Galactic Race
General Play LoopThese rules are adapted from a couple different arms race games, with enough new twists that they're worth reading again even if you've played all the arms race games.
This arms race plays out over 3 phases: The design and project maintenance phase, the revision phase, and the production, deployment and tactics phase. In the absence of other modifiers, each team gains 5 dice to use at the start of every year. Every year, each team will cycle through the three phases in order, spending dice and resources to capture worlds and advance their cause.
At the start of each year designs and project maintenance is handled. Members of each team may propose designs. Everyone is allowed to vote for a design. During this same time, players of each team propose resource allocation plans for various pre-existing projects. These are voted on in the same way as designs. You can vote for any number of projects so long as there are enough dice for everything you're voting for to be done simultaneously. You cannot vote for the same design or spending plan more than once. It is not possible to directly vote against a design, but it is possible to vote for meta-goals such as 'no design' or 'only 1 design'. The design (if any) with the most votes gets rendered into a new project and the progress for the funded existing projects moves ahead at the end of this stage. Any created prototypes or finished projects are also described at the end of this stage.
After designs and projects have been worked out, then the players move on to revisions. Revision are cheap, but best suited to address problems with improvements to existing desings. For example, if you finished a ship based beam laser last round, you can try a revision to make a pulsed version or to fix an overheating issue. However, one could not immediately turn around and revise infantry laser weapons from a ship based beam laser. Do not make the mistake of thinking that smaller is less complex. Revisions to improve a technology beyond the original design will face diminishing returns quickly, but correcting bugs in the original design does not count against that soft limit.
Any dice not spent on revisions/designs/projects are saved back for the next round. Each team can bank a total of 5 dice, giving them a maximum of 10 dice to spend at any one time.
After revisions comes the production, deployment, and tactics phase. During deployment you can set and modify standing movement orders to your ships, sending them to various locations to do ship things. A ship's range is determined by its bore drive, but its movement will be halted by enemy activity. Ships can be ordered to only engage under certain conditions, but Captains may have imperfect information depending on sensors and a variety of other factors. In the event of engagement, ships will do their best to carry out whatever tactic they have assigned. For soldiers on the ground, orders are of three major flavors: Advance, hold the line, and retreat. Advance tactics attempt to take ground, and will inflict maximum casualties for both attacker and defender. Holding the line is better to keep from losing ground against a stronger attack force, but will never gain territory and will inflict fewer casualties than an offense. Retreating voluntarily gives up ground, attempting to spare lives and equipment for the defenders when possible. The last part, construction orders, is about allocating production points and/or resources to actually build new weapons/ships/regiments/infrastructure. Each player gets a single vote for each of these three types of commands, with the same rules as voting for revisions and designs applying.
Once that's finished, I put out the battle report into the main thread, and the turn cycles back around to the main phase. Certain actions, such as fleet movements, colonization and construction, will not be posted into the main thread, and will remain localized to each Empire's thread.
Combat in SpaceCombat in space will not be realistic. Realistic space combat is... a pain. If you've played SoTS or Starsector, that's more the feel I'm aiming for. If you haven't, think more of Star Trek naval combat, though with the distances being a bit longer. When deploying a fleet, you can freely specify the tactics used by the ships involved. Such tactics can be written up at any time, and you should make every effort for them to be concise and clear in their instruction. If this freeform method proves ineffective, we'll move to tactics being integrated directly as designs and revisions.
Unless given instruction otherwise, combat vessels will attempt to engage until they face a clear defeat, at which point they'll prime for an emergency Bore Jump and attempt to bug out. This will, however, damage the systems of the surviving vessels, and potentially cause cascading failures and even the destruction damaged ships. Non-Combat vessels, massively outclassed combat vessels, or vessels ordered not to engage, will attempt to create distance at sublight speed before making an FTL jump when forced into a combat encounter.
After a battle, if there are any ships capable of towing, derelicts from destroyed vessels can be hauled back by whichever side gained area control. Such derelicts can be scrapped for resources and a look at the operational parameters of surviving equipment. With base salvage technology, resource yields for such salvage will not exceed 10% of its original value.
Planetary CombatPlanetary combat is split into two parts, planetary bombardment and landings.
Planetary bombardment serves two purposes. First, it can allow attackers to 'soften up' strategic ground targets in order for later landing forces to have an easier time actually invading. Second, it can be used to inflict quick economic damage on an adversary without actually needing to spend the resources on a full-on invasion fleet of transports. At start, you have two flavors of bombardment: soft target bombardment and hard target bombardment. Hard target bombardment attempts to hit military installations and defensive infrastructure, reducing their efficacy, and potentially reducing the army value of a planet. If there are no defensive armies and a planet's defense grid is destroyed, the resistance to capture the world will be minimal- assuming that the other nation hasn't done hijinx to the contrary.
While that sounds nice, Hard targets, true to their name, are usually hardened against bombardment. In some cases you may find yourself in a position where you don't have time, resources, or firepower to start hammering down defenses so you can send in an invasion force. Still, if you can manage to get a fleet around an enemy planet, you want to try and deal damage. That's where soft-target bombardment is helpful. True to its name, it attempts to hit the soft targets of your opponent's economic infrastructure- farms, research labs, mines, etc. Destroying these not only reduces the amount of resources they get per turn, but forces them to spend money rebuilding. Of course, in an ideal world you'd like to capture a planet with most of the soft targets intact so you don't have to rebuild them yourself (see Planets and Planetary infrastructure), but war doesn't always allow for ideal worlds.
You may be able to spend designs and revisions to improve the efficacy of or prioritize certain targets with orbital bombardment.
Planetary landings require transports filled with troops. Landing regiments then face pushback against defense forces, directly engaging ground forces in a bid to conquer strategic positions. Importantly, basic ground troops do not inflict damage to infrastructure. They target enemy troops and attempt to capture strategic areas to control the planet, and thus any surviving infrastructure is turned over to attackers. Ground attacks do not utilize tactics. Regiments of troops are assumed to include a mix of infantry and transports. However, more advanced or specialized units, such has high-power mecha, artillery cannons, elite psychic infantry, air support, or unspeakable eldritch horrors the size of small mountains, may be manufactured and added as attachments to basic regiments. Basically, if it's expensive to build/train, it'll be its own special attachment, not part of a standard invasion regiment.
If the attackers are doing well against the defenders, they'll begin to gain dominion over the planet. Dominion is represented as x/10, and represents how close you are to being able to control the important parts of the planet. 10/10 Dominion doesn't necessarily mean that you own and actively patrol every inch of territory, it just means that you're free to rain fire and death on anyone who wants to question whether you own any particular piece of territory. Depending on how well matched opposing forces are, dominion will be gained/lost at a rate of 1-4 per turn. A gain of 1 point of dominion indicates that any edge over the enemy is a slim one that could be turned aside easily, and may be wholly dependent on the fickle whim of fate. If forces are evenly matched, a coin will be flipped to see which side gains 1 dominion. A gain of 2 dominion indicates that there is a definite advantage over the enemy, but that the enemy is still able to put up a strong resistance, or that the advantage cannot be easily leveraged to control territory. A gain of 3 dominion indicates clear advantage over the enemy, where the majority of encounters end in retreat and the enemy is only able to mount a significant resistance at critical points. A gain of 4 dominion indicates that the enemy is being routed in every engagement, and that attacking forces have only to find their enemy to destroy them.
It should be noted that while certain special units, such as a massive abomination or a temporally unstable supersoldier may be able to devastate armies on their own, there's nothing like thousands of boots to actually take ground and root out the enemy.
Definitions and Resources
Dice in this arms race will have a result from 1 to 6, but will have a bell-shaped instead of a uniform distribution. Behind the scenes, this is accomplished by rolling 1d4+2d2-2. For designs, efficacy and cost are rolled separately. Revisions merely work on a single roll, but use the same distribution. What follows is a rough breakdown of the different rolls for prototypes.
Result 1: [6.25% Chance] Design are known for their SNAFU operation (if any), severe bugs run wild, or costs are through the roof.
Result 2: [18.75% Chance] Design function well below expected parameters, but kinda work. There is at least one severe bug, and likely a couple little ones. Costs are much higher than expected.
Result 3: [25% Chance] Design functions, perhaps with room for improvement. One severe or multiple minor bugs. Costs are a bit higher would be desired.
Result 4: [25% Chance] Design functions, meeting or slightly exceeding expections. No severe bugs, at least one minor bug. Costs are within expected parameters.
Result 5: [18.75% Chance] Design works very well, exceeding expected parameters. No more than a single minor bug, if any. Costs are considerably lower than expected.
Result 6: [6.25% Chance] Design works incredibly well, with some kind of added benefit. No bugs to report. Costs are trivial.
These results are generally independent of the difficulty of the project, which is reflected in the time it takes to actually complete a project (see Designs and Projects, below), and bonuses or penalties will usually only be applied as credits warrant.
Designs, Projects, and Revisions
Designs are the bread and butter of any arms race and require a minimum of three dice to start. Designs can be basically anything; the theoretical foundations of a groundbreaking discovery, a brand new main battle tank, a new resource extraction structure, or a sweeping social reform.
In this arms race, chosen designs immediately result in a prototype model that accurately depicts what the finished product will be like. This prototype will have only one roll associated with it, the efficacy. Efficacy is a general determiner of how well the finished project measures up to the design goals, which makes having clear and well defined design goals essential. Want something cheap? Make its design inexpensive. Want something better than everything else? Spare no expense in its materials. Good rolls can help and bad rolls can harm, but the focus is on your write-up.
However, you will not immediately be able to manufacture this new technology at a grand scale until you've completed the requisite research. This requisite research is referred to as the Project, and is a general reflection of how much time and expense needs to be invested before your empire is able to make a particular piece of technology viable for widespread deployment. When a project reaches 50% completion it reaches the prototype stage and a couple things can happen depending on the type of project. For projects that cannot be 'manufactured' (their end product has no unit cost), reaching prototype may give access to a reduced form of the technology or may grant a limited improvement in another area. For projects that do have a manufacturable end product, the team gains the ability to construct prototypes for twice the cost of the finished technology, and this cost scales downwards as additional progress is made. For instance, if the progress cost of a project is 20, then prototypes will cost 200% at progress 10, 150% at progress 15 110% at progress 19.
Every project rolls dice for time, progress, and cost when it is initiated. Time modifies a projects duration; in general, a project with a 1 in time will complete in half the time as the same project with a 6 in time. That being said, a project won't have a progress requirement lower than 3, and generally won't go too much higher than 35. The progress roll determines how much progress the engineers can make in a turn without direct intervention; a 1 generates only 1 unit of progress per turn, a 2 or 3 provides two units of progress, a four or a five provides three units of progress, and a six provides 4 units of progress per turn. The Cost roll is a similar multiplier for the material costs of the research performed, a low cost roll may have high costs and strongly restrict what resources you can use to pay for a project, while a good roll reduces overall costs and provides more flexible methods of payment.
A project header for an ambitious new ship generator looks something like this,
Hastur ξ-Phase Generator: 18/32 [2] | 100 Metal + 150 Transplutonic + 40 Synthetic | Rushed 1 times | 300 metal, 450 transplutonic, 120 Synthetic, and 6 dice invested
Name, followed by current progress/total needed with the amount guaranteed per turn in brackets, then how much each die of progress costs, the number of times the project has been rushed, and the total resources that have been currently invested.
Every round, during the design phase, a team can elect to spend any number of their dice on progressing projects. For each die they spend on a project, they have to pay that project's resource cost. So if you elect to spend 2 die on the above, you have to spend 200 metal, 300 transplutonic, and 80 synthetic. For every die you spend resources on, you can also elect to rush the project. This gives you an extra die that adds to project progress normally, but has a 33% chance to add a bug of random severity to the project or worsen an existing bug. It's not as bad as getting a -1 on your efficacy roll, but it can add up.
A project can be canceled at any time, and its resources re-allocated. When a project is canceled, the team gets 50% of the invested resources back at the end of the next turn, and a random number of dice back between 1 and the total number of dice invested, including the initial 3 dice used to start the project.
Revisions
Revisions are as standard in Arms Race games. They cost only one die, but they provide limited returns. Importantly, revisions are best used as improvements and modifications to existing technology and/or tactics. If you find yourself wondering whether something should be a revision or a new design, ask yourself whether it uses the same frame, and whether the addition is a technology by itself.
However, sufficiently minor new technology or preliminary scientific work can be done with revisions. Some situations are tricky, and if you overreach you might get a crappy version of what you wanted and a none-too-subtle hint that you should spend a design somewhere. I might feel nice enough to clarify if you ask about a particular situation (particularly in the early game), but don't count on that.
A special use of revisions is the creation of production patterns, which enable fully outfitted regiments or completed ships to be built from production points instead of raw resources. Importantly, infrastructure projects cannot have production patterns made, and cannot be bought from production points.
Shipbuilding Essentials
While your starting tech will be freeform, there's a few mechanical details in common with all ships. All ships are designed as hulls, with three key feature shared across all designs: the number of hardpoints, the mission capacity, and the ship class. Hardpoints determine the max number (and max size) of the guns you can stack on, mission capacity is for every other component you want to shove into the ship, and ship class determines how much command cost a vessel requires. One important extra feature that all ships should have, but may not be included intrinsically, is at least one generator.
Hardpoints are places to permanently mount guns/missiles/etc to ships. While you might later be able to come up with disposable missile systems and similar temporary augments, hardpoints are the currency of a ship's primary weapons. Hardpoints are divided, generally, into small, medium, and large mounts. Though one can later imagine a need for specialized classifications for Torpedo bays, fixed beam assemblies, and similar devices, their exact mounting type will be decided on creation. Most weapons that can be mounted to a small can be double mounted to a medium, or triple mounted to a large, a process which multiplies all the costs of the weapon, but also enables it to scale when needed. This process can also be used to double mount a medium weapon into a large slot. However, this process is not optimal, since a medium mount can house an optimized weapon three times the size of a small mount, and a large mount can house an optimized mount three times the size of a medium mount.
Mission capacity is how much space inside the ship there is for ammunition storage, shield generators, Bore spools, ritual chambers, internal organs, crew, etc. Most everything that you'd like to stick inside a ship requires a certain amount of dedicated space. Every weapon and subsystem you have requires space, and some space is spoken for from the outset. In general, a ship absolutely needs to reserve space for three things: Its weapons, its generator, and its engines and FTL system. Space beyond that can go into frills, spinning rims, and the tech that turns a ship into something more advanced than an FTL-capable cardboard box in space.
A vessel's class determines how well command vessels can keep track of and utilize it in combat, as reflected by a command cost (See the Fleet Cap definition below). This arms race breaks things into 7 big classes of ship, where each class of ship is about three times larger than the class before it. In order of size and command cost, the classes are Corvette (1), Frigate (3), Destroyer (6), Cruiser (12), Battleship (24), Dreadnought (48), and Leviathan (96). If you're wondering what class a ship will be when you design, just ask me and I'll take a look. In general, corvettes are all small mount, a frigate might mount a couple medium mounts, a destroyer might mount a single large weapon, a cruiser operates a good mix of mounts with multiple larges, a battleship pushes the envelope towards an all large gun layout, a dreadnought can mount massive cannons with ease with room to spare for systems, and a Leviathan does whatever the fuck you want.
A ship's generator could be a psionic savant, the beating heart that pumps blood through a bioship, or a nuclear fission reactor, but -whatever the form- its purpose is to run power to every system on board. In addition to the mission capacity of a ship, you'll be fighting against the energy rating of a ship's generator. A ship can't use more energy at any one time than the generator produces, although captains will intelligently deactivate non-essential or irrelevant systems depending on the circumstance. For instance, a cloaked ship whose cloak proves ineffective against enemy sensors, or that can't fight and cloak at the same time, will deactivate that system in order to turn on other systems- such as weapons, shields, and engines. Likewise, if a ship can't power its FTL and guns at the same time, but is engaged in combat, it will power down FTL to fight back unless it's actively attempting to retreat or told to do otherwise by its tactics.
The Fleet Cap: Each fleet has a cap, determined by its command vessel. This rating is an abstraction of a commander's skill, the suite of tools available on the command ship, the obedience of subordinate officers, the ease of relaying commands, etc. Each vessel has 'command cost', which represents how easily it can be accounted for and manipulated by a commanding officer. When in combat, a fleet can only actively field a total number of ships whose sum total of command cost does not exceed the fleet's cap. Any vessels beyond that will be kept in reserves to replace losses. If there is no command vessel, the fleet cap is 15. You may deploy any vessel alone, even if its command cost exceeds 15. Command vessels will generally be weaker than their peers, owing to their need to house more advanced computational and broadcast systems than their peers. However, one does not necessarily need to create a special hull for them, and can instead designate a plug and play command suite which instead merely requires power and mission space.
Deploying multiple command vessels at the same time does not increase the fleet cap, although any command vessels in reserves will automatically be pulled to the front if the primary command vessel is disabled or otherwise rendered unable to command. Command vessels will count against their own fleet capacity.
Landing Force Essentials
Each ground regiment is a fighting force of infantry, assumed to have internal logistical support and some light transport capability. Everything else that regiment needs must be provided through attachments- secondary buys that improves the options available to a regiment. Armor support, naval ships, artillery, advanced weapons- all of these are provided through the miracle of attachments.
Each attachment is a separate budget item, and is generally tightly focused. Designing a new type of heavy tank or monstrous xenomorph is likely to generate something analogous to a heavy armor attachment. An advanced weapons package with technology much more powerful and expensive than can be produced for the rank and file is likely an elite troop attachment. In general, augments of the same type do not stack up- but the most ideal type for the situation will be used. For instance, if a division is given three different air superiority attachments, they'll use the best mix of of fighters to defend themselves, but still won't be as strong as three separate divisions each with one of the three air superiority attachments.
That said, it is possible to integrate some things directly into a regiment itself, and one can always create new types of regiments. Machine armies, hordes of dimensional horrors, xenomorph scourges, if they would make up the bulk of a fighting force, you can directly make regiments from them instead. In the same way, you can still try to make upgrades to the base equipment of a regiment- though this may result in increasing its cost.
Getting a regiment to a planet requires a transport of some variety. Considering that a regiment consists of several thousand individuals, transport ships are generally of decent size, and you cannot just pack troops onto a ship that doesn't have space set aside for them. Unloading marines from a 'hot' area ends a transport's turn, as does loading troops from a 'hot' area. Be careful with this, as it makes transports quite vulnerable. Transports can load and unload freely from safe worlds.
Resources: Instead of certain bovine systems, we run off TOMES, Transplutonics, Organics, Metals, Energetics, and Synthetics. These are used to pay for various research projects, and can be used to pay for ships and equipment beyond production limits.
Transplutonics: Tranplutonics are refined and exotic heavy elements, of great variety and use in industrial and scientific application. Often key components of high-energy systems.
Organics: A wide category of carbon based molecules, used in biotech, polymers, solvents, and a great variety of other applications.
Metals: Copper, iron, tungsten, whole nine yards. Most basic metallic elements are covered under the domain of 'metals'.
Energetics: Useful light elements and their respective molecules, usually desiring to be in either a more gaseous or a more exploded form than their solid or liquid configurations.
Synthetics: Synthetic elements and molecules that do not exist in nature and (generally) desire to decay unless kept under tight containment. Difficult to create, harder to contain, and essential for advanced technology.
Planets and Planetary Infrastructure
Every star represents a single potentially habitable planet. Each planet has one value for size and five values for resources, as well as accessibility ratings. The value for the resource is the theoretical max the planet could produce per turn, given ideal infrastructure. The accessibility rating represents your present ability to mine/capture/farm that resource- if you controlled the planet. Thus, a basic planet's readout, without infrastructure, looks something like:
Size: 3
Transplutonics: 1800 | 10% | 180/turn
Organics: 6500 | 10% | 650/turn
Metals: 5000 | 20% | 1000/turn
Energetics: 3600 | 20% | 720/turn
Synthetics: 150 | 0% | 0/turn
After infrastructure is added on, the readout changes to reflect the bonuses from various technologies. At start, everyone has the ability to bring the accessibility up by 25% with various technologies. Homeworlds start with 50% across the board, to represent the ideal 25% basic extraction rate with the best attached starting facilities. The exception is synthetics, which starts at 25%, since you can't natively extract synthetics. So the world above, with partial infrastructure, looks like:
Size: 3
Transplutonics: 1800 | 10% + 20% (High-Energy Processing facilities IV) | 440/turn
Organics: 6500 | 10% + 10% (Modular Farms II) | 650/turn
Metals: 5000 | 20% + 15% (Mining Station III)| 1750/turn
Energetics: 3600 | 20% | 720/turn
Synthetics: 150 | 0% + 25% (Elemental Synthesis Facility V) | 37/turn
The cost of infrastructure is modified by the size of the planet, which in turn modifies how much of a given resource a planet is likely to have. Aside from resource extraction infrastructure, there's also defensive infrastructure, which is designed to let the planet either help during orbital combat or provide protection against invading armies. Defense stations, GtS missile silos, orbital fighter bays, planetary shields, etc, are all examples of defensive infrastructure. During planetary bombardment, there's a chance, based on the combined firepower of the attacking fleet and how good they are at actually hitting the surface, for damage to be done to surface facilities. If a facility is damaged, its rank is dropped by one.
If a player captures a planet that retains intact civilian facilities that they already understand, they can use them at half efficacy. If they can already build such facilities themselves, they can bring them up to full production for a quarter of the facility's normal cost. If they don't understand a facility, they can attempt to spend revisions, or designs if they think its warranted, to gain understanding.
Production: Each nation has a certain amount of dedicated war production, which is a pool from which complete vessels and outfitted regiments can be purchased using production plans. Production plans, created through revisions, are a bill that contains every aspect of a ship, down to the last detail, and costs a specific number of production points- determined at the time the revision roll is made. Every turn you get to decide how your points are allocated, and partial builds are allowed. That is, if a production plan costs more production points than you currently have, it will be partially completed and will automatically pull points next round. Regiments, complete with all attachments, can also be constructed from the production point pool in the same manner.
Production points are gained from planets, based on the total resource income from each planet. Certain structures may be capable of boosting these numbers, but, at base, production is determined by,
Transplutonics Production * 3
Organics Production * 1
Metals Production * 1
Energetics Production * 1.5
Synthetics Production * 7.5
This same formula can be applied to production patterns, replacing 'production' with 'cost' to gain an estimate of how much the pattern will cost. Again, this may be able to be altered down the road. In general, production points should be set aside for tried and true ships and units- the backbone of the armies that will be flung from year to year. It's there to make things nicer and easier to take care of than juggling the TOMES resources. The TOMES resources, then, are more for allocating towards special projects, creating the specialized fleets needed to turn the tide of a battle, and building infrastructure up on worlds. Infrastructure projects cannot be supported via production points, so this is a particularly important role.
Everybody has the same FTL travel: The Bore Drive. This is basically the big lie of the setting that allows the dynamic of space combat to change to something slightly more comprehensible without undue logical gymnastics, it's the big lie that allows for fleets to travel between solar systems in real-time without breaking Einstein's cage or utilizing engines of horrifyingly monstrous destructive power, and generally adds an element of spice to the Arms Race.
The gist of it is that there is a baseline technology called a Bore Drive that can create an effective wormhole between two points in space. The location where the wormhole is initiated is referred to as the genesis, the destination is referred to as the terminus, and the hole itself is referred to as the aperture. As long as the aperture is stable, matter and energy can slip through without consequence, nearly regardless of distance. The energy required to create a bore exhibits logarithmic growth with regards to distance, with an initial input energy modified exponentially with regard to the radius of the aperture being created. In addition to the energy required, the computation time required to generate a stable bore scales sub-exponentially with distance- though the distance calculated is not necessarily a straight line, and this law is dependent on there being a path to the target which is mostly composed of hard vacuum with only stable, or semi-stable interference sources along the way. Boring out of, into, or through an atmosphere is ridiculously difficult compared to boring through empty vacuum. Bores are also inherently unstable, they are created based on a mathematical model accurate only at the moment of their creation- and thus rapidly expires as time passes. As the model expires, the bore becomes more and more unstable, emitting radiation relative to the input mass, and damaging anything that passes through it. While a slightly unstable bore can likely be survived by an armored vessel, a frayed or highly unstable bore will tear apart (or worse, collapse on) anything that passes through it. Bores themselves are also fragile, and using them degrades them over time. The more mass and energy pass through a bore, the more decayed and unstable it becomes.
It's important to remember that bores are directional. Anything moving through the genesis will be transported to the terminus, but one can pass through the terminus without effect- though this does risk being rammed by whatever is coming through the bore.
The 3 Axioms of Bore Travel
- The smaller the diameter, the less energy you need.
- The longer the distance, the more time and energy you need.
- The longer a bore has been in existence and the more it has been used, the more dangerous it is to traverse.
The interdiction of a bore can be achieved simply by complicating the model with as much relevant noise as possible. The designs of interdiction fields are numerous, but the basic idea is to create a schodastic interferent electromagnetically, physically, or gravitationally. This complicates the computations required to generate a stable aperature, dramatically slow even short-range jumps and either making it difficult or impossible to achieve a 'clean' bore. It is possible to generate a bore through interdiction, but creating a bore using a model that is incorrect even at the moment of its creation generates a ragged aperature (how ragged depends on how 'close' the model was) that will at best damage and at worst destroy anything that passes through it.
The consequences of this lie are numerous, but a few are worth exploring in greater detail. FTL communication is achievable by micro-bores dialed into specific or semi-specific locations. With enough bore drives to open and close bores, and the computation power devoted to recalculated new bore trajectories, high bandwidth connections can be established where the primary speed limitation is the 'air gap' where the EM signal propagates through free space instead of being transmitted through the bore. Large ships can achieve effective FTL sensors by opening small bores to near-field locations (such as a few light-minutes) and firing probes equipped with micro-boring transmitters. Smaller information gathering ships often do not have the luxury of mounting bore-capable drones, and instead make due with 'porpoising'. Patrol ships 'porpoise' by take a patrol route and jumping between a number of determined points, spending enough time there to recharge their bore drive and gather sensor information before moving on to the next point. In this manner, even a relatively small and ill-equipped fleet can create an FTL sensor network via mosaic search pattern. Naturally, however, such maneuvers can create bizarre after-images when a ship arrives
before its earlier lightspeed electromagnetic reflection. A ship making multiple Bore jumps in a straight line would first be 'seen' at its closest approach, and then would briefly appear to flicker into existence at each of its earlier locations as its afterimage catches up.
Setting Modifiers
Soft-Serve Science: You want your reactor to run off the power of a forsaken psionic child channeling the energy of a dark star God? Sounds great, just give me a write-up. This isn't a hard science game- this is a game where one could conceivably get away with SPEHSS MAHRENS and SPEHSS MAGICKS, not one where I'm going to nag you over perfectly reasonable details of science and 'but reality doesn't do that'. I'm not going to make you write a paper on the exact physics that justify a waveforce shield or a mantra powered Buddhism laser- but you do need to beware the golden rule of the universe: 'Shit ain't Free'. Everything, no matter how advanced, has a price. Actions have Consequences.
Begin at your Beginnings: This game will have a special opening phase, seven turns in length. During this period, the final phase of each turn is skipped- so there is no production, deployment and tactics. Instead, you are given ten dice per turn, and you will be asked to create the designs for most of your starting tech.
Everybody in Space Sciences English: Everybody has the same FTL drive technology, the Bore Drive. You can dick with it as you will, justify it however you want, and re-flavor how you generate the bore as you wish. Mechanically, however, everyone starts on the same FTL playing field.
Batreps [/list]
Author
Topic: GalactiRace Core Thread | Turn 5. It's Laaate... (Read 11435 times)