Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Tylui]

I will reiterate once again that anyone can vote! I need a few tie breakers pl0x.

Although, by asking this, I'm probably just inviting the ULTIMATEGODOFBLARG rule to pass. But oh well! Should be interesting at least.



Aaaaand I just realized, ExKirby, that you were making the rule that Omega would get the powers. Not you. NOW I understand what's happening here.

[Wimdit]

Hm. Want next proposition phase. Rigid adherence to the Rules is important here, and I need some Rules to reflect that.

301: Yes.
302: No.
303: No.

[Tylui]

Turn 1
Phase III - "Execution"


The Propositions!

301: I propose that anyone who posts a proposition that doesn't pass gets to propose two ammendments on the next turn.
Yes: 3 | No: 0
Unanimous Pass!

302: I propose that Omegastick becomes the ULTIMATEGODOFBLARG, and therefor, his votes count for 999999 on every proposition but his own.
Yes: 1 | No: 2
Fail!


303: I propose that the winner of this game of "Metaslature v2.0" be given $1 by each player of this game.
Yes: 1 | No: 2
Fail!


Personally, I'm pleased with the results. After I submitted my proposal I realized how daft it was. Oh well; that's what I get for making a proposal before lunch!

Also, welcome to the game Wimdit!

Phase Status Changes
Omegastick, Proposition Passed(R203), +10 Points
ExKirby, Proposition Failed(R204), -5 Points
Tylui, Proposition Failed(R204), -5 Points

[Tylui]

Turn 2
Phase I - "Proposition"

Phase Status Changes
Tylui, Sympathy Points(R205), +5 Points
ExKirby, Sympathy Points(R205), +5 Points
Wimdit, Sympathy Points(R205), +5 Points
Tylui, First Participation(R202), +5 Points

[Tylui]

My Proposition is as follows:

"Any Proposition with subsets are to be treated as a single Proposition."

This way we can add entire blocks of rules, much like the Rules for "Rule Types". (In the past games of Metaslature this has been a problem so I'll get it out of the way early.)

[ExKirby]

Seeing as I failed, I get two propositions, right?

First, I will make a rule that reads as following:

A player can be nominated to be an EARTHBOUND IMMORTAL. EARTHBOUND IMMORTALs have no effect on the game.

And if I DO get a second rule....

Omegastick shalt become an EARTHBOUND IMMORTAL.

[Wimdit]

Hmmm. I would like to propose amendment 306, regarding the immutable Rule 104.A.I.b: 'A Player may suggest one Proposition per Turn.'

In light of the scarcity of participants in this game, and the undeniable need for twisted and impossible-to-follow additions to the Rules, I propose that Rule 104.A.I.b be changed as follows:

104.A.I.b - A Player may suggest up to four Propositions per turn.

[Tylui]

Seeing as I failed, I get two propositions, right?

First, I will make a rule that reads as following:

A player can be nominated to be an EARTHBOUND IMMORTAL. EARTHBOUND IMMORTALs have no effect on the game.

And if I DO get a second rule....

Omegastick shalt become an EARTHBOUND IMMORTAL.

Actually there are two things wrong with the two proposals rule, one of which I woke up in the middle of the night and went "AWW DAMNIT".

First off, since Rule 104.A.I.b stats that 'A Player may suggest one Proposition per Turn', that means it'll never be okay to suggest more than one proposition until that rule is changed(looks like Wimdit is ON IT).

Secondly, the new rule (301) states "Any Player that posts a proposition that doesn't pass gets to propose two amendments on the next turn" which means that it wouldn't work until THIS round anyway. If it had said "Any Player that had a Proposition in the last Turn not pass may Propose two Propositions in the current Turn", then it would be kosher for this round, but it will only apply to the next turn. Which means that it didn't start tracking unpassed proposals until now.

Also, in order for your proposition to make more sense to me, maybe we should word it thusly: "A Player can be nominated to be an EARTHBOUND IMMORTAL. EARTHBOUND IMMORTALs cannot participate in any Phase of this game. Once nominated, a player becomes an EARTHBOUND IMMORTAL by a majority vote by all current Players."

And then the only problem I could see with that wording is what happens when "current players" quit responding?

While this rule makes me nervous, it might be a good idea to be able to blacklist certain... destructive... players.

@Wimdit: Since that amends an immutable rule, it'll take a unanimous vote...

[ExKirby]

Meh, let's go with that reword.

Wait... scrap the second sentence. I want EARTHBOUND IMMORTALS to still play, but for the time being, they are just fancy player titles.

[Tylui]

Turn 2
Phase II - "Discussion"


The Propositions!

Tylui
304: "Any Proposition with subsets are to be treated as a single Proposition."

ExKirby
305: "A Player can be nominated to be an EARTHBOUND IMMORTAL. Once nominated, a player becomes an EARTHBOUND IMMORTAL by a majority vote by all current Players."

Wimdit
306: "Rule 104.A.I.b will be changed to read: '104.A.I.b - A Player may suggest up to four Propositions per turn.'"

Phase Status Changes]
ein, Becomes Player(R103.A)
ein, First Participation(R202), +5 Points

[ein]

304: Yes.
305: Yes (assuming it will be a fancy title and nothing more [for the time being, at least]).
306: Yes.

[Tylui]

304. Yes!
305. Yes!
306. Yes... ein convinced me.

[ein]

I voted yes on 306 because it'll make the game faster, sooner.
If things get too fast (as in, lots more people join), we can vote it back to one.

[Tylui]

True! Okey, sounds good to me.

Also, welcome to the game, ein.

[ein]

I have an uncanny attraction to metametagaming.