Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 41 42 [43] 44 45 ... 64

Author Topic: Beginner Mafia 2: BYOR Edition - Game Over!  (Read 34862 times)

Lenglon

  • Bay Watcher
  • Everyone cries, the question is what follows it.
    • View Profile
Re: Beginner Mafia 2: BYOR Edition - Day 2: Pecking Orders
« Reply #630 on: July 17, 2022, 06:05:11 am »

NJW: Are you going to complain about the distinction without a difference between misunderstanding your posts and ignoring your distinctions without a difference, or are you going to respond to FoU's accusations?
Logged
((I don't think heating something that is right above us to a ridiculous degree is very smart. Worst case scenario we become +metal statues+. This is a finely crafted metal statue. It is encrusted with sharkmist and HMRC. On the item is an image of HMRC and Pancaek. Pancaek is laughing. The HMRC is melting. The artwork relates to the encasing of the HMRC in metal by Pancaek during the Mission of Many People.))

NJW2000

  • Bay Watcher
  • You know me. What do I know?
    • View Profile
Re: Beginner Mafia 2: BYOR Edition - Day 2: Pecking Orders
« Reply #631 on: July 17, 2022, 06:05:46 am »

Ok, I'll reply to some of FoU's endless wall, but I honestly don't have time to line-by-line the whole thing, especially in a game in which I don't currently have a vote or high hopes of persuading the one person who does. If people want me to address another of his points, I'm happy to do that, but tell me which. Let's address what he thinks is the strongest point.

Quote
NJW2000 is not hunting scum, and refuses to acknowledge that that is what I am doing.

I mean, I've pressed a bunch of people on stuff I found disturbing: Shake on the not-seeing-facetiousness tell, Max on his preference for Egan over you, Tric on what could have been a scumslip but it's very hard to tell with Tric, Egan on knowingly playing weakly and using his newness as an excuse, etc. So yeah, I've been looking for scum.


As to the fact you've been scumhunting... sure you have. I acknowledge you did it D1, and I implicitly acknowledged it then by, you know, not pointing out "this vet isn't scumhunting at all, that's crazy!".

Thing is, mafia can scumhunt too. You're a forum vet, so if you couldn't convincingly fake looking for scum, you'd have a reputation for being incredibly easily read. Which I'm pretty sure you don't. You eliminated Egan at least in part for not scumhunting as much and as loudly as other players, even though that was stupid, because of course they wouldn't, they're were a newbie miller in a crazy BYOR game. Again, you seem to have this mistaken idea that scumhunting -> always town, not scumhunting -> always scum. It doesn't. And you're insisting that the first one means people can't scumread you.

I don't vote based on virtue, I vote on who I actually think is scum.


Quote
Because, to put it simply, that is the strongest evidence against his argument that I must be scum. If I am actively scum hunting, attacking, creating cases - if I am acting town in every way other than claiming partial-miller late, then it undercuts his case, so he simply refuses to acknowledge it, and minimizes my points whenever possible.

Again, stop representing me as saying you must be scum. I thought you were the best choice D1, I don't have 100% confidence in my D1 reads.

Besides, you posted this in your mega-post after me, HERE, explicitly stating that I don't think you're mafia. Unless you were referring to my case yesterday, but the point stands that a mafia player can look active and helpful, while a town player like Egan can look unhelpful. Would have been nice to see some evidence that you actually read that post, but hey.

I really wish people would actually read my posts.
Logged
One wheel short of a wagon

Knightwing64

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Most Handsome Bay12 Member
    • View Profile
Re: Beginner Mafia 2: BYOR Edition - Day 2: Pecking Orders
« Reply #632 on: July 17, 2022, 06:46:02 am »

( I’m going on a trip,  and I won’t get there for another few hours. I can post when I’m there, but don’t expect me to post for today.)
Logged

Lenglon

  • Bay Watcher
  • Everyone cries, the question is what follows it.
    • View Profile
Re: Beginner Mafia 2: BYOR Edition - Day 2: Pecking Orders
« Reply #633 on: July 17, 2022, 07:00:30 am »

Ok, I'll reply to some of FoU's endless wall, but I honestly don't have time to line-by-line the whole thing, especially in a game in which I don't currently have a vote or high hopes of persuading the one person who does. If people want me to address another of his points, I'm happy to do that, but tell me which. Let's address what he thinks is the strongest point.
Okay.
I try to avoid interfering in lynch case like FoU's until after the target of the case has responded, so I waited until NJW gave an actual response, but I'll now go through FoU's case point by point and give my feedback. I'll be withholding my opinion on anything I want you to respond to NJW, but I'll be voicing my view on the rest for the sake of transparency.
Spoiler: Section 1 (click to show/hide)
NJW: Please respond to this
Spoiler: Section 2 (click to show/hide)
FoU: I am having trouble understanding what you're pushing at here. Could you please rephrase this accusation? It seems to me like your narrative of NJW's behavior is contradictory, and that makes the narrative far less convincing.
Spoiler: Section 3 (click to show/hide)
FoU: I don't actually mind NJW asking for you to repeat something you'd said before in a slightly different way, it is a scumhunting tactic that gives a liar a chance to trip up and contradict themselves.
Spoiler: Section 4 (click to show/hide)
NJW: Please respond to this
Spoiler: Section 5 (click to show/hide)
NJW: Please respond to this
Spoiler: Section 6 (click to show/hide)
NJW: Please respond to this
Spoiler: Section 7 (click to show/hide)
FoU: I think this is actually part of your argument that I was confused by before, which I am still not quite sure what the narrative is that you're attempting to show with.
Spoiler: Section 8 (click to show/hide)
FoU: To be fair, at the time NJW said these things you had not presented your case yet. I don't mind dismissing a case that hasn't been made yet as a case that hasn't been made yet. Also, this section feels kinda misrepresentation-ey, which I'd really REALLY prefer if you avoided doing when part of your own case is that NJW is misrepresentation-ey.
Spoiler: Section 9 (click to show/hide)
NJW: Please respond to this.
Logged
((I don't think heating something that is right above us to a ridiculous degree is very smart. Worst case scenario we become +metal statues+. This is a finely crafted metal statue. It is encrusted with sharkmist and HMRC. On the item is an image of HMRC and Pancaek. Pancaek is laughing. The HMRC is melting. The artwork relates to the encasing of the HMRC in metal by Pancaek during the Mission of Many People.))

Lenglon

  • Bay Watcher
  • Everyone cries, the question is what follows it.
    • View Profile
Re: Beginner Mafia 2: BYOR Edition - Day 2: Pecking Orders
« Reply #634 on: July 17, 2022, 08:09:34 am »

EBWOP: I mis-grouped one of the quotes. The first quote in section 4 should actually have been added to the bottom of Section 3.
Logged
((I don't think heating something that is right above us to a ridiculous degree is very smart. Worst case scenario we become +metal statues+. This is a finely crafted metal statue. It is encrusted with sharkmist and HMRC. On the item is an image of HMRC and Pancaek. Pancaek is laughing. The HMRC is melting. The artwork relates to the encasing of the HMRC in metal by Pancaek during the Mission of Many People.))

Lenglon

  • Bay Watcher
  • Everyone cries, the question is what follows it.
    • View Profile
Re: Beginner Mafia 2: BYOR Edition - Day 2: Pecking Orders
« Reply #635 on: July 17, 2022, 08:18:45 am »

NJW: Do you mind saying who you think is scum at this time and why?
Logged
((I don't think heating something that is right above us to a ridiculous degree is very smart. Worst case scenario we become +metal statues+. This is a finely crafted metal statue. It is encrusted with sharkmist and HMRC. On the item is an image of HMRC and Pancaek. Pancaek is laughing. The HMRC is melting. The artwork relates to the encasing of the HMRC in metal by Pancaek during the Mission of Many People.))

TricMagic

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Beginner Mafia 2: BYOR Edition - Day 1: Bwuk Bwuk Little Chickens
« Reply #636 on: July 17, 2022, 08:47:59 am »

Well, what I was really going for was to find someone to attack. I recall hearing that picking at whoever votes for you is an acceptable beginner strategy, so I went for that. Shakerag doesn't seem scummy to me at this point, but it doesn't really matter so much as that I got them to say some stuff and hopefully that helps people with more developed instincts than me.
This is bad. You've heard it's ok for newbie players to do something that's bad, so you did it? And you're waiting for stronger players to figure out the game?

That's a very convenient position for mafia to take. Instead, try to play well, and actually play the game. You may not have played much mafia, but you're smart, so scumhunt.




MaximumSpin - I've never been able to read him and seldom find him useful before D3.

First Post here. (As with all of these, just click the message link to see the whole thing, but this bit might be relevant?)

Of note, Egan doesn't think Fal is scum, and Fal unvotes to stop a hammering of Max.
Unvote. Quick check shows, you, NJW, Tric, and me on Max, and that's one vote off from hammer. I'd rather not have someone accidentally execute Max within something like the first 24 hours of the day.
Between this post and NJW's. Currently only one of them, instead we have infighting.

Alright, back from the mall. Alot of posts have been flung around and it seems everyone is centering toward Max?

Also, Lenglon is acting kind of aggro.. Could be a town demeanor... but I feel like it's way too early to be acting this aggressive. On a D1 one, there is nothing to really go off of.
It's these sorts of posts that make me think Lidku is scum... You had better have a strong day 3.


Quote from: Maximum Spin
NJW2000 and Lidku have not posted much. I think NJW has only posted once, and it feels like Lidku has done barely more than that. I don't trust this. Honestly, if I had to pick one OTP Scumteam out of everyone, I might say it's just the two of them riding it out and hoping to casually get me lynched in the shitfight.

Quote from: Maximum Spin
I guess I should unvote.
NJW2000 and Lidku, what're you two up to?

Quote from: Maximum Spin
Oh, Lidku just showed up, while I was writing, huh. Moving my vote to NJW2000 then. He still needs to DO MORE, though.

Apologies for the inactivity, but I DID preface earlier that I was at the mall doing IRL matters.

This is my second BYOR game and I think I just usually like to be passive in general on D1, then try to actively solve on D2 (like I did before). There is just never enough to go on in a D1 to make any substantive determination on who is Mafia, in general. The D1 vote, if it occurs, most likely just kills a town; then after that, the Mafia will be able to get another kill on N1.
Probobly a bit late.. But if nothing is done on Day 1, there is nothing to go off of on day 2. Being worried about town numbers is odd when there are 9 of us.

To everyone that isn't Egan. Do you think Egan and I are the scumteam?
I am not interested in speculating about the scumteam as a group, and performing relational analysis, on day 1.

Individually you are each more townie than the players that have not posted enough content to form a read off of (Tric, Knightwing, NJW).

NJW has posted recently. That just really leaves Tric and Knightwing.. but I personally think inactivity is a somewhat weak modem to go off of... They could be doing IRL things. Usually I believe it's more likely that the Mafia is always active in a thread, as a means to deflect suspicion that they COULD be Mafia.. An inverse of what you've posted.
...Here's the other half of why I think Lidku may be scum. Out of the many many parts. Hunt! If you don't hunt, you get suspected.


Page 18 has a few NJW posts.

For me? My action would show up as targeting Max in that scenario, assuming I wasn't redirected or some other shenaniganery.

My actions show up as mafiakill actions, but their apparent targeting is not modified from what it actually is.


Now this is WEIRD. Because the same does not seem to be true of Egan. See:

Shakerag - Please explain Miller Theory regarding D1 claims.

Oh I just realized I missed that.  I stick by the old (relative to this subforum) rules that you always claim miller ASAP.  To do otherwise is to invite doubt.
Ah in that case I'm like, omega miller. Inspects show me as mafia, surveys show my action as mafiakill, and tracking shows me as visiting whoever was killed.

So there are different Omega-millers in play?

Ho hum. I find that hard to believe. Also, have a look through Fal and EgAns early interactions. They’re just a tad weird. At the very least, I think FoU is lying here.

Anything to say for yourself, FallacyOfUrist?

I suppose a question to NJW would be thus. What was weird about them? Also last game literally had a grandfather, but with Egan claiming second, Fal's chance of lying drops. Unless that's what webaict wants us to think..

Last post of the page is using role logic in a webadict game to decry Fal's role.


come to think of it, Lidku, I don't think anyone has really engaged with you today so far. How do you feel about that? Also, if you could get an investigate result on someone as a bonus action tonight, who would you pick? And if you had to take a vigi shot RIGHT NOW, who would you shoot with it?

For an investigation action, I would choose between either Egan, TricMagic, and admittedly... you.

You, because I feel like you're being a tad-bit aggressive for D1. Almost like you're trying hard to be considered Town with your constant activity and trying to grasp at things to nail who you suspect as Mafia.. an attempt to detract suspicion from yourself, perhaps?

TricMagic because he has been silent lately and he is usually more active than this. Though again, like I've broached before, it all could be IRL activities consuming up his time.

Egan, as a means to really discern of what they're saying about their "Miller" ability being true. But apparently the whole point of a "Miller" automatically typecasts the user as Mafia, no matter what? Then it becomes extremely hard to gauge whether or not Egan TRULY is either Mafia and Town (which is, I believe, is what everyone has been arguing these past pages.. I just realized we're still on D1, but at least somewhat half-up to the page number of the previous BYOR game :o).



Now, as for what I would do if I had a vigilante ability: I would save it for until I at least highly suspect someone. Doing the wrong the kill + a lynch vote killing a Town and not a Mafia member + the decided Mafia kill would devastate Town, bringing us way closer to a loss in one Day/Night. If I had such an ability, I would never disclose it and save it for at least N2 or N3 (if I was still alive, that is) for someone I highly suspected.
... Sigh.... Really Lidku? Out of context this would be rather horrible. But it does setup Lenglon's day2 claim nicely. Hmm..
...32 pages of talk somehow, yet NJW/Lidku aren't on the lynch. Good job town.


Linebreak until the next NJW posts. Right now, Lenglon and Knightwing are town-reads. Not touching Skake with a ten-foot pole though.

Lidku, a question for you. What should town do to achieve cohesion and trust in one another?


Wait a moment...
(Ninja Lenglon)

Yeah, NJW2000 has rubbed me wrong all game. Enough's enough. He dies.

*various nonsense*
I find a common scum tactic to be argument-dismissal, that is, either misinterpreting or selectively quoting someone's post to make them look weaker than they actually are. NJW2000 has been doing this all game.
Also, NJW, it's a little odd that you decided to cut out such tiny segments of my post and removed their context. You also didn't address the conclusion at the bottom in any way. Why did you do that? It already was a fairly small post, and it's especially odd that you would remove the context from my statements while pitching a fit about how I wasn't representing yours properly.
The lack of suspiscions is not good.

I'm kind of ok with an Egan flip as I feel it may solve the FoU slot in some manner. I would prefer to see FoU eliminated though.


Will do a readslist but later... I have a train journey that would be perfect for that.

In any case, deep breath.



2) Egan town FoU scum. - you are advocating for this
Show me where I did this. Just show me where. Read my posts. Then reread them. Then see if you can pick out the bit where I say this.

Quote
I'm not misrepresenting anything. You are dismissing out of hand option 4, and you have stated that your reason for doing so is that it is to aduacious to be true. I consider this reason completely unacceptable.
I am saying it is too unlikely to be reasonably accepted. READ MY POSTS. QUOTE THEM. Don't just ascribe random positions to me.

STOP MISREPRESENTING ME. I imagine several players don't particularly feel the need to see you survive the elim. If you continue to misrepresent what I say, I will be one of them. I don't care for players who post angry textwalls and fail to read the thread.

All I can say is practice what your preach, do unto others as you would do unto yourself, and all that jazz.

Also, NJW, it's a little odd that you decided to cut out such tiny segments of my post and removed their context. You also didn't address the conclusion at the bottom in any way. Why did you do that? It already was a fairly small post, and it's especially odd that you would remove the context from my statements while pitching a fit about how I wasn't representing yours properly.
You posted lies about what I said and didn’t quote me. I quoted those lies and explained that they were lies. If you think the context of a statement is more important than the actual truth about what was written in a thread, I don’t really think it’s possible for me to usefully communicate with you. You’re going to have to start responding to what was written, not what you vaguely imagine from a skimread, or this isn’t going to work.

I’m going to be patient, and respond to your question. The difference between saying that an event is improbable  compared to plausible alternatives and saying that scum would never be audacious enough to do it is that one is the first thing I just said and the other is the second.

At this point I'm just quoting the end of this thread. Let's see if I can't unravel the sheet you're hiding behind.


In any case, readslist:

(rather quick and scrappy, as it turns out, because I know who I have as scum already.)

Egan_BW: Lean scum. Highly dubious claim, admittedly. Many dubious points such as "haha we're both scum" with a nervy response from FoU as their first interaction, lack of suspects... and this. If scum, probably with FoU.
FallacyofUrist: Scum. I don't really think there's going to be an omega-miller and a specialised-miller in the same game. If there are, Web has essentially created a bastard game instead of anything like a newbie game. I stand by my reasoning about the unlikelihood of a miller gambit + specialised miller guess on Egan's part, so I'm pretty sure FoU is scum. They also claimed miller quite late, which is not a townie thing to do.
Knightwing64: probably town. Tone reads as genuine (though mafia can get annoyed). D1
Lenglon: highly emotionally invested town. Obsessively pushing newer players and bringing in emotional/moral judgements, so helping noone, but probably louder D1 than they'd bother being as scum.
Lidku:Null. Not rocking the boat much. This post contains an "I'll vote if you insist", but Lidku may just be an unusually strong beginner, still liable to make that kind of error.
Maximum Spin: Weak scum lean. I can never really read Max well, but his defence of FoU over ER was a bit off.
Shakerag: Null. Not doing anything too aggressive, fair amount of activity. Not applying much vote pressure but asking questions. Strong and experienced enough that I'm very unlikely to catch them out D1, so can't call them town. Someone missing facetiousness is the subtlest tell I know, but if they're just autistic, it's not one I can use.
TricMagic: Lean town. Slightly ghostly presence but has made claims about what they'll be doing tonight, asked some reasonable questions.[/spoiler]

In conclusion: Kill Fallacy Now.
Why am I lean-town when Lidku is Null? And not for the same reasons Shakerag is null, just that he's not rocking the boat. That is in and of itself suspicious, town should be hunting. A lot of this is tunneling Fal all day 1, and now into day 2 even with the supposed town confirmation.

« Reply #256 on: July 12, 2022, 08:55:01 am »
This is when NJW voted Fal. While he made other votes during the day, at a quick glance they're all Fal. Which messes with Mamobo something fierce since the asterisk only counts the most recent. Before that it was Max during the game start, on his first post. We can pretty much dismiss it since there was no follow up and the Fal vote is the third post, second with actual meat to it, lean as it is.

In any case, Lidku and NJW are both on Fal at Page 28.


... That's it.. Looking back over day one, the number of NJW posts is shockingly small. The reads list is the last bit of data we have that day. One thing that stood out is the lack of... Connection NJW had with most players. Compared to the many many posts between the main 4 which make up the bulk of day 1, it's very stringy.

So yeah, posting.
Logged

Lidku

  • Bay Watcher
  • Enclave here, why isn't your video feed working?
    • View Profile
    • [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/Ylvdlc5.jpg[/IMG]
Re: Beginner Mafia 2: BYOR Edition - Day 2: Pecking Orders
« Reply #637 on: July 17, 2022, 09:51:53 am »

Quote from: TricMagic
That's it.. Looking back over day one, the number of NJW posts is shockingly small.

Ironic you say that to begin with, considering it was YOU that was noted on D1 of having little to no posts/activity. Remember I was the one trying to give you the benefit of the doubt, and say that inactivity is not a strong reason to suspect someone?

Quote from: TricMagic
... Sigh.... Really Lidku? Out of context this would be rather horrible.

How even "out of context" does that post you quoted seem "rather horrible"? You just quoted but didn't really elaborate, just detracting it seems. Where is your argumentative logic in claiming it would be "horrible out of context"?

Quote from: TricMagic
Probobly a bit late.. But if nothing is done on Day 1, there is nothing to go off of on day 2. Being worried about town numbers is odd when there are 9 of us.

And yet you were barely active to begin with on D1, which was bringing suspicions on you in the first place, and in which I tried to defend you against people soft-claiming against you for inactivity.

Quote from: TricMagic
In any case, Lidku and NJW are both on Fal at Page 28.

I don't know particularly about NJW, but to speak for myself, I simply just noted the inherent weirdness of FallacyofUrist's ability and how it interacted with Maximum Spin being isolated by the crane. It wasn't a case of me being "on FallacyofUrist".

Lidku: If you’re going to vote someone, do it because you think they’re scum, not because it’s just easier to leave a vote on them. Do you think I am mafia, with high or moderate confidence, or are you just voting so Lenglon doesn’t hunt you down?

The page you even mention (pg.28) is where Fallacy convinced me to change my D1 vote to you TricMagic, since I started to feel strongest of you being scum, due to your weird behavior on D1. Your argument on me being "on Fallacy" doesn't make sense since my end-of-day vote remained on you, while everyone else was either dogpiling on either Egan or Fallacy (in which you were part of the vote on Egan).

Also, didn't you inference Knightwing and NJW being on a team a few posts ago? Why did that evaporate?

Post in question:

To note, my day 1 actions means I'm fine with dying Knightwing. I'm kinda wondering if this is a way to try and save NJW now...

What did you mean by this post exactly? Are you relaying that you think Knightwing could be using somesort of tactic to "save NJW" from being lynched (since everyone in the thread seems to be focusing on him now)? And if so, why did you post this but not elaborate further, instead moving on to me at random being in a team with NJW, with shaky arguments (which were just quoting things from the thread and just inputting some blurbs.. nothing truly extensive).

As for your direct question for me:

Quote from: TricMagic
Lidku, a question for you. What should town do to achieve cohesion and trust in one another?

It was something I already mentioned before in the thread. Just being inquisitorial but be sportsmen-like about it. No need to get a player riled to a point where they're throwing around insults and having bad feelings with each other. Aggression isn't a license just to make people feel bad about the game.

But I feel like the aggression has simmered down lately, so it's not really something I'm worrying about at the moment.
Logged

Mamobo

  • Bay Watcher
  • Mafia Moderation Bot
    • View Profile
Re: Beginner Mafia 2: BYOR Edition - Day 2: Pecking Orders
« Reply #638 on: July 17, 2022, 10:02:57 am »

Vote Count
------------------------
FallacyofUrist - 0 - Shakerag*,
Knightwing64 - 0 -
Lenglon - 0 -
Lidku - 0 -
Maximum Spin - 0 -
NJW2000 - 0 - TricMagic*, FallacyofUrist*,
Shakerag - 0 -
TricMagic - 0 -
No One - 0 -

Not Voting - 1 - Knightwing64, Lenglon, Lidku, Maximum Spin*, NJW2000,

1 to Hammer. Day ends on July 18, 2022 at 20:00 CDT (~33 hours remaining).


NOTE: Players without votes are displayed in italics.
Logged
Mamobo stands for Mafia Moderation Bot! Mamobo was made by webadict to help those in need!

Mamobo hates villainy and lawlessness! Mamobo loves blueberries!

Mamobo is happy to be of use! If you'd like to improve Mamobo, please do something else instead!

TricMagic

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Beginner Mafia 2: BYOR Edition - Day 2: Pecking Orders
« Reply #639 on: July 17, 2022, 10:22:22 am »

Quote from: TricMagic
That's it.. Looking back over day one, the number of NJW posts is shockingly small.

Ironic you say that to begin with, considering it was YOU that was noted on D1 of having little to no posts/activity. Remember I was the one trying to give you the benefit of the doubt, and say that inactivity is not a strong reason to suspect someone?
Is this really inactivity though? They've been pushing for a Fal lynch, been pushing a case, but the overall number of posts is fairly small. While they could be called quality, there needs to be more Day 2 to actually push the lynch and convince Lenglon.
I'll admit my wall isn't the easiest to read, but I don't think their case is convincing enough to lynch someone they themselves got a town result from. It's odd they're pushing it in the first place I guess.


Quote from: TricMagic
... Sigh.... Really Lidku? Out of context this would be rather horrible.

How even "out of context" does that post you quoted seem "rather horrible"? You just quoted but didn't really elaborate, just detracting it seems. Where is your argumentative logic in claiming it would be "horrible out of context"?
Shouldn't really need to. Put simply, you're saying you'd either want to investigate Lenglon, which is fair but horrid with the context of day 2, Egan, which is likewise such with day 2, or me, which is pointless given my lack of posts. It's something that looking back could be used to push an argument that you don't really want to build a town-core of people. While Godfather's may be a possibility, if you could confirm a strong player as town you could use that to snip away at the veil hiding who the mafia actually is. Lenglon's the only person in this list that is useful for that, and by tying them to Egan and I makes it seems like you're casting shade on Lenglon's town status.


Quote from: TricMagic
Probobly a bit late.. But if nothing is done on Day 1, there is nothing to go off of on day 2. Being worried about town numbers is odd when there are 9 of us.

And yet you were barely active to begin with on D1, which was bringing suspicions on you in the first place, and in which I tried to defend you against people soft-claiming against you for inactivity.
An issue with this is that I was putting myself out there during the times I posted.

... Really Lidku? I just explained what my role ability was.

You're saying that your role is "An Entire Game of BYOR Mafia," which was Maximum Spin's chosen role for the previous BYOR game we were in (and like I pointed out before, a role you didn't have in the previous game, but something else you had). His role didn't have the ability you claim it does; the ability to supposedly grab other abilities from a previous game?

Can you please elaborate on what you're trying to explain about your role? Does it have the same abilities as Maximum Spin in the previous game; or is this some new ability you're claiming this previous role has, as something new that webadict had added to it?

Do you really think webadict would just reuse a role? I've already explained it, I can grab an ability from the previous game at the end of each day. And active abilities become 1-shots. Useless if I get lynched before I can even get one though.
I am still very annoyed at you not comprehending things Lidku. Protecting afk players cause they're busy with RL is both easy brownie points and could be segwayed into protecting an absent-ish mafia player.

If going by numbers, I still have more posts than NJW. Even if a good number is being suspisous and trying to draw a night-kill. Which just ended up with me having to reveal my role early, apparently.. I'm no good at drawing NKs it seems.

Quote from: TricMagic
In any case, Lidku and NJW are both on Fal at Page 28.

I don't know particularly about NJW, but to speak for myself, I simply just noted the inherent weirdness of FallacyofUrist's ability and how it interacted with Maximum Spin being isolated by the crane. It wasn't a case of me being "on FallacyofUrist".
Did you even bother to look at the page? It's right at the top, and at the moment both of you were voting Fal. That simple, doesn't matter if there is a case or not, just a statement of fact.

Lidku: If you’re going to vote someone, do it because you think they’re scum, not because it’s just easier to leave a vote on them. Do you think I am mafia, with high or moderate confidence, or are you just voting so Lenglon doesn’t hunt you down?

The page you even mention (pg.28) is where Fallacy convinced me to change my D1 vote to you TricMagic, since I started to feel strongest of you being scum, due to your weird behavior on D1. Your argument on me being "on Fallacy" doesn't make sense since my end-of-day vote remained on you, while everyone else was either dogpiling on either Egan or Fallacy (in which you were part of the vote on Egan).

Also, didn't you inference Knightwing and NJW being on a team a few posts ago? Why did that evaporate?

Post in question:

To note, my day 1 actions means I'm fine with dying Knightwing. I'm kinda wondering if this is a way to try and save NJW now...

What did you mean by this post exactly? Are you relaying that you think Knightwing could be using somesort of tactic to "save NJW" from being lynched (since everyone in the thread seems to be focusing on him now)? And if so, why did you post this but not elaborate further, instead moving on to me at random being in a team with NJW, with shaky arguments (which were just quoting things from the thread and just inputting some blurbs.. nothing truly extensive).
I'll note that was litteally last night for me. I just went through day one and picked up the posts, a reread and my thoughts. You know, the types of thing that lets other people see your inner workings? NJW's posts look fine on day 1, but on day 2 looking back, well. Hindsight is 20/20, and they don't look nearly as good now.

Your end of day vote being on me is also completely useless. While it pushed me to reveal my role, that also rendered me fairly safe from the lynch, allowing me to fulfill my set condition. You never actually pushed it. It's more an attempted bandwagon vote than anything else, if you weren't going to push it, then you should have gone after other suspected targets. This is part of what I meant by you having no impact on me day 1.

As for your direct question for me:


Quote from: TricMagic
Lidku, a question for you. What should town do to achieve cohesion and trust in one another?

It was something I already mentioned before in the thread. Just being inquisitorial but be sportsmen-like about it. No need to get a player riled to a point where they're throwing around insults and having bad feelings with each other. Aggression isn't a license just to make people feel bad about the game.

But I feel like the aggression has simmered down lately, so it's not really something I'm worrying about at the moment.
This was more a baited question, so good work on not falling for it and sticking to your root. Doesn't help me push a case on you, mind, but some fail and others catch a werewolf. (Catching out Moony is a highlight of my mafia gaming career on this forum. Wonder if you're be the next.)


Ninja Mamobo.
Logged

TricMagic

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Beginner Mafia 2: BYOR Edition - Day 2: Pecking Orders
« Reply #640 on: July 17, 2022, 10:24:32 am »

Start pushing cases, voting for people, and generally hunting Scum. Trying to stay sportsmanlike is fine, but sitting on a fence watching things is only acceptable if you've got a plan. If you thought me scum you should have bussed me with who you thought would be the kill target. But I don't think you ever brought up the argument that you couldn't do that cause of the Crane...
Logged

Maximum Spin

  • Bay Watcher
  • [OPPOSED_TO_LIFE] [GOES_TO_ELEVEN]
    • View Profile
Re: Beginner Mafia 2: BYOR Edition - Day 2: Pecking Orders
« Reply #641 on: July 17, 2022, 11:50:37 am »

Honestly, waking up every morning to no vote and a bunch of discussion I don't really have anything to add to kind of sucks.

Honestly, my top scumpick right now would be Shakerag, but only because he's flying under the radar so much.
Huh. Okay. I can actually get on board with this completely. Shakerag has been stubbornly null and I've been getting more and more concerned about it. I was expecting to have to wait until tomorrow to push on it. Do you have any previous Shakerag meta to back it up? I really don't myself. I'm not sure we've ever played together, certainly not very much.

For the record, I do read every post, even the long kind of repetitive TricMagic posts that drive me nuts even though he is making valid points, but it's hard to keep everything in memory when the day is boring me like this. I don't deal well with not having a vote. :P

But since Lenglon wants us to fake vote, Shakerag, tentatively.
Logged

Lidku

  • Bay Watcher
  • Enclave here, why isn't your video feed working?
    • View Profile
    • [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/Ylvdlc5.jpg[/IMG]
Re: Beginner Mafia 2: BYOR Edition - Day 2: Pecking Orders
« Reply #642 on: July 17, 2022, 12:30:36 pm »

Quote from: TricMagic
Put simply, you're saying you'd either want to investigate Lenglon, which is fair but horrid with the context of day 2, Egan, which is likewise such with day 2, or me, which is pointless given my lack of posts.

Your first two points are nonsensical, as you're projecting the past into the present. At the time of me answering Lenglon's question of who I wanted to theoretically investigate, if I had the ability, it was Day 1. It just seems like you're scrambling here, TricMagic

I fail to see how the advent of Day 2 itself brings any horrid context; except maybe for Egan being revealed as Town during the lynch, but they weren't even some I voted to lynch against and even though I was both suspicious of FallacyofUrist and Egan for their "Miller" abilities, I chose to lean into suspecting Fallacy over Egan of all things.

Lenglon is one of the people who there is a consensus they are the most probable Town, but there is no definitive proof that they necessarily are Town (which an Investigation ability would clear), so again.. no real "horrid context" I can imagine you seeing here.

Quote from: TricMagic
Did you even bother to look at the page? It's right at the top, and at the moment both of you were voting Fal. That simple, doesn't matter if there is a case or not, just a statement of fact.

For someone who talks about contexts, you seem to forget that I only voted FallacyofUrist because I felt pressured to vote by the others, and at that time, I felt it was more important to mechanically solve than to rely on purely "social" means of deduction (which my view on has gradually changed)

Anyways, since I'm being pressured to vote, I'll put one on FallacyofUrist. I just find him kinda shady, but nothing truly strong..

Just making statements isn't enough, TricMagic. Have a statement THEN follow it up with some good reasoning. By saying just because me and NJW happened to have voted for FallacyofUrist, you make an inference we could be a team? Explain your reasoning and don't just leave empty "statements".



And while I answered your question to me:

As for your direct question for me:


Quote from: TricMagic
Lidku, a question for you. What should town do to achieve cohesion and trust in one another?

It was something I already mentioned before in the thread. Just being inquisitorial but be sportsmen-like about it. No need to get a player riled to a point where they're throwing around insults and having bad feelings with each other. Aggression isn't a license just to make people feel bad about the game.

But I feel like the aggression has simmered down lately, so it's not really something I'm worrying about at the moment.
This was more a baited question, so good work on not falling for it and sticking to your root. Doesn't help me push a case on you, mind, but some fail and others catch a werewolf. (Catching out Moony is a highlight of my mafia gaming career on this forum. Wonder if you're be the next.)

You have conveniently ignored mine?

Also, didn't you inference Knightwing and NJW being on a team a few posts ago? Why did that evaporate?

Post in question:

To note, my day 1 actions means I'm fine with dying Knightwing. I'm kinda wondering if this is a way to try and save NJW now...

What did you mean by this post exactly? Are you relaying that you think Knightwing could be using somesort of tactic to "save NJW" from being lynched (since everyone in the thread seems to be focusing on him now)? And if so, why did you post this but not elaborate further, instead moving on to me at random being in a team with NJW, with shaky arguments (which were just quoting things from the thread and just inputting some blurbs.. nothing truly extensive).

Did you just mistakenly gloss over it, or chose not to answer it for other unknown reasons?
Logged

NJW2000

  • Bay Watcher
  • You know me. What do I know?
    • View Profile
Re: Beginner Mafia 2: BYOR Edition - Day 2: Pecking Orders
« Reply #643 on: July 17, 2022, 12:57:30 pm »

Spoiler: replies to Lenglon/FoU (click to show/hide)


NJW: Do you mind saying who you think is scum at this time and why?
Believe me, that's what I want to be working on, rather than arguing with Fallacy about a case on him I already dropped.

Right now, I'm most suspicious of Shakerag, as I've said, because he's being uncharacteristically quiet and just put you in a position where you're incentivised to not eliminate him. I mean, clearing and bodyguarding the person with the only vote? That may just be chance, but it looks dubious.

I would be going after FoU for some of the stuff he's posted today, but I'm *reasonably* convinced by the inspect, I don't think he's a godfather unless Web is screwing with us in a very specific and pointless way. I haven't read the Tric/Lidku stuff yet, but it might be alignment indicative, one lives in hope.




Will get to Lidku's question(s?) within... a few hours, hopefully. Just give me a second. That's a bunch of unspoilered textwalls to find questions in.
Logged
One wheel short of a wagon

Lenglon

  • Bay Watcher
  • Everyone cries, the question is what follows it.
    • View Profile
Re: Beginner Mafia 2: BYOR Edition - Day 2: Pecking Orders
« Reply #644 on: July 17, 2022, 02:18:37 pm »

NJW: Thank you for responding.

@1) okay, but that's not a response to what FoU actually said. He accused you of dismissing arguments without engagement, you... dismissed this argument without engaging with it.

@4) I think you might want to check the timeline of things, because that does not line up with the order that things happened in. You were more sympathetic when I had the moment of doll confusion, voted you, and swore at you. When I apologized, backed off, and stopped presenting myself in a confrontational and threatening way was when you became less sympathetic and fully disengaged.

@5) That does sound accurate to me.

@6) so your response is that you decided that in FoU's case you want to evaluate off of claims and mechanics instead of behavior, and are also accusing his behavior of being Look At Me I'm So Town. Is this correct?

@9) I suppose that's fine, but it is his summary and conclusion, and it would help avoid the accusations of dismissing arguments without engagement if you at least engaged with that part fully

And I see your argument about Shake. Do you think Shake should be today's lynch, or would you prefer someone else be the lynch for today?
Logged
((I don't think heating something that is right above us to a ridiculous degree is very smart. Worst case scenario we become +metal statues+. This is a finely crafted metal statue. It is encrusted with sharkmist and HMRC. On the item is an image of HMRC and Pancaek. Pancaek is laughing. The HMRC is melting. The artwork relates to the encasing of the HMRC in metal by Pancaek during the Mission of Many People.))
Pages: 1 ... 41 42 [43] 44 45 ... 64