Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 34 35 [36] 37 38 ... 43

Author Topic: Let's discuss 'Avatar.'  (Read 41194 times)

sonerohi

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Let's discuss 'Avatar.'
« Reply #525 on: April 05, 2010, 10:59:39 pm »

I hate to interrupt but what the hell is happening here? This is jumping between Avatar, Clash of the Titans, and the Israel-Palestine conflict with no discernible correlation.
Logged
I picked up the stone and carved my name into the wind.

Acanthus117

  • Bay Watcher
  • Angry Writer
    • View Profile
Re: Let's discuss 'Avatar.'
« Reply #526 on: April 05, 2010, 11:04:18 pm »

The internet is happening.
Logged
Is apparently a Lizardman. ಠ_ಠ
YOU DOUBLE PENIS
"The pessimist is either always right or pleasantly surprised; he cherishes that which is good because he knows it cannot last."

Forumsdwarf

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Let's discuss 'Avatar.'
« Reply #527 on: April 05, 2010, 11:50:23 pm »

Quote
The Muslims were there first
Jews have been living in Israel for thousands of years, surviving purges, pogroms, ethnic cleansing, and most recently unrelenting war.  And a slick propaganda campaign by their enemies designed to delegitimize their existence.  I've read the Hamas charter.

Quote
If you provoke a war by targeting civilians, you'd better expect to get a damned war.
Damn straight.  America would've torn them a new one.  Russia would have torn them apart.  China would do the Russian thing only much more quietly.  The Palestinians are lucky to have an opponent that shows such restraint.

Quote
In reality Israel bends over backwards rather than just kicking the whole Muslim population out of their country ...
Ethnic cleansing is something that Muslims do to Jews, not the reverse.  There are Muslims, Christians, and other religious minorities living in peace and security in Israel.
Wherever Muslims take over, on the other hand ... well ... here's a list:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_exodus_from_Arab_lands

Quote
(or making war in a method more fitting to the terrorist tactics of their opponents)
The Israelis seem to have resigned themselves to what they call "mowing the grass".  The "Russian Solution" isn't something they're ethically prepared to do, so they're left with the option of degrading the Palestinians' warfighting capability, a task which is never-ending.
If the Palestinians increased their threat potential or lethality, say if they developed or imported radiological weapons or started using chemical rounds in their artillery, I'm sure the kid gloves would come off without hesitation.
And the ENTIRE WORLD! would condemn ... the EVUL JOOS!  The Palestinians were only using chemical weapons because they were so desperate and oppressed they had no choice!  The band, in other words, would play on.

Quote
Israel has claim over the "holy land" because they come from there originally
The legitimacy of their claim really comes from their fighting a successful war of independence in the wake of a savage campaign of ethnic cleansing fought against them during the turbulent times between the fall of the Ottoman Empire, WWII, and the fall of the British Empire.
Israel has no less of a right to exist than Jordan or Iraq, and no one has the right to "kick the Jews out" of a place they've been living decades, centuries, or millenia regardless of the nationality controlling the territory.

Quote
which is why a number of they key rationalizations for Zionism are dumb
The creation of the State of Israel was made necessary by a ruthless campaign of ethnic cleansing by local Muslims.  As victims of an attempted ethnic cleansing the Israelis did the only thing they could to survive.

Quote
to a lesser extent since they're mostly the children or even grandchildren of immigrants
So immigrants are second-class citizens with weaker property rights than those whose genealogy extends further?  I'm beginning to see where you get your notions about who should be living in Israel.  Except there are Jews in Israel who've been there 3000 years who would be driven from their homes should the Palestinians get their way.  You seem to conveniently whip out the "firster" argument when it suits you then call it silly and stupid when it doesn't.

Quote
The Palestinians didn't [attack Israel].
Technically you're right.  The State of Israel didn't exist when the "Palestinians" attacked (they were Transjordanians at the time).  They waged a brutal, ruthless campaign of ethnic cleansing against Jews.  The creation of the State of Israel was a direct consequence of the savagery of the population we now call "Palestinians".  But no, they never attacked Israel, they only provoked its creation.
All the arguments about "who was there first" and your rather atavistic elevation of race above culture in determining social legitimacy is nullified by the War of Independence because of the nature of that war.  The Jews, some of them indigenous for 3000 years, some whose ancestors arrived by invitation of the Ottoman Turks, and some more recent arrivals, were fighting for their lives against a savage enemy bent on wiping out "The Jews", whatever their provenance or (as it seems important to you) specific racial composition.
The Jewish population's only choices were to be slaughtered, driven from their homes, or to fight back.  They chose the latter option and created the State of Israel so they could survive.  The right of the State of Israel to exist is the right of Jews to survive.  That fact on the ground was created by the people now known as Palestinians.
They made their bed.  They chose their fate.  They continue to wage war against Israel as they waged war against "The Jews", as before that they organized a division of the Waffen SS.
You'll pardon me if I don't take their claims of "victimhood" seriously.  They could end the war any time they wanted, then, now, or in the future, but instead they war obsessively with "The Jews" like Ahab hunting Moby Dick.
Logged
"Let them eat XXtroutXX!" -Troas

The Architect

  • Bay Watcher
  • Breeding supercows. What I've been doing on DF.
    • View Profile
Re: Let's discuss 'Avatar.'
« Reply #528 on: April 06, 2010, 12:00:56 am »

It's a war of racial and religious hatred for the Muslim side, and such things are normally condemned without a second look. It's preposterous to argue on the side of the terrorists.
Logged
Dwarf Fortress: where blunders never cease.
The sigs topic:
Oh man, this is truly sigworthy...
Oh man. This is truly sig-worthy.

Neruz

  • Bay Watcher
  • I see you...
    • View Profile
Re: Let's discuss 'Avatar.'
« Reply #529 on: April 06, 2010, 12:11:15 am »

It's a war of racial and religious hatred

Most wars are.

The Architect

  • Bay Watcher
  • Breeding supercows. What I've been doing on DF.
    • View Profile
Re: Let's discuss 'Avatar.'
« Reply #530 on: April 06, 2010, 12:13:56 am »

No, most wars are about power and wealth.

In fact, that's a completely silly generalization. What is your basis for even thinking that?
Logged
Dwarf Fortress: where blunders never cease.
The sigs topic:
Oh man, this is truly sigworthy...
Oh man. This is truly sig-worthy.

Neruz

  • Bay Watcher
  • I see you...
    • View Profile
Re: Let's discuss 'Avatar.'
« Reply #531 on: April 06, 2010, 12:25:35 am »

Depends on your perspective i suppose; one tends to lead to the other.

Acanthus117

  • Bay Watcher
  • Angry Writer
    • View Profile
Re: Let's discuss 'Avatar.'
« Reply #532 on: April 06, 2010, 12:34:46 am »

But generally, wars between countries occur because of desire for wealth/expansion more than religious hate.
Logged
Is apparently a Lizardman. ಠ_ಠ
YOU DOUBLE PENIS
"The pessimist is either always right or pleasantly surprised; he cherishes that which is good because he knows it cannot last."

ChairmanPoo

  • Bay Watcher
  • Send in the clowns
    • View Profile
Re: Let's discuss 'Avatar.'
« Reply #533 on: April 06, 2010, 01:09:53 am »

religion just provides a casus belli. But there are many others to choose from if you feel inclined
Logged
There's two kinds of performance reviews: the one you make they don't read, the one they make whilst they sharpen their daggers
Everyone sucks at everything. Until they don't. Not sucking is a product of time invested.

Neruz

  • Bay Watcher
  • I see you...
    • View Profile
Re: Let's discuss 'Avatar.'
« Reply #534 on: April 06, 2010, 01:16:09 am »

But generally, wars between countries occur because of desire for wealth/expansion more than religious hate.

You start with power, you end with hate.

Acanthus117

  • Bay Watcher
  • Angry Writer
    • View Profile
Re: Let's discuss 'Avatar.'
« Reply #535 on: April 06, 2010, 01:25:00 am »

I agree with that, Neruz. Then, the hate is grounds for more conflict, be it wars, racism or whatever.
Logged
Is apparently a Lizardman. ಠ_ಠ
YOU DOUBLE PENIS
"The pessimist is either always right or pleasantly surprised; he cherishes that which is good because he knows it cannot last."

Sergius

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Let's discuss 'Avatar.'
« Reply #536 on: April 06, 2010, 02:04:16 am »

I completely agree that Israel's fucking things over, just to make it clear. I just think that any "I was here first" argument is complete bullshit, and it's not the reason WHY Israel is wrong. I happen to think that a lot of Palestinian methods are wrong, too, but given their opponent I can't come up with a better solution, all I can do is condemn the murders they do commit. Honestly, both sides need to try and make this a moral war, not a tactical war. The side that stops killing people to achieve their goals is the side likeliest to win in the end, but the trouble is nobody's willing to do that because everybody feels (somewhat justly) wronged.

Again, you miss the point that "I was there first" isn't automatically invalid. If by "I" I mean, myself, as in, I was living there in my house and was kicked out to make room for somebody else, and right now I'm living somewhere else because I was kicked out from the house that I was probably going to leave to my children when I die, and dude, that TV you're watching, I bought it, and you're eating my food, I was right there like ten minutes ago and you kicked me out because your caveman great-great-great-ancestor lived in a cave that used to be under my garage, versus "I was there first" as in, hey, I'm descended from Aztecs so I have the right to break into the Mexican's president house and kick his ass out on the street and move to his couch.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2010, 02:06:59 am by Sergius »
Logged

Neruz

  • Bay Watcher
  • I see you...
    • View Profile
Re: Let's discuss 'Avatar.'
« Reply #537 on: April 06, 2010, 02:08:42 am »

I completely agree that Israel's fucking things over, just to make it clear. I just think that any "I was here first" argument is complete bullshit, and it's not the reason WHY Israel is wrong. I happen to think that a lot of Palestinian methods are wrong, too, but given their opponent I can't come up with a better solution, all I can do is condemn the murders they do commit. Honestly, both sides need to try and make this a moral war, not a tactical war. The side that stops killing people to achieve their goals is the side likeliest to win in the end, but the trouble is nobody's willing to do that because everybody feels (somewhat justly) wronged.

Again, you miss the point that "I was there first" isn't automatically invalid. If by "I" I mean, myself, as in, I was living there in my house and was kicked out to make room for somebody else, and right now I'm living somewhere else because I was kicked out from the house that I was probably going to leave to my children when I die, and dude, that TV you're watching, I bought it, and you're eating my food, I was right there like ten minutes ago and you kicked me out because your caveman great-great-great-ancestor lived in a cave that used to be under my garage, versus "I was there first" as in, hey, I'm descended from Aztecs so I have the right to break into the Mexican's president house and kick his ass out on the street and move to his couch.

Ultimately, your claim of owning the house is only superior to the Aztec descendant's claim because your ancestors beat up his ancestors.

It's a fairly recent and modern change that removes force as an accpetable way to gain ownership of something, and it's still seen as acceptable in many parts of the world, like Palestine, and Israel.

Bauglir

  • Bay Watcher
  • Let us make Good
    • View Profile
Re: Let's discuss 'Avatar.'
« Reply #538 on: April 06, 2010, 08:47:42 am »

I completely agree that Israel's fucking things over, just to make it clear. I just think that any "I was here first" argument is complete bullshit, and it's not the reason WHY Israel is wrong. I happen to think that a lot of Palestinian methods are wrong, too, but given their opponent I can't come up with a better solution, all I can do is condemn the murders they do commit. Honestly, both sides need to try and make this a moral war, not a tactical war. The side that stops killing people to achieve their goals is the side likeliest to win in the end, but the trouble is nobody's willing to do that because everybody feels (somewhat justly) wronged.

Again, you miss the point that "I was there first" isn't automatically invalid. If by "I" I mean, myself, as in, I was living there in my house and was kicked out to make room for somebody else, and right now I'm living somewhere else because I was kicked out from the house that I was probably going to leave to my children when I die, and dude, that TV you're watching, I bought it, and you're eating my food, I was right there like ten minutes ago and you kicked me out because your caveman great-great-great-ancestor lived in a cave that used to be under my garage, versus "I was there first" as in, hey, I'm descended from Aztecs so I have the right to break into the Mexican's president house and kick his ass out on the street and move to his couch.


Yeah, except that's not the case any more because a lot of Israelis were born in Israel and have lived there their whole lives. BOTH sides have that claim now, is my point. It's not a case of one guy moving in and shoving the old tenant out anymore. It's a case of "My parents threw your parents out of this house before I was ever born, because their great-great-grandparents lived here before your great-great-grandparents kicked THEM out, and now you're saying we should get out of the house we grew up in just because you have some "ancestral claim"? Sure, maybe it's your TV, but that's my stove, and I'm the one who remodeled the basement."
Logged
In the days when Sussman was a novice, Minsky once came to him as he sat hacking at the PDP-6.
“What are you doing?”, asked Minsky. “I am training a randomly wired neural net to play Tic-Tac-Toe” Sussman replied. “Why is the net wired randomly?”, asked Minsky. “I do not want it to have any preconceptions of how to play”, Sussman said.
Minsky then shut his eyes. “Why do you close your eyes?”, Sussman asked his teacher.
“So that the room will be empty.”
At that moment, Sussman was enlightened.

Jude

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Let's discuss 'Avatar.'
« Reply #539 on: April 06, 2010, 10:33:47 am »

I completely agree that Israel's fucking things over, just to make it clear. I just think that any "I was here first" argument is complete bullshit, and it's not the reason WHY Israel is wrong. I happen to think that a lot of Palestinian methods are wrong, too, but given their opponent I can't come up with a better solution, all I can do is condemn the murders they do commit. Honestly, both sides need to try and make this a moral war, not a tactical war. The side that stops killing people to achieve their goals is the side likeliest to win in the end, but the trouble is nobody's willing to do that because everybody feels (somewhat justly) wronged.
I don't think either side can or should make it a "moral war." The only possible hope for peace is if Israel withdraws the settlers and the occupation, and meanwhile if everyday people make efforts to raise their kids to have respect for each other. One of the NGOs I might work with runs summer camps for that exact purpose. The idea being that if you have kids grow up seeing the other side as actual people (which you'd be amazed how little that happens) then they'll grow up into adults who will treat the situation like adults, as opposed to what's being done now.

Quote
Actually, back on topic, this is what I meant with Quaritch. He's got a legitimate problem with the Na'vi, which is that they killed his friends and are a constant threat to his life and career. The trouble is, the Na'vi have a legitimate problem with the humans, which is that they're basically invading and conquering their homeland without any concern for the locals. The main problem with the analogy is that Quaritch chose to go to Pandora, which means he put himself in that situation, and that's really the only thing in my mind that really makes him out-and-out evil instead of a shades-of-grey-asshole. He's too prideful to realize that his problems were a clear and necessary outcome of his own choices about his life.

Yeah, again, an interesting character analysis - which I somehow doubt was actually present in the movie, given how shallow its characterization was :\ Still, the fact that he chose to go to Pandora would make me pretty unsympathetic to his loss of friends in fighting there.

Quote
Jews have been living in Israel for thousands of years, surviving purges, pogroms, ethnic cleansing, and most recently unrelenting war.
So have plenty of other people. Relevance?

Quote
Ethnic cleansing is something that Muslims do to Jews, not the reverse.  There are Muslims, Christians, and other religious minorities living in peace and security in Israel.
Wherever Muslims take over, on the other hand ... well ... here's a list:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_exodus_from_Arab_lands
Well, nice barely concealed racism. Anyway, what Israel is doing to the occupied territories is ethnic cleansing. Ethnic cleansing doesn't have to be genocide - it's an effort to "cleanse" an area of an ethnic group. Anybody who's been inside the West Bank and seen how the occupation is structured doesn't have any doubts of this - one of its primary goals is to make life so miserable for the people living there that as many of them as possible leave.

Also, you realize the reason why Israel is OK with minorities living inside the technical borders of the state? BECAUSE THEY'RE MINORITIES. Why do you think Israel never formally annexed the West Bank?

Quote
And the ENTIRE WORLD! would condemn ... the EVUL JOOS!  The Palestinians were only using chemical weapons because they were so desperate and oppressed they had no choice!  The band, in other words, would play on.
Yeah, because all the antipathy to Israel is due to nothing but good old antisemitism. Your understanding of the situation is incredibly myopic. Reminds me of a starry-eyed kid fresh off the plane from a "birthright" tour tbh

Quote
The legitimacy of their claim really comes from their fighting a successful war of independence in the wake of a savage campaign of ethnic cleansing fought against them during the turbulent times between the fall of the Ottoman Empire, WWII, and the fall of the British Empire.
You keep bouncing back and forth; first you were making a point about how Jews had been living there for thousands of years, now the legitimacy of their claim comes from winning a war in modern times? Which is it?

Also, nice to know that winning a war over land makes it yours. I guess America has a legal right to make Iraq and Afghanistan states number 51 and 52?
Quote
Israel has no less of a right to exist than Jordan or Iraq,
I've never understood the concept of a "right to exist." What is it? Who decides it? The concept seems like empty words to me. Does a Palestinian state have a right to exist? Did Afghanistan under the Taliban have a right to exist? What does it even mean?
Quote
and no one has the right to "kick the Jews out" of a place they've been living decades, centuries, or millenia regardless of the nationality controlling the territory.
Do the Israelis have the right to kick the Palestinians out? If so, how do they get that right?

Quote
The State of Israel didn't exist when the "Palestinians" attacked (they were Transjordanians at the time).  They waged a brutal, ruthless campaign of ethnic cleansing against Jews.  The creation of the State of Israel was a direct consequence of the savagery of the population we now call "Palestinians".  But no, they never attacked Israel, they only provoked its creation.
Wow, your understanding of history is incredibly flawed. It's a mix of just having the facts wrong, and with a healthy dose of national myth added.

Let me break this down for you. IT WAS NOT THE PALESTINIANS THAT ATTACKED ISRAEL. IT WAS THE ARMIES OF THE NEIGHBORING ARAB STATES. The Palestinians (i.e., people living in Palestine) were a bunch of farmers. Some of them probably did belong to the Jordanian army. The 700-800,000 refugees who ran away from that war were not soldiers. Also, the attack by Jordan, Syria, etc. happened when the UN resolution outlined a Jewish and Arab state in historic Palestine. Israel wasn't formed in reaction to the attack, it was formed in the wake of that resolution.

I know it serves your propaganda purposes to say that "the Palestinians" attacked Israel and tried to ethnically cleanse the Jews. Unfortunately for you, this is untrue.

Anyway, given that your view of history is basically the far-right party line of national mythology as opposed to anything resembling what actually happened, there's no point in arguing over this. Read a history book written by someone who's not an Israeli (or an Arab) propagandist sometime. Better yet, go talk to some Palestinians sometime. You might be amazed to find that they're actually not all foaming at the mouth anti-semites who, as a collective hive mind, have been raging for the destruction of all the world's Jews for the past thousand years.

Still, it does explain how you've come to hold some of the insane views you do
Logged
Quote from: Raphite1
I once started with a dwarf that was "belarded by great hanging sacks of fat."

Oh Jesus
Pages: 1 ... 34 35 [36] 37 38 ... 43