Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 27 28 [29] 30

Author Topic: Infinite Garfield Minus Garfield  (Read 66849 times)

monk12

  • Bay Watcher
  • Sorry, I AM a coyote
    • View Profile
Re: Infinite Garfield Minus Garfield
« Reply #420 on: August 11, 2014, 08:32:40 pm »

Super lame. You could probably win a fair use defense, but then you'd have to, y'know, defend in a court of law. Which would probably not be worth it, unless you can get the ACLU or EFF or somebody involved.

PTTG??

  • Bay Watcher
  • Kringrus! Babak crulurg tingra!
    • View Profile
    • http://www.nowherepublishing.com
Re: Infinite Garfield Minus Garfield
« Reply #421 on: August 12, 2014, 09:55:55 pm »

I just think it's hilarious that Garfield lawyers of all people are accusing others of leeching off of creative works... How many decades have they lived off the fat of suing other people in the name of Holy Jim Davis?

Anyway, this isn't even derived from Garfield, it's derived from Garfield Minus Garfield, which is definitely parody.
Logged
A thousand million pool balls made from precious metals, covered in beef stock.

Neonivek

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Infinite Garfield Minus Garfield
« Reply #422 on: August 13, 2014, 05:47:51 am »

Ehhhh I am less on their side in this case... since all they did is took Garfield comic strips and organized them and SOMETIMES removed characters from them.

They really didn't create anything themselves... didn't change words around, didn't alter scenes, didn't even do commentary... (or wait... they did create a title generator...)

Even if it was Parody, it is pretty much riding directly on their backs way past I think the parody law should protect.

The Lawyers are still being jerks, but ehhh... in court I see it their way.
Logged

PTTG??

  • Bay Watcher
  • Kringrus! Babak crulurg tingra!
    • View Profile
    • http://www.nowherepublishing.com
Re: Infinite Garfield Minus Garfield
« Reply #423 on: August 13, 2014, 11:25:50 am »

Oh well.

...

And, in an attempt to provide some kind of dignified end to the series, I propose the following:
Spoiler: Jon finds his identity (click to show/hide)
« Last Edit: August 14, 2014, 07:39:22 pm by PTTG?? »
Logged
A thousand million pool balls made from precious metals, covered in beef stock.

Trif

  • Bay Watcher
  • the Not-Quite-So-Great-as-Toady One
    • View Profile
Re: Infinite Garfield Minus Garfield
« Reply #424 on: August 14, 2014, 08:44:40 am »

Aw, this was my favorite Garfield fan thing. Sad to see it go, here are some last comics that sort of fit the theme.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Logged
Quote from: Toady One
I wonder if the game has become odd.

zwei

  • Bay Watcher
  • [ECHO][MENDING]
    • View Profile
    • Fate of Heroes
Re: Infinite Garfield Minus Garfield
« Reply #425 on: August 14, 2014, 09:10:22 am »

Super lame. You could probably win a fair use defense, but then you'd have to, y'know, defend in a court of law. Which would probably not be worth it, unless you can get the ACLU or EFF or somebody involved.

Well, it is not hosted in USA so DMCA is fairly toothless (except for app which is hosted by google which has to react to those things) - unless they get some local agency to do the fighting for them.

Right now, waiting for Google to react to DMCA appeal. After that, we shall see.

Even if it was Parody, it is pretty much riding directly on their backs way past I think the parody law should protect.

The Lawyers are still being jerks, but ehhh... in court I see it their way.

Meh, G-G rode that just fine all the way to being published as a book.

monk12

  • Bay Watcher
  • Sorry, I AM a coyote
    • View Profile
Re: Infinite Garfield Minus Garfield
« Reply #426 on: August 14, 2014, 01:15:08 pm »

Ehhhh I am less on their side in this case... since all they did is took Garfield comic strips and organized them and SOMETIMES removed characters from them.

They really didn't create anything themselves... didn't change words around, didn't alter scenes, didn't even do commentary... (or wait... they did create a title generator...)

Even if it was Parody, it is pretty much riding directly on their backs way past I think the parody law should protect.

The Lawyers are still being jerks, but ehhh... in court I see it their way.

That's the thing, they didn't take Garfield comic strips, they took Garfield comic panels and reorganized them to completely change the nature of the strip. It's not a reprinting of old Garfield strips, it's a modification and reinterpretation of them. The central conceit would work well with many other comics, I think, and that's what Infinite Garfield Minus Garfield has created; the conceit.

PTTG??

  • Bay Watcher
  • Kringrus! Babak crulurg tingra!
    • View Profile
    • http://www.nowherepublishing.com
Re: Infinite Garfield Minus Garfield
« Reply #427 on: August 16, 2014, 11:20:08 pm »

Logged
A thousand million pool balls made from precious metals, covered in beef stock.

PTTG??

  • Bay Watcher
  • Kringrus! Babak crulurg tingra!
    • View Profile
    • http://www.nowherepublishing.com
Re: Infinite Garfield Minus Garfield
« Reply #428 on: March 15, 2015, 09:31:18 pm »

Logged
A thousand million pool balls made from precious metals, covered in beef stock.

monk12

  • Bay Watcher
  • Sorry, I AM a coyote
    • View Profile
Re: Infinite Garfield Minus Garfield
« Reply #429 on: March 15, 2015, 09:37:22 pm »

Wait, this is still at thing? Did Google hero it up?

Urist McScoopbeard

  • Bay Watcher
  • Damnit Scoopz!
    • View Profile
Re: Infinite Garfield Minus Garfield
« Reply #430 on: March 15, 2015, 09:46:17 pm »

This thread is like dark souls. Hard to understand, hard to do well in, and it NEVER. FUCKING. DIES.

(I.E. this thread is pretty great.)
Logged
This conversation is getting disturbing fast, disturbingly erotic.

zwei

  • Bay Watcher
  • [ECHO][MENDING]
    • View Profile
    • Fate of Heroes
Re: Infinite Garfield Minus Garfield
« Reply #431 on: March 16, 2015, 01:54:31 pm »

Wait, this is still at thing? Did Google hero it up?

Nah, app is still down.

Website is up because Adams & co likely decided to not care much beyond trying to scare me off.

MrRoboto75

  • Bay Watcher
  • Belongs in the Trash!
    • View Profile
Re: Infinite Garfield Minus Garfield
« Reply #432 on: March 17, 2015, 07:39:57 pm »

Spoiler: Sudden Realization (click to show/hide)
« Last Edit: March 17, 2015, 07:41:49 pm by MrRoboto75 »
Logged
I consume
I purchase
I consume again

Kumil

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Infinite Garfield Minus Garfield
« Reply #433 on: March 28, 2015, 04:24:46 pm »

Logged

Baffler

  • Bay Watcher
  • Caveat Lector.
    • View Profile
Re: Infinite Garfield Minus Garfield
« Reply #434 on: April 02, 2015, 10:28:40 am »

Spoiler: "Evening Plans" (click to show/hide)

Spoiler: "Appropriate Attire" (click to show/hide)

I can't tell you how many times I got three straight panels with nothing in them.
Logged
Quote from: Helgoland
Even if you found a suitable opening, I doubt it would prove all too satisfying. And it might leave some nasty wounds, depending on the moral high ground's geology.
Location subject to periodic change.
Baffler likes silver, walnut trees, the color green, tanzanite, and dogs for their loyalty. When possible he prefers to consume beef, iced tea, and cornbread. He absolutely detests ticks.
Pages: 1 ... 27 28 [29] 30