07:29:52 pm »

Is reviving dead threads ethical?
Logged
Reading his name would trigger it. Thinking of him would trigger it. No other circumstances would trigger it- it was strictly related to the concept of Bill Clinton entering the conscious mind.

THE xTROLL FUR SOCKx RUSE WAS A........... DISTACTION        the carp HAVE the wagon

A wizard has turned you into a wagon. This was inevitable (Y/y)?

KittyTac

  • Bay Watcher
  • Impending Catsplosion. [PREFSTRING:aloofness]
    • View Profile
Re: Is playing dwarf fortress ethical?
« Reply #229 on: May 20, 2018, 12:09:06 am »

Should I ask Toady to lock this thread so it dies forever?
Logged
Don't trust this toaster that much, it could be a villain in disguise.
Mostly phone-posting, sorry for any typos or autocorrect hijinks.

Egan_BW

  • Bay Watcher
  • Perhaps I'll
    • View Profile
Re: Is playing dwarf fortress ethical?
« Reply #230 on: May 20, 2018, 12:13:31 am »

That is not dead which may eternal lie.
Logged
Down at the bottom of the ocean. Beneath tons of brine which would crush you down. Not into broken and splintered flesh, but into thin soup. Into just more of the sea water. Where things live that aren't so different from you, but you will never live to touch them and they will never live to touch you.

Pvt. Pirate

  • Bay Watcher
  • Dabbling Linux User
    • View Profile
Re: Is playing dwarf fortress ethical?
« Reply #231 on: May 20, 2018, 01:34:40 am »

Is reviving dead threads ethical?
erm, well it's not...
Should I ask Toady to lock this thread so it dies forever?
Please do so!
Logged
"dwarves are by definition alcohol powered parasitic beards, which will cling to small caveadapt humanoids." (Chaia)

Rolan7

  • Bay Watcher
  • [GUE'VESA][BONECARN]
    • View Profile
Re: Is playing dwarf fortress ethical?
« Reply #232 on: May 20, 2018, 08:42:33 am »

Reviving dead threads is ethical as long as the OP is still around, and people want to discuss the topic :P
OP can lock the topic when they come back (they were active on the 17th).  I'm curious what they think about this.
Logged
She/they
No justice: no peace.
Quote from: Fallen London, one Unthinkable Hope
This one didn't want to be who they was. On the Surface – it was a dull, unconsidered sadness. But everything changed. Which implied everything could change.

KittyTac

  • Bay Watcher
  • Impending Catsplosion. [PREFSTRING:aloofness]
    • View Profile
Re: Is playing dwarf fortress ethical?
« Reply #233 on: May 20, 2018, 09:41:14 am »

I messaged Toady already. Let's hope this deservedly dies forever.
Logged
Don't trust this toaster that much, it could be a villain in disguise.
Mostly phone-posting, sorry for any typos or autocorrect hijinks.

Pvt. Pirate

  • Bay Watcher
  • Dabbling Linux User
    • View Profile
Re: Is playing dwarf fortress ethical?
« Reply #234 on: May 20, 2018, 11:11:25 am »

I messaged Toady already. Let's hope this deservedly dies forever.
*starts forging a +Platin Mace+ for Toady to kill the thread*
Logged
"dwarves are by definition alcohol powered parasitic beards, which will cling to small caveadapt humanoids." (Chaia)

bloop_bleep

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Is playing dwarf fortress ethical?
« Reply #235 on: May 20, 2018, 02:34:23 pm »

*starts forging a +Platin Mace+ for Toady to kill the thread*
Fool! The Toad's Mighty Banhammer is far stronger than any which can be forged by mere mortals.
Logged
Quote from: KittyTac
The closest thing Bay12 has to a flamewar is an argument over philosophy that slowly transitioned to an argument about quantum mechanics.
Quote from: thefriendlyhacker
The trick is to only make predictions semi-seriously.  That way, I don't have a 98% failure rate. I have a 98% sarcasm rate.

Pvt. Pirate

  • Bay Watcher
  • Dabbling Linux User
    • View Profile
Re: Is playing dwarf fortress ethical?
« Reply #236 on: May 21, 2018, 03:00:09 am »

*starts forging a +Platin Mace+ for Toady to kill the thread*
Fool! The Toad's Mighty Banhammer is far stronger than any which can be forged by mere mortals.
so my strange mood was futile?! *goes stark raging mad*
Logged
"dwarves are by definition alcohol powered parasitic beards, which will cling to small caveadapt humanoids." (Chaia)

Untrustedlife

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • My Website
Re: Is playing dwarf fortress ethical?
« Reply #237 on: May 21, 2018, 01:32:07 pm »

About bacteria being as intelligent as dwarf fortress dwarves.
They are not.
Bacteria move via something called "run and tumble" which is a ridiculously simple algorithm to write in code. Dwarves are smarter then bacteria because they can pathfind, bacteria actually cant, and  because for example they track memories while a bacteria doesn't, even at that simplistic a level, however a dwarf is in NO WAY as intelligent or complex as the simplest multcellular organism, which required a huge supercomputer with 400 computers to simulate the entire nervous system of (and they pulled it off, look it up, but still 400 computers)

And before you say :
"false bacteria are complex as heck"
complexity ~= intelligence.And while bacteria may be more complex then dwarves, they are not nearly as intelligent as dwarves.

But saying dwarves in dwarf fortress are less intelligent then bacteria is absolute nonsense.

-Software Developer here, also one of the guys programming thrive (game about literally playing as a single celled organism and yes, single celled organisms are impressively complex and interesting and i love this stuff)

And no, bacteria dont even think, they are just a bag made up of a cell wall, full of cytoplasm, dna, and proteins that swims towards higher concentrations of chemicals they need.


Also, about dwarf fortress:
It used to be that thoughts were just moving one number around, but now each event that happens to a dwarf moves several numbers around, each number corresponding to a specific emotion, and each can cause things to change in the dwarves state (are they tantruming, are they sulking, do tehy want to pray etc. )  which is more like a really-really basic neural network then just "adding a single number and subtracting a single number" (and as i said it s a VERY basic thing that i s similar to a neural network but it is not a neural network, a neural network is obviously more complex) )

Also, neurons, really are in fact just a bunch of numbers that flip when it hits a certain point, you can read more about neural networks and artificial neurons here:
http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~bolo/shipyard/neural/local.html

You can read about actual neurons here:
https://www.psychologynoteshq.com/neurons-what-are-they-and-how-do-they-work/

You can read about the "Run and tumble' algorithm here:
It is closer to a random walk then any thing that could be considered smart.
http://www.mit.edu/~kardar/teaching/projects/chemotaxis(AndreaSchmidt)/finding_food.htm

Anyway, done with my rant.

Also,
This argument itself may become important eventually as AI in video games gets more complex (its an argument similar to the one where: is it ethical to kill holodeck characters if we had a holodeck, if they were handled by an AI even close to human level in terms of intelligence) Now is not the time for this kind of argument we really arn't there yet, we have nothing that close to being actually "conscious" (even though humans brains are just a bunch of neurons and chemicals interacting with each other and i personally do not believe "consciousness" is something on its own but a sum of neurons+chemicals, (there is no "supernatural consciousness" its a bollocks unscientific idea) .

But, lets say we did, ill use the c-elegans simulation as an example (remember the 400 computers from earlier, yeah that one) i believe it is unethical to torture the simulated c-elegans because they were fully simulating all its processes, including its nervous system, and in that case i believe it deserves the rights of any other c-elegans, which aren't many. If we expanded this to say, the mind of a dwarf in a theoretical future where we can afford that kind of computer power, it would also be unethical to torture that dwarf.
But i'm done now.

C elegans:
http://airesearch.com/ai-blog/is-this-c-elegans-worm-simulation-alive/


Note: It may have been less then 400 computers actually, (40 or 20 instead maybe the 400 may have been a different simulation) but my point still stands, if someone can get that data i would appreciate it as i dont want to misinform people but if it was less computers it would simply strengthen my argument :)
« Last Edit: May 21, 2018, 02:28:55 pm by Untrustedlife »
Logged
I am an indie game dev!
My Roguelike! With randomly generated creatures Roguelegends: Dark Realms
My Turn Based Strategy game! Which you can buy on steam now!DR4X
My website untrustedlife.com

Dozebôm Lolumzalěs

  • Bay Watcher
  • what even is truth
    • View Profile
    • test
Re: Is playing dwarf fortress ethical?
« Reply #238 on: May 21, 2018, 01:47:10 pm »

This quote-replying to 100 individual sentences in another person's post makes me feel like I'm 13 again and the Internet is all fresh and new.
By the way, I think that the cause of this tendency is that internet conversations can be more non-linear/non-sequential. There's still a back-and-forth element, but because you can send a large amount of information in one go, you can carry out multiple adjacent discussions in one post. It's sort of like exploring a tree - verbal discussions have to travel up one branch, then go back down perhaps, then up another. Internet discussions can take the cross-section of the tree and go upward.

That might not be a good thing, though, since verbal discussions don't actually tend to resemble internet discussions except that [123] [456] looks like [1][4][2][5][3][6]. In practice, productive discussions tend to pull branches together and talk more generally, only going into specifics when necessary. This means that both participants have a constantly-updated bigger picture. Without verbal constraints, internet discussions don't have the need to bundle branches, and so they are more likely to lose sight of the bigger picture. (Not that this doesn't happen in verbal discussions anyway, but it's less common when you can only talk about one bundle at a time and you have many subtopics to discuss.)
Logged
Quote from: King James Programming
...Simplification leaves us with the black extra-cosmic gulfs it throws open before our frenzied eyes...
Quote from: Salvané Descocrates
The only difference between me and a fool is that I know that I know only that I think, therefore I am.
Sigtext!

PlumpHelmetMan

  • Bay Watcher
  • Try me with sauce...
    • View Profile
Re: Is playing dwarf fortress ethical?
« Reply #239 on: May 21, 2018, 02:09:34 pm »

Oh for the love of Armok, can we PLEASE just let this thread rot?
Logged
It's actually pretty terrifying to think about having all of your fat melt off into grease because you started sweating too much.
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 25