Topic: Ridiculous Mafia (Round 1, Day 3 (1:3:Day)) CANCELED (Read 37705 times)

Wimdit · « **Reply #315 on:** March 29, 2009, 05:02:17 am »

Okay, I'm sort of feeling a need to defend myself here. I've been intending to put Org forward for lynching for a while, because a post restriction like that makes me suspicious. My thinking runs along these lines, more or less: leetspeak is typically assosciated with haxxors. Haxxors, in addition to being nasty, hack things. It seems to me that a hacker would be an ideal mafia role-finder.

And also, 'good probability that Wimdit is guilty'? What are you basing that on, other than my accusation of Org? I have to accuse someone, after all.

FoboslC · « **Reply #316 on:** March 29, 2009, 08:11:10 am »

So You think that all haxxors use 1337 speak? Bullshit. Only people who try to impersonate hackers, make everyone hink they are use 1337 speak. SO its absolute bullshit.
i was thinking it of some kin of "mad cop" or something, like each night he investigates a person and get opposite result or something, or maybe a random chance to roleblock somethink, or maybe it just a fucking post restriction after all.

NUKE9.13 · « **Reply #317 on:** March 29, 2009, 09:01:28 am »

Fobos: Remember that this is not real life; post restrictions are probably based on stereotypes.
Also, may I point out that org is not using 1337 speak... rather, he is not using any vowels. This, to me suggests something... ridiculous.
I will stand by my vote for wimdit for now; the chance of him being mafia is as good as anyone else's, and as shadowspy points out, things are going bad for the town... we probably should lynch someone.

Of course, if anyone has any information, at all, then I will change my stance to reflect this.

Org · « **Reply #318 on:** March 29, 2009, 09:07:07 am »

Pl34s3, d0nt lynch m3. My r0l3 1s 0nly g00d f0r th3 t0wn.

Pandarsenic · « **Reply #319 on:** March 31, 2009, 07:11:47 pm »

Damn you, people, be active....

Org · « **Reply #320 on:** March 31, 2009, 07:18:15 pm »

1m 4ct1v3. 1 w4tch, 4nd s0m3t1m3s p0st.

Karlito · « **Reply #321 on:** March 31, 2009, 08:35:02 pm »

In light of the slownes, I am going to stick by my earlier defense of Org and vote Wimdit.

Wimdit · « **Reply #322 on:** April 01, 2009, 12:05:33 am »

Aw man... I think this means I'm dead. Oh well.

FoboslC · « **Reply #323 on:** April 01, 2009, 07:33:59 pm »

rawr?!

FoboslC · « **Reply #324 on:** April 04, 2009, 01:18:19 pm »

Hello?

Org · « **Reply #325 on:** April 04, 2009, 02:37:40 pm »

h3ll0

Karlito · « **Reply #326 on:** April 04, 2009, 03:07:08 pm »

Pandarsenic · « **Reply #327 on:** April 04, 2009, 10:50:04 pm »

Er, wait. Do we have a vote majority?

inaluct · « **Reply #328 on:** April 04, 2009, 11:02:56 pm »

Vote Karlito.

Karlito · « **Reply #329 on:** April 04, 2009, 11:14:17 pm »

Hey, inaluct, you're dead. Why don't you stay ded?

Bay 12 Games Forum

News:

Author Topic: Ridiculous Mafia (Round 1, Day 3 (1:3:Day)) CANCELED (Read 37705 times)

Wimdit

Re: Ridiculous Mafia (Round 1, Day 3 (1:3:Day))

FoboslC

Re: Ridiculous Mafia (Round 1, Day 3 (1:3:Day))

NUKE9.13

Re: Ridiculous Mafia (Round 1, Day 3 (1:3:Day))

Org

Re: Ridiculous Mafia (Round 1, Day 3 (1:3:Day))

Pandarsenic

Re: Ridiculous Mafia (Round 1, Day 3 (1:3:Day))

Org

Re: Ridiculous Mafia (Round 1, Day 3 (1:3:Day))

Karlito

Re: Ridiculous Mafia (Round 1, Day 3 (1:3:Day))

Wimdit

Re: Ridiculous Mafia (Round 1, Day 3 (1:3:Day))

FoboslC

Re: Ridiculous Mafia (Round 1, Day 3 (1:3:Day))

FoboslC

Re: Ridiculous Mafia (Round 1, Day 3 (1:3:Day))

Org

Re: Ridiculous Mafia (Round 1, Day 3 (1:3:Day))

Karlito

Re: Ridiculous Mafia (Round 1, Day 3 (1:3:Day))

Pandarsenic

Re: Ridiculous Mafia (Round 1, Day 3 (1:3:Day))

inaluct

Re: Ridiculous Mafia (Round 1, Day 3 (1:3:Day))

Karlito

Re: Ridiculous Mafia (Round 1, Day 3 (1:3:Day))