TonyMen:
Wow, that is the most blatant OMGUS I've ever seen. Your only argument seems to be 'You argued with someone who flipped town and you VOTED him!!! SCUM!!!!!'. Why would that be?
The only reason this would be an OMGUS is because Jim voted first. I would have voted him if I was on sooner. If I seem to recall correctly you OMGUS'd someone yesterday so put a sock in it.
Wow, you don't stop at OMGUSing someone out of the blue, you
admit to doing it and your only explanation is 'you did it too' (even though I explained my actions and you didn't)? Hang, scum.
And as to your question... Why do you care? Mislynches happen constantly. breadbocks was dripping scumminess so he went to noose for that. We're going to take that into account and move on with scumhunt. Now stop buddying (the dead) and do the same.
I care because I need as much information as I can get to find the mafia. What's interesting is you just call it off as just a 'mislynch' like LNCP too...we could do better than that. Indifferent town really suck, you know? Especially the other ones that don't bother playing or talk about restaurants.
Oh sure, we should be instead fussing over who could do such a terrible deed.
Pray tell us, Toony, what have YOU found out yesterday? Most of your posts consisted of at most two-line useless remarks, the rest was spent on pounding Pandar and defending breadsnail. And what the fuck was the following?!
I found out that you, Jim, and LNCP are probably the scum team we're looking at. Have any way to be useful? How about a scum suspicion list? That would be good.
Wow, that's sudden. Any explanations about your perfect deductions? How about answering my last question? And no scumlist for you until all this replacement shit gets sorted out and everyone posts his thoughts.
Think:
I warned about incoming OMGUS because there's a crapload of people (yes, I'm looking in your direction, LNCP) that will cry foul despite whatever arguments will accompany the vote if it was directed at someone who already had a vote on the voter. The same reason goes for answering questions directed to another. Call it paranoia.
Firstly, your reasoning should be sufficient to stand on its own, if it's a good vote. Secondly, this only answers half my question. What questions of EvilTwin did you answer? I'm looking at the post, and I don't see questions, I only see responses. I'm wondering not just why you preemptively defended yourself, I'm wondering why you defended yourself against a accusation that seems hollow to me. Care to explain why you felt that you were answering questions meant for another?
To be honest, I don't remember why I wrote 'answering questions directed at another'. What I meant was that I was interested in his answers and the suspicious questions he gave Toaster. Why are you so questioning of that exact phrase? Are you desperately seeking a foothold against me?
Now, as I look over your D2 activity, you seem to be doing exactly three things: answering questions directed at you, attacking me over a single phrase in a single post and asking TonyMen the same exact questions asked by other people. What do you think about Jim?
Toaster:
Dariush had flip-flop OMGUSes early game, with him unable to come up with a straight answer for voting me before giving up and going after Breadbocks with a bandwagon OMGUS combo. His D2 post is better than his D1 ones, but he's hardly putting forth great effort or originality into hunting.
Heh, originality, heh. Trying to deduce scum based on amount of vowels in their posts or by the current weather? And I'm explaining for the... what, fourth time? My vote for you about probabilities was a randomvote, I wanted to see how you would hold out. You held pretty well, so I moved on with my hunting. Now, you yourself look pretty damn quite and inactive, nothing like your usual hyperagressive self. Maybe you should start scumhunting? What is your opinion on Jim?
Jim:
Why are you ignoring and indirectly buddying me?
Author
Topic: Paranormal Mafia 19 - Day 2 -Rebooting (Read 69903 times)